Slashdot Mirror


Germany Produces Record-Breaking 5.1 Terawatt Hours of Solar Energy In One Month

oritonic1 writes "Germany is rapidly developing a tradition of shattering its own renewable energy goals and leaving the rest of the world in the dust. This past July was no exception, as the nation produced 5.1 TWh of solar power (PDF), beating not only its own solar production record, but also eclipsing the record 5TWh of wind power produced by German turbines in January. Renewables are doing so well, in fact, that one of Germany's biggest utilities is threatening to migrate to Turkey."

4 of 687 comments (clear)

  1. Re: NO NO NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nuclear subsidies are in your taxes, where you don't see them. Solar subsidies are in the electricity price, where you see them. Nuclear energy is not cheap energy, and while it does work for base load, you only need to look at France in the winter and in the summer to see that relying on nuclear does not cover all loads, so you also need other power plants on standby, so nuclear does not have an advantage over wind and solar there.

  2. Re:At what cost? by reve_etrange · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Subsidies and negative externalities of the fossil fuel and other non-renewable energies and future return to scale of the solar energies are distortions to the economic picture and must be excluded for an honest discussion on the topic.

    FTFY

    --
    .: Semper Absurda :.
  3. Re:NO NO NO by Tim+the+Gecko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It can, only problem is last time I checked (a few years ago though) it took about 6 TW of energy to produce solar cells that could deliver that much energy.

    Don't you mean TWh? TW is the rate of energy production.

    The good news is that the cells last for longer than a month. From your guesstimate figures it seems like they break even remarkably quickly, and then are energy positive for decades.

  4. Re:NO NO NO by KugelKurt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yet another example how socialism fails.

    You have a weird definition of socialism.