Slashdot Mirror


Diablo 3 Expansion Announced: Reaper of Souls

Today at Gamescom in Germany, Blizzard announced the first expansion to Diablo III, titled Reaper of Souls. The story will follow a fallen archangel called Mathael who has returned as the Angel of Death. The level cap will increase to 70, and the expansion will bring a new playable class to the game called the Crusader, whom they described as a "natural walking tank." Reaper of Souls will also bring vast improvements to the loot system; in addition to having a better chance to find good, useful gear for the character you're playing, the items themselves are getting an overhaul to make for more interesting gameplay. Instead of being simply loaded down with combat stats, legendary items will include unique ways to modify how your character functions. They're also implementing something the community has been asking for since shortly after the game came out: randomized dungeons. Further, the Paragon leveling system, put in place after launch as a way to provide character progression after reaching the level cap, will be made account-wide, rather than on a per-character basis. A new profession NPC has been added as well: the Mystic, which lets players reroll one of the stats on a powerful item. As you might expect, Blizzard did not mention a release date. The Reaper of Souls opening cinematic is available on YouTube, as is a brief gameplay video.

26 of 137 comments (clear)

  1. Don't expect high sales by WarJolt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Gamer don't normally allow themselves to be disappointed twice.

    1. Re:Don't expect high sales by dyingtolive · · Score: 5, Informative

      I swore Blizzard off after the first D3, and then was pleasantly surprised when no one I knew liked Heart of the Swarm. I will pass on this one as well.

      Something interesting I noticed a few weeks ago is that the only game I've enjoyed that I paid more than $20 for in as long as I can remember is Payday 2.

      I think I'm officially off the Triple-As.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    2. Re:Don't expect high sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow, you're a sour person aren't you? Is it really something for you to see others fail? Is that what it takes to make you feel good? Wow. Just wow.

      He expected Heart of the Swarm to be a good game and well received by his friends, making him regret his decision not to buy it. He's happy that his friends' opinions seem to confirm that he made the right decision in not buying the game. I don't see anything "sour" in that.

    3. Re:Don't expect high sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wrong. Gamers don't normally hold grudges.

      If the game's good, the message will spread "omg they fixed it" and people will flock (back) to it.

      If it's not, ah well. Some will still play it, just like how some people still play farmville or candy crush saga (and pay for it too)

      Holding grudges (to a dev, to a company, to a publisher, to a platform, etc) is a thing for nerds (so I don't expect this comment to be well received here)

    4. Re:Don't expect high sales by JDeane · · Score: 2

      What I don't understand is how you can go from Diablo II LOD to Diablo III... I bought Diablo 1 maybe a year after it came out (hey computers where expensive back then! lol) when Diablo II came out I had it on pre order at Electronics Boutique and managed to get my copy a day early... So awesome!!! Then the expansion came out LOD and holy shit it was fucking awesome, the patches only made it (mostly) better and I still play on the ladder to this day. I may have spent some money on the game but I feel like I have gotten 10 times my money out of it in value. I got Diablo III the day it released, I have a barb about half way into inferno and even made some money (more money than I spent on buying the game!) at the RMA and holy shit you can't even pay me to play the game.... (I mean that literally I can make money playing it and I still just can't bring myself to do it. The game is boring....)

      Maybe the expansion will fix some things, but after reading up on it and watching the video's a couple of times each trying to see what was new... I don't see any sort of in depth crafting system or runewords. I probably will skip the expansion unless it gets insanely good reviews months after release (you can't trust new reviews on a new game those are prime selling material....)

  2. "Crusader" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... may want to rename that class for the Middle East...

  3. Strayed too far from the original formula by stewsters · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Randomized dungeons are a good sign. The devs need to go play some roguelikes and less WOW for a few weeks before working on it. That may detoxify them enough to fix it.

  4. Deja Vu? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Informative

    I seem to remember playing this class in D2 but it was called a Paladin at the time.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:Deja Vu? by Alok · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I remember randomized dungeons in D1, and good loot systems in both D1 & D2.

