Slashdot Mirror


US To Standardize Car App/communication Device Components

coondoggie writes "The U.S. Department of Transportation has high hopes of standardizing the way autos talk to each other and with other intelligent roadway systems of the future. The department recently issued a call for public and private researchers and experts to help it build what the DOT called 'a hypothetical four layer approach to connected vehicle devices and applications certification.'"

5 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. Not needed for drivers though. by game+kid · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is probably not needed for their drivers though. The use of middle fingers and "FUCK YOU!" appears to have caught on just fine as an industry standard.

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  2. This is probably a good idea in the long run by intermodal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the short run, the real question for me will not be how the cars communicate with each other, but how they handle the cars that do not communicate at all. Nobody wants to swap engine oil at 75MPH with the VW Bus going 55 just because the bus wasn't communicating. Just like how nobody wants to meet the driver of that car that had to stop short to avoid a hazard.

    I think for me, the biggest feature I'd like to see is a HUD that gives me a relative speed on the cars around me along with warning indicators communicated from cars ahead when debris is noted on the road. Hate that last-minute slight swerve to dodge a thrown tyre-tread that I couldn't see until the swerve.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    1. Re:This is probably a good idea in the long run by intermodal · · Score: 5, Funny

      the problem with the prior art is that the display of that HUD is really buggy.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  3. Re:Please give me "get off the left-lane stupid" m by Anubis+IV · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You do realize that he's complaining about people engaging in illegal practices, right? Where I live, cops regularly enforce the "Left lane for passing only" signs that were posted within the last year on our main freeway. If you're in the left lane and not passing the guy next to you, you'll earn yourself a citation pretty quickly because what you're doing is not only illegal, it also endangers everyone else on the road by causing cars to pile up behind you, thus increasing the likelihood of an accident significantly.

    Your chief calling while driving is not to abide by the law, but to drive safely. Following the law is the best way to drive safely in about 99% of situations, but the laws are inadequate at times, and it is not your responsibility to try and enforce them against others, since your doing so will more often than not result in a more dangerous situation than if you had left the other driver alone. Every cop I know will tell you that it's okay to speed up beyond the limit in order to pass someone if doing so will result in a safer driving situation for the people involved. And at least where I live, failing to do so means that you need to drop back and get out of the left lane if you want to be law-abiding. Either way, it's safer for everyone involved.

  4. Re:What about makeing the EZ-pass system work for by mattack2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually US *is* an acronym.

    No, it's not. You don't pronounce U.S. as "us". An acronym is when you pronounce it as a word.

    acronym
    noun
    an abbreviation formed from the initial letters of other words and pronounced as a word (e.g., ASCII, NASA).

    U.S. is an initialism.

    initialism
    noun
    an abbreviation consisting of initial letters pronounced separately (e.g., CPU).