Slashdot Mirror


Hybrid Hard Drives Just Need 8GB of NAND

judgecorp writes "Research from Seagate suggests that hybrid hard drives in general use are virtually as good as solid state drives if they have just 8GB of solid state memory. The research found that normal office computers, not running data-centric applications, access just 9.58GB of unique data per day. 8GB is enough to store most of that, and results in a drive which is far cheaper than an all-Flash device. Seagate is confident enough to ease off on efforts to get data off hard drives quickly, and rely on cacheing instead. It will cease production of 7200 RPM laptop drives at the end of 2013, and just make models running at 5400 RPM."

3 of 373 comments (clear)

  1. Of course! And you never need more than 640K RAM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No chance this is just the company saying this because they missed the boat on solid state drives?

  2. Re:Hybrid drives on Linux? by fnj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    SSHDs as implemented by Seagate do not require any support whatsoever in the host. Their caching algorithm does not care anything about the FS. It is block level. I have one working just fine in arch linux. Linux just sees it as any other HD, only it is much faster overall. Obviously you will never see any improvement at all in huge file copies.

    WD has some lame Windows-only SSHD tech that does require special software on the host.

  3. Re:But their 5400RPM hybrid drives suck by vux984 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I took into account cost, capacity and performance when choosing the drives.

    But not battery life, apparently, which is the one area where 5400 rpm drives beat out 7200 rpm drives, and is possibly the reason they even exist. A 5400rpm hybrid would need to spin up even less and should do even better on the battery front. Not to mention that if you get a cache hit, it doesn't have to spin up at all, which is a big performance boost too.

    So while "benchmark" performance might not be great, real world use might be substantial; as the hard drive could spin down more, and you could access the drive without spinning it up some of the time, possibly even most of the time.

    There's definitely potential to be both markedly faster in real world laptop use scenarios and consume less battery with a hybrid. Whether that pans out in reality I don't know.