      Unfortunately most of the 'new to D3!' stuff is a rehash of things that used to exist in the former games, but at least they are working to bring it up to par in those departments.

  5. Expect high sales by Piata · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gamers are stupid. Blizzard has been on a downturn for a while but people will still line up in droves for this. If you need any further proof, look at Call of Duty. Exact same engine, almost indentical gameplay, loaded to the brim with shitty DLC that's made irrelevant by next year's installment and it STILL sells 10 - 15 million units.

    Look how long it's taken for people to abandon EA. It's been years since they were considered the worst company ever and they are just now starting to feel that wrath. If Blizzard and their brands fall, it will happen at a slow and steady pace.

    1. Re:Expect high sales by lgw · · Score: 2

      Sure, except that only a small percentage of people who bought D3 are still playing it. I'm sure those still playing it will mostly buy the expansion, but those who were disappointed not so much.

      I thought it was an OK game - played it for several nights, and can't complain about the hours of entertainment I got for my money, but it fell well below the "buy the sequel" bar. There is no shortage of new games, and in any case I'd find going back to D2 single player more fun than a D3 expansion. Heck, if I could find that expansion for D1 that added nightmare and hell difficulty, I'd play it - D1 was a neat (if simple) roguelike.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:Expect high sales by Onuma · · Score: 2

      Actually, you could (at one point, at least) effectively increase the difficulty level in Single Player by starting a local/nullmodem multiplayer game, then backing out of it and going into single player instead. It wasn't quirky, and it didn't *TELL* you that you were in a higher difficulty...but as soon as you fought the first monsters you knew it wasn't normal anymore.

      And the "Hellfire" expansion (released by Sierra) also added those difficulties, as well as the ability to walk really fast in town. It was nice to finally be able to get through town without waiting ages :)

      --
      What else can happen when an unstoppable force collides with an immovable object?
  6. Thanks Dice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hope this slashvertisement paid the bills!

  7. Offline Single Player? by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Any word on offline single player? No offline single player, no sale.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Offline Single Player? by CronoCloud · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, they aren't doing that.

      Actually, they did do that, in the console versions.

    2. Re:Offline Single Player? by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly how often are you in front of your gaming PC without internet access? Serious question.

      That's not the point at all. I refuse to buy a game that can be taken away from me at any point with no recourse. I still play 30 year old games on my Tandy, and I hope to be around to play games from today 30 years from now.

      I object to disposible culture in the strongest possible terms. If this practice becomes acceptable, future generations will be unable to benefit from their cultural heritage. What if the works of Shakespeare and Bach were dependent on a third party service that disappeared 10 years after release?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  8. No need for an expansion, Blizzard by Azure+Flash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're already reaped my soul with Diablo 3. I had to Exile myself to repair the damage you've done to my soul.

  9. Fool me once...maybe I'll be back in ten years. by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I won't be buying this expansion because D3 was such a huge disappointment, I don't see any expansion ever making it fun. I think my highest level character was 37 -- I stopped when I got to Hell difficulty, because there seemed no point in playing the exact same content over a third time. Meanwhile it didn't seem possible to progress without spending real-world money. Blizzard lost me with this game.

    But on a related note, I have a question. Sony Online Entertainment (SOE) is bringing out the new Everquest Next which looks amazing. But I swore off of Sony in 2000 after being a guide in the original Everquest. The guide program was so corrupt, and the John Smedley administration was so disrespectful of the players, that I swore never to buy another Sony game. Has Sony improved? After more than ten years I'd be willing to give them another chance if I hear that they're not the pure evil they used to be. (I know EA is still pure evil, but I haven't heard anything lately about SOE.)

    Blizzard has probably lost me for ten years. We'll see if they still try to trick players into spending money, and whether they re-discover what makes game fun.

    --
    Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    1. Re:Fool me once...maybe I'll be back in ten years. by Alok · · Score: 2

      EQ Next is going to be free 2 play, so what is the harm in trying it out? It looks really interesting, I definitely plan to play - never played EQ at all so it will be a completely new world & lore for me. If they start pushing microtransactions heavily etc., its not a big loss to stop once the game is no longer fun.

  10. Wonk wonk wonk... by Urthas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...oh, please. All of you saying that you're done with Blizzard, and "fool me once...", and that you won't buy RoS are not fooling anyone. You will ALL buy it. Maybe not at first, but you will. And you know it.

  11. New Paragon system will make HC a joke by Alok · · Score: 2

    Anyone who gets to level 60 (or I guess its now level 70) can now work at getting Paragon levels, and use the points for Vit on ALL characters? This means that HC has far less risk for those who have a whole lot of extra Vit compared to the plebs who don't have a higher level char.

    Of course, there's already big differences depending on what equipment you can afford or got lucky to find, but I wonder if this could make people lose interest in the HC scene (or conversely, some will buy the expansion just so that their alts start off with a lot of advantages)

  12. D3 Expansion set was already released... by GoJays · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...It's called Torchlight 2.

    The real Diablo 3 in my books.

    1. Re:D3 Expansion set was already released... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      Disagree 100%. I've played Torchlight 2, Path of Exile, and Borderlands 2. IMO the FREE Path of Exile is by far away the true spiritual successor to Diablo 2. The only Pay-To-Win they have is that you can buy, colorize, and rename your stash tabs which is a god-send compared to the crappy 4 tabs D3 offers.

      Diablo 3 is an epic failure for one reason: itemization. Precisely, the total lack of it. One of the things that made D2 so great was the multiple tier economies:
      * chipped gems,
      * pgems
      * set items
      * runes
      * runewords
      * keys
      * torches
      * anni
      * Rares

      No matter where your wealth was, you could always "upgrade" to the next tier of wealth given enough time. Even a shitty Hammerdin with crap gear could MF / farm.

      Diablo 3 threw all the great things right out the window and made a game for boobs & noobs = BORING. In contradistinction the Path of Exile skill tree is HUGE -- there are a large number of variety builds built around single items (just like D2) compared to the few cookie-cutter D3 builds offers.

      Where again is the PvP in D3 ??
      http://www.pcgamesn.com/diablo/diablo-3s-game-director-problem-pvp-its-got-be-blizzard-quality

  13. No sale by ninetyninebottles · · Score: 2

    I'm a casual gamer. I don't mind shelling out some money for a weekend or two of fun. I bought Diablo 3 and at first it was, okay, but not on par with Diablo 2. I often ended up dying or at least being very annoyed when network lag interfered with playability, and of course there is no offline mode. That was annoying. But the real problem came when my account was de-activated randomly one day. Well crap, that's strange, but I had the serial and the login and password for my account, how much of a hassle could it be? Several e-mail exchanges and numerous broken help pages later, they finally decided they needed a copy of my driver's license! WTF?

    I might consider another game from Blizzard in future if they ever manage to implement a level of DRM that doesn't inconvenience me, their customer, quite so much with poorer gameplay and stupid bureaucracy. I tossed Diablo 3 in the trash, sent an e-mail explaining why, and bought a better game (for less money) from their competitor.

    Blizzard has done nothing to address what was wrong with Diablo 3 for this customer.

  14. Re:Great by Urthas · · Score: 2

    Actually, there is supposed to be a major itemization patch before the expansion is released. They did the same thing prior to releasing LoD.

  15. Freemium in disguise by valkenar · · Score: 2

    As long as Blizzard is making money off the auction house I'm not playing D3. I gave them the benefit and bought it once, but there's no way I'm falling for freemium-in-disguise again. I'd much rather pay a monthly fee and have the game actually be balanced correctly. D3 was fun for a while, and had some good innovations, but it also had some glaring flaws and the auction house alone would've overwhelmed any good qualities it had. When there's a profit motive to making the game worse, you can count on a mediocre-at-best product.