Slashdot Mirror


iFixit Tears Down the New Moto X, So You Don't Have To

iFixit's been breaking devices and voiding warranties for years now; latest on their chopping block is the new Moto X from Motorola, a phone hawked as much for its customizability and place of manufacture (the U.S.) as for anything else. You might expect a highly hyped, ultra-customizable phone to be made of high-end components and ultra-repairable as well. iFixit's teardown commentary has both some good and only-middlin' things to say about the innards, but very little bad. They call out the highly modular headphone jack, and say "a considerable amount of effort went in to the internal design of this device; the number of clips and contacts we've found so far is a great testament to that."

10 of 52 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Dice. by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 3, Informative

    They do teardown reports all the time. The site is oriented to people who want to repair gadgets. So what they're showing here is largely how to take the phone apart. It's also interesting to those of us who want to know how things are made and what components are in our stuff.

  2. Yes Yes and Yes by tuppe666 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...at least if Google/Motorola have done their Market research right. They have clearly created a phone that is easily put together, so you as a consumer can have a phone that matches your lifestyle (football team, car, personality or simply favourite colours), and Google still manages to assemble in America, with a JIT inventory and a 4 day turnaround.

    That and the the fact that everyone from large companies to small individuals often don't throw things away when they do break. This may be against Apple/Microsoft disposable electronics, but many here would prefer to fix something than throw it away...Its fun and rewarding. I just took my current phone apart to swap colours from black to white.

    The bottom line is this is a great phone; this is simply another feature.

  3. Gay for Google by tuppe666 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Will you ever stop sucking Googles cock? It's a remarkably average phone

    To put the Moto X some kind of perspective

    The iPhone 5
    ==========
    1.3Ghx dual-core CPU
    GPU (three cores) @325 MHz
    1GB LPDDR2-1066 RAM
    4 in (100 mm) diagonal 640 × 1,136 pixels (326 ppi)

    The Moto X
    =========
    1.7Ghz dual-core
    GPU (quad-core) @400 MHz
    2 GB LP-DDR2
    4.7 in (120 mm) diagonal 1280x720 (316 ppi)

    To put it in some kind of perspective it destroys Apples Flagship Phone. You are right though its not the fastest or has the most cores or is the largest *Android* Phone, but then it made the choice to focus on customising the phone and desirable features such as active notifications , focusing on what was important, and making an elegant phone...if they got their research right.

    You are not wrong, I have seen many features things on for example Nokia phones before they became another "Designed in" company, but then I like the old features like hardware keyboard(back on the droid), waterproofing(On the latest Sony Z), IR (on the HTC One)....now where are those Internal FM transmitters.

    1. Re:Gay for Google by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

      To put it in some kind of perspective it destroys Apples Flagship Phone.

      In what way exactly? Do you have performance numbers or are you just jacking off to the specs?

  4. Battery Replaceable by tuppe666 · · Score: 2

    That is a step backwards as far as i'm concerned.

    The fact that it is easily replaced is the point of this article. You do lost the ability to "carry" a spare battery, but hopefully Motorola having a focus on battery life by using two separate processors to help improve battery life.

    1. Re:Battery Replaceable by adolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So your definition of "easily replaced" == Get out plastic prying tools, and a tiny little Torx screwdriver, take apart a bunch of stuff that is glued together, replace battery, and then hope it gets back together properly?

      In my book, that level of pain is better described as "not user-serviceable."

      The best battery-operated pocket computer in terms of serviceability and durability I've ever had was a Handspring Visor.

      To change the batteries, you just opened the door on the back, and replaced the two AA batteries inside. This was only required once a month or so: I was never worried that I'd run out of battery while using it, but if I were, I could get a fresh set of batteries at even the most backwoods gas station/general store in a jiffy. To keep it in a pocket or a bag with lots of stuff, the included cover (which covered the whole front of the device) worked great, and stowed neatly on the back when the device was in use. To open the it up and expose the guts in the event that it needs fixing, you just unscrew the end of the included metal stylus to reveal a Philips screwdriver of just the right size, remove a few screws, and basic disassembly was complete. (Not that mine ever needed fixing, even after years of bouncing around in my cargo pocket with a pocket knife and/or various hand tools. I did note that after a year or two of being abused in ways that would make a modern pocket computer shatter, one of the screws did fall out. It didn't seem to mind.)

      Even backups on the Visor were easy: Drop it into the cradle, push sync the button, wait a short time, and done. The entire device could then be lost or destroyed, and total recovery (with a replacement in-hand) was just another sync away. Just try getting this level of functionality from an Android device. Seriously, go ahead and try. (I'll wait.)

      The included OS, while not "open" per se, was easily extensible by third-parties but also worked just fine without any extra help.

      Now, yes: It wasn't fast. But it handled text, calculations, passwords, and contacts very well. And it was actually useful for a quick sketch, since it was stylus-based. Which is most of what I actually need a pocket computer for, aside from Just Working.

      So are we moving backwards? In many ways that I think are important: Yes.

  5. Jobs Hates Flash by tuppe666 · · Score: 2

    Only a fanboy will overlook at the fact that the specs are more of a requirement of the OS than actually something useful

    Hold on there. A smart phone is more than an OS that is the point. The reason why Apple phones couldn't run Flash while Android phones could...is the something useful. The something useful is your first party...and your third party applications. Those specifications define how and what games can do. Apple already is missing out on whole countries worth of Applications...already fallen 100,000 applications behind Google, but it looks to be finding itself unable to run the latest games.

    1. Re:Jobs Hates Flash by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Informative

      The reason why Apple phones couldn't run Flash while Android phones could...is the something useful

      Except Adobe abandoned Flash on mobile devices - the latest you can get is 11.1 for Android 4.0.x. You can probably install it on Jelly Bean, but it isn't supported and given the way the default browser is Chrome...

      And they abandoned it because of the iPhone.

      The real question is - how does this phone compare to the Androids sold today. As in what Androids are currently selling. Is it going to move as many as the SGS3 (60M - best selling Android phone model) out of 900M Androids? It seems the vast majority of them aren't the flagship devices that we keep seeing, but all the various free ones (including the SGS*2* derived ones).

      Then there's the whole screen thing - if you want any Android phone with a screen smaller than 4.5", you're SOL. Poor processors, poor screens, poor memory... seems like no one wants a flagship phone with a smaller screen for those of us who prefer to use phones single-handedly.

  6. Well that didn't help by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Having twice the RAM and a somewhat faster processor does little for you if you need 4X the RAM and 2X the CPU to operate with the same level of performance.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  7. Re:iFixit it most useless website ever by GuB-42 · · Score: 2

    Samsung manages removable batteries quite well.
    Also, while most batteries can last for more than two years, they gradually decrease in capacity. Interestingly, people often blame software updates for the resulting decrease in battery life. By providing user replaceable batteries, it is possible to get back to full capacity and use the old battery as a spare. I did this for my last two phones.
    As for Li-ion batteries that actually wore out and got replaced, it happened on 3 devices : an MP3 player, a laptop and a phone.
    As for the safety argument, I don't buy it. Battery explosions are extremely rare and happen on genuine models as well.

    I agree with you that most people don't bother with tearing down and fixing anything. But some others do, even if it is just for fun, and for these people, iFixit is great. Don't call something useless just because it is only useful for a limited audience.