Slashdot Mirror


Partner of Guardian's Snowden Reporter Detained Under Terrorism Act

hydrofix writes "The partner of the Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald, who has written a series of stories revealing mass surveillance programs by the National Security Agency (NSA), was held for almost nine hours on Sunday by UK authorities as he passed through the Heathrow airport on his way home to Rio de Janeiro. David Miranda was stopped by officers and informed that he would be questioned under the Terrorism Act 2000. The 28-year-old was held for nine hours, the maximum the law allows before officers must release or formally arrest the individual. According to official figures, most examinations last under an hour, and only one in 2,000 people detained are kept for more than six hours. Miranda was released without charge, but officials confiscated electronics including his mobile phone, laptop, camera, memory sticks, DVDs and games consoles. 'This is a profound attack on press freedoms [...] to detain my partner for a full nine hours while denying him a lawyer, and then seize large amounts of his possessions, is clearly intended to send a message of intimidation to those of us who have been reporting on the NSA and GCHQ,' Greenwald commented."

9 of 426 comments (clear)

  1. Update the constitution by fey000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Land of the Free(*).

    *Conditions may apply.

    1. Re:Update the constitution by AxeTheMax · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It can be revised all you like but it won't do any good if you have a corrupt police (secret service?) who know their job is to protect their masters in Westminster and Washington.

    2. Re:Update the constitution by currently_awake · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is a legal limit on detaining suspects without charging them, there should be a legal limit on taking their stuff without charging them. Without a time limit, it's just theft.

    3. Re:Update the constitution by sumdumass · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What does the USA have to do with this. This happened in the UK by UK agents using a UK law that was written pre 9/11.

  2. Re:"Partner" by sribe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's Glenn's own word [theguardian.com]! I'm in a civil union with my "partner" and I don't particularly mind this term. Although I agree it can be confusing, most of the time people get what you mean by context. When I marry him this November, i'll call him my "husband" but not before then. You can blame the homophobes for creating this dual tier of unions but it does exist and I might as well use the proper confusing term as much as possible to emphasize just how idiotic it was that until just recently I couldn't get married.

    And in a written article, without any context to convey whether this is a personal or business relationship, the term "life partner" would be much better.

  3. Re:Not a journalist, so not protected... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Being the 'partner' of a journalist does not entitle you to the normal freedoms of actually being a member of the press

    No, but he's still entitled to the normal freedoms of being a fucking human being.

  4. As an American ... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Papers, please.

    Brought to you by the same people who entertained you with "Destroyed the Village to Save It" and "Fighting for Peace"

    ... it hurts me every time people point out the truth of my country, and, it hurts me MORE when I realize that there is NOTHING I could do to change the situation

    Indeed, my country is turning, from the best country in the world, into a terrifying state

    My heart hurts, man, when I realize that, I, as an American, can't do shit to change the course of my own country

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  5. ... but if everything does this ... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nonsense. Vote small (independent) and buy small (independent). Your actions won't count for much but if everyone does this ....money won't control politics regardless of the opinion of SCOTUS.

    ..."but if everyone does this" ?

    Sir, I do not know which world you live in, but the world which I am from, the scenario that you have outlined WILL NOT HAPPEN, not when the vast majority of my fellow Americans prefer keep their sheeple status

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re: ... but if everything does this ... by s.petry · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Stop whining and take action. Of course nothing changes while you claim defeat and do nothing. Grow a pair already! Yes it is going to take hard work to force change. You will have to talk to people, petition, and vote.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.