Slashdot Mirror


Three Banks Lose Millions After Wire Transfer Switches Hacked

mask.of.sanity writes "Criminals have stolen millions from three unnamed U.S. banks by launching slow and stealthy denial of service attacks as a distraction before attacking wire payment switches. The switches manage and execute wire transfers and could have coughed up much more cash should the attackers have pressed on. RSA researcher Limor Kessem said, 'The service portal is down, the bank is losing money and reliability, and the security team is juggling the priorities of what to fix first. That's when the switch attack – which is very rare because those systems are not easily compromised [and require] high-privilege level in a more advanced persistent threat style case – takes place.'"

2 of 179 comments (clear)

  1. stealthy? by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Informative

    slow and stealthy denial of service attacks

    I don't think a DOS can be stealthy......if it's denying service, are people going to notice?

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  2. Re:You know I really love by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the article....
    "The researchers said fraudsters were using Dirt Jumper, a $200 crimeware kit that launches DDoS attacks, to draw bank employees' attention away from fraudulent wire and ACH transactions ranging from $180,000 to $2.1 million in attempted transfers."

    Sounds like theft to me. Now granted it says "attempted transfers," but, I think someone made themselves very rich while only giving the banking system a minor scratch. A few million is pocket change in the land of banking.

    --
    Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable