Is the Stable Linux Kernel Moving Too Fast?
darthcamaro writes "Yesterday the stable Linux 3.10 kernel was updated twice — an error was made, forcing a quick re-issue. 'What happened was that a patch that was reported to be broken during the RC [release candidate] review process, went into the release, because I mistakenly didn't pull it out in time,' Greg Kroah-Hartman said. The whole incident however is now sparking debate on the Linux Kernel Mailing List about the speed of stable Linux kernel releases. Are they moving too fast?"
I mistakenly didn't pull it out in time.
WHAT THE FUCK!
I can't believe this. I've been reading Slashdot since 1998, and I have never seen such a stupid suggestion in all that time.
...
OK, one of those two must be blatantly false.
Thanks Linus, but I think it's an established rule that you can't go releasing new versions of software until the ridicule surrounding your last release has died down. How else are we going to get stories for /.? Microsoft plays along. Why can't you?
Now you're being redundant.
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
Only said fuck four times not including subject. Not Linus.
---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
Apologizing for mistakenly not pulling out in time...hilarious.