Slashdot Mirror


Will the Headless Ape Robot Win the DARPA Challenge?

New submitter pausz42 writes "The NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory and Stanford University are promoting RoboSimian, a simian-inspired robot able to face environments which are hostile for men. In the DARPA Robotics Challenge the selected teams have to develop an autonomous robot able to get into a car, drive it to a disaster site and perform hazardous activities. While this prototype is the only one that that doesn't have a humanoid shape (and it's quite creepy, since it does not have a head), it seems that its three fingered limbs are better fitted for some of the difficult tasks required by the DARPA challenge."

37 comments

  1. hostile environment? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Funny

    "able to face environments which are hostile for men."

    So, like a room full of feminists?

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    1. Re:hostile environment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Or simply women :)

    2. Re:hostile environment? by jovius · · Score: 4, Funny

      More like a room full of mirrors.

    3. Re:hostile environment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm more worried about the seperation of the military from Congress for there is nothing more hostile to man than the pro-corporate Congress.

    4. Re:hostile environment? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Blacks and ethnic minorities are protected under law. Privileged, university-educated white women aren't.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:hostile environment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't hate others just because you hate yourself, your own life, your own culture, your own nation, your own parents, and everyone who gave you every opportunity they could :)

    6. Re:hostile environment? by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      How about a congress without limits? Where they can pass anything they want? You want less hostility? You want to reduce the chances of the US becoming a police state? Then insist on limited government. We have a framework for that - it's called the constitution.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    7. Re:hostile environment? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Haw haw! Got any nigger or Polack jokes, Max?

      First, it would be black people or Pole jokes. Last I checked "feminist" was not considered a pejorative word (although with modern Political Correctness you can never be completely sure).

      Second, I don't see how such a joke could be appropriate here, since neither black people nor Poles are known to have issues with men, unlike feminists.

      Third, my joke was not a joke about feminists. But of course it needs a minimum of thinking to recognize that.

      And it is a fact that for many men, a room full of feminists would be a hostile environment.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    8. Re:hostile environment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would be too easy...they would already be occupied...

    9. Re:hostile environment? by slick7 · · Score: 1

      "able to face environments which are hostile for men."

      So, like a room full of feminists?

      Since it is headless, would a shark's head help?

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    10. Re:hostile environment? by slick7 · · Score: 1

      AMEN!

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  2. According to Betteridge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No.

  3. No neck != headless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just paint a smiley on it :)

    IEEE video was underwhelming at first but then it quickly got extremely impressive: that's a very nice design they've got there, way more than is at first apparent. Only thing lacking is bouncing, jumping, and speed and it would fully live up to it's name.

    However the hand fingers need both individual base individual centre axis rotation as well as individual common centre axis rotation, the shown offset 2-1 grasp is good for some things, but an axially symmetric 1-1-1 is good for other things like picking up small objects like nuts (the metal kind) or small stones, and a linear 1-1-1 is good for picking up bars and tubes without chasing them all over the place (the human hand does this differently and imperfectly).

  4. Three-fingered limbs are better? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    So perhaps Homer Simpson might actually be well suited for working at, say, Fukashima?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Three-fingered limbs are better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Homer Simpson has four fingers on a hand. Which would mean, were he working at Fukushima, that he did something to annoy the mob...several times.

    2. Re:Three-fingered limbs are better? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Take a look... Three fingers and a thumb. It's even been used in jokes in the show.

      http://projectquinn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/homer-simpson.jpg

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Three-fingered limbs are better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you missed previous AC's point. 3+1 != 3

  5. How will they arm it? by vik · · Score: 1

    I presume someone is planning offensive capabilities to get the fuunding?

    Vik :v)

    1. Re:How will they arm it? by EmperorArthur · · Score: 2

      Don't hate on DARPA. However much you might dislike the USA or it's military, DARPA does a bunch of cool stuff. Quite a bit of which has nothing to do with weapons.

      In this case they want a robot that can go into areas with biological, chemical, or nuclear hazards and preform as well as a Human can. The Fukishima nuclear incident (or disaster if you prefer) showed why current robots suck. Imagine if one of these things was able to activate a pressure release valve. Even with some radioactive release, they could have avoided the hydrogen explosion.

      Oh, if you feel like bashing the US Government, then I'll go ahead and feed you. The keyword is "safety." According to politicians, no freedom, no cost* is too much. Everything is for a safer world.

      *All costs are billed to the US tax payer. Major campaign contributors should set up a meeting to discuss tax brakes to avoid these costs. Some "Truth Enhancement" may or may not be used. Read the full thousand page bill for details.

      --
      So lets pretend that we've just completed writing this code, as opposed to having just completed sabotaging it -Altera
    2. Re:How will they arm it? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Oh! If only someone were to apply the tax brakes.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:How will they arm it? by slick7 · · Score: 1

      I presume someone is planning offensive capabilities to get the fuunding?

      Vik :v)

      Yeah, Cyberdyne.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  6. Right turn Clyde by WinstonWoof · · Score: 2

    Anyone else notice its called Clyde in the illustration at the end of the video clip? :)

    1. Re:Right turn Clyde by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      Yeah I thought that was a nice touch. So they just want robot gardeners then?

  7. Grammar Enforcer Time by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

    should be: "able to face environments that are hostile to men"

    Also, the summary doesn't explain why they don't just send women to environments that are hostile to men.

    Don't make me do this again, Slashdot editors.

    1. Re:Grammar Enforcer Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haw haw!

      Although not so common in these modern times, "men" can also refer to humans in general. I'm willing to use the term and risk being branded a phallocratic raper of cis-gendered womyn.

  8. I never thought I'd hear the phrase by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Hey! We don't serve ttheir kind in HERE!!
    in my lifetime, but...

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    1. Re:I never thought I'd hear the phrase by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Sadly, some here are old enough to have heard such words. Sadder still, there may yet be some places where they still may be heard.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  9. Origin detected by paiute · · Score: 1

    This robot comes from Planet Clair. A place with pink air, all the trees are red, and no one ever dies. Ah, because they were all robots! Not it makes sense.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  10. Re:Law and Oder; JTS by paiute · · Score: 1

    The saddest part? You are not far off.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  11. Probably too late for this year by Animats · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The competition is in December 2013, and this team may not be ready by then. Here are the other robots being entered.

    The simulated challenge back in June revealed that the entrants' movement control software isn't very good yet. The winning team's simulated robot fell down 12 times. DARPA has posted only heavily censored videos of the results, possibly because they're so embarrassingly bad.

    Some of the blame attaches to the simulator used. The Gazebo simulator's physics engine, which is borrowed from video games, is not good enough for the job. Video game simulators use tricks that look OK, but aren't physically realistic. That's no good when you're using them to match a real robot, or even if you're doing control based on reported forces from the simulator. This should be fixed in early 2014 when they get an honest physics engine from Mike Sherman, who knows what he's doing. (If you need a accurate humanoid robot simulator right now, try OpenHRP3, from AIST in Japan.)

    I suspect that the December 2013 event, which will be public, will be rather disappointing. But the planned 2014 event may be very impressive.

    That's how it went with 2004 DARPA Grand Challenge for automatic driving, which was so pathetic it was covered by the Comedy Channel. Then in 2005, all the robot vehicles at the event could drive autonomously without running into anything and several finished the whole course with good times. The second day of the 2005 Grand Challenge was the moment when automatic driving became real to the world.

  12. Hazard Pay Required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Headless Ape robot will demonstrate its skill and dexterity by giving a 'hand-job' to the NASA Chief Executive in live online camera feed.

  13. The Ape-Robot of Sleepy Hollow by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

    Years ago my Dad oddly started referring to cordless phones as "headless phones" causing waves of shock and horror within our family. It is my hope that the ripples extend outward until they break across all cultures and languages, culminating in a universal oddity that science cannot explain.

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>