Slashdot Mirror


Bone-Eating Worms Found In Antarctic Waters

sciencehabit writes "When you drop a whale backbone into Antarctic waters and retrieve it a year later, you'll find it covered with a pelt of wriggling, rosy-hued worms. Drop a chunk of wood in the same spot, and you'll discover that it's hardly changed. That's the result of a simple experiment to find out if some of the world's weirdest worms also live in Antarctic waters. The discovery extends the range of bone-eating worms to the Southern Ocean and suggests that Antarctic shipwrecks may be remarkably intact."

14 of 38 comments (clear)

  1. Aha! by Cryacin · · Score: 5, Funny

    When you drop a whale backbone into Antarctic waters and retrieve it a year later, you'll find it covered with a pelt of wriggling, rosy-hued worms

    So *this* is the "scientific research" that the Japanese are performing.

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    1. Re:Aha! by Fluffeh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, they do "research" that is much less scientific.

      "I wonder if THIS whale tastes any different to the others we have caught today...."

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    2. Re:Aha! by cheater512 · · Score: 3, Funny

      And is it better with soy sauce or sweet chilli?

    3. Re:Aha! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny

      When you drop a whale backbone into Antarctic waters and retrieve it a year later, you'll find it covered with a pelt of wriggling, rosy-hued worms

      So *this* is the "scientific research" that the Japanese are performing.

      After Fukushima, one of those little wormies might be the next Gojira.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:Aha! by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      plenty of slashdotters use the sriracha like most americans use ketchup

  2. Unspoken by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    The discovery extends the range of bone-eating worms to the Southern Ocean and suggests that Antarctic shipwrecks may be remarkably intact.

    The boats, maybe; but apparently not the crew...

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  3. Re:Wouldn't it of been easier ... by Mashiki · · Score: 2

    There's a much simpler answer. It's not even seasonal, the lack of wood in general doesn't foster that type of ecosystem. Once you're above the treeline you're not going to find much if any wood, except that which has either made the trip via humans, or by natural disasters.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  4. Re:Wouldn't it of been easier ... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe the wood worms just spread out and find new wood to eat on an annual cycle, or are just really slow to find new wood.

    Where would this wood come from? The tropical rainforests of Antarctica?

  5. Depth, temperature and current more important by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At any location a few hundred miles out of the coast, the chances of wood ending up there are way too small for any species to rely on that. In general, almost all wood floats. Wooden ship wrecks sink mainly because ships have ballast and metal bits, or the lighter than water parts are eaten by bacteria. It's the same bacteria that eventually will make all thrift wood sink, unless it's washed ashore somewhere. Wood that is heavier than water by itself tends to not end up far from shores anyway.

    Given the fact that wood is a rare food source under water regardless of where you are, the question is what the wildlife that causes ship wrecks to decay feasts on when they are lacking historical nautical drama to dine on. Apparently the Antarctic seas aren't providing enough of that to be a sustainable habitat for these creatures. There are plenty of algae available in the higher layers of the Antarctic seas, or they wouldn't be able to sustain the krill population that the whales and fish feed on, but it could very well be that that is the only plant life and no larger plants are growing there. I haven't bothered looking that up, but it sounds to me that this is a much more likely explanation than "lack of trees on land" would be.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  6. Re:Not surprising by lxs · · Score: 2

    Typical nerd. Any excuse to stay indoors.

  7. Pristine and intact. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Just picture famed Antarctic explorer Ernest Shackleton’s ship Endurance, which sank in 1915 in western Antarctic waters. Its pine and oak hull now lie on the sea floor, most likely pristine and intact, awaiting discovery."

    That ship was crushed to pieces in the ice, hardly pristine and intact.

  8. These worms.. by StarfishOne · · Score: 4, Funny

    .. are said to be b-b-b-b-bad to the bone. ;-)

  9. Re:Depth, temperature and current more important by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, I think it's safe to assume that most wood enters the ocean via rivers, I would expect the vast majority of it is consumed by hungry critters before it gets of the river's underwater delta. From personal experience I worked on a fishing trawler in the Southern Ocean many years ago, even back in the 80's the ship pretty much drove itself but there had to be someone on watch at all times to avoid hazards (identified on the radar). Floating trees were the main worry but I only saw one or two when out at sea, which seems to agree with what your saying. The vast majority of the hazards turned out to be either floating beer cans, or sun-baking seals. Yes, they were Aussie seals, but I still haven't figured out how they managed the ring-pull with those flippers. :)

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  10. Re:Wouldn't it of been easier ... by Nyder · · Score: 2

    Maybe the wood worms just spread out and find new wood to eat on an annual cycle, or are just really slow to find new wood.

    Where would this wood come from? The tropical rainforests of Antarctica?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savage_Land

    --
    Be seeing you...