Slashdot Mirror


Report: Snowden Stayed At Russian Consulate While In Hong Kong

cold fjord writes "The Washington Post reports, 'Before American fugitive Edward Snowden arrived in Moscow in June — an arrival that Russian officials have said caught them by surprise — he spent several days living at the Russian Consulate in Hong Kong, a Moscow newspaper reported Monday. The article in Kommersant, based on accounts from several unnamed sources, did not state clearly when Snowden decided to seek Russian help in leaving Hong Kong, where he was in hiding in order to evade arrest by U.S. authorities on charges that he leaked top-secret documents about U.S. surveillance programs. ... he celebrated his 30th birthday at the Russian Consulate in Hong Kong, the paper said — though several days earlier he had had an anticipatory birthday pizza with his lawyers at a private house. ... The article implies that Snowden's decision to seek Russian help came after he was joined in Hong Kong by Sarah Harrison, a WikiLeaks staffer who became his adviser and later flew to Moscow with him. Harrison, the article suggests, had a role in the making the plans. ' More at the South China Morning Post."

23 of 107 comments (clear)

  1. The NSA is violating the Constitution by Subm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's interesting to learn about Snowden's eating pizza. It's exciting to know he's successfully evading getting caught.

    But the NSA is violating the Constitution, the executive branch is stepping on the gas to increase it, the legislative branch is asleep at the wheel, the judicial branch is represented by a few rubber stampers appointed by a Chief Justice who I don't think has the public's interests at heart, the fourth estate is facing persecution like never before, and the citizens are so materially comfortable they don't do anything.

    I feel like there's more of a story here than Snowden's pizza that might at least get the citizens a little less comfortable and a little more active.

    1. Re:The NSA is violating the Constitution by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      Oh, for mod points...

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:The NSA is violating the Constitution by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Snowden story is the tip of the iceberg. Whatever happens to him, whether he escapes the wrath of the US authorities or he gets caught and "rendered", will serve as a reminder to the world of what the US is turning (or has turned) into. His pizza, and whatever else he does, is very useful to know about in that respect: it keeps him in the limelight, and continues to discredit the administration.

      Incidentally, none of the US powers that be is "asleep at the wheel": they're all very actively working against their constituents and against the population to keep themselves and their rich friends rich and in power.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re:The NSA is violating the Constitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What can you expect when we've heard more of Snowden than the wrongs that he uncovered? The media did a great job at redirecting the interest in this story from the crime to the one who exposed it. The media is just as much a part of this machine against the man on the streets as is Obama or Bush.
       
      Not unlike their focus on Miley Cyrus while America is about to take yet another step into the realm of perpetual war.

    4. Re:The NSA is violating the Constitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's interesting to learn about Snowden's eating pizza. It's exciting to know he's successfully evading getting caught.

      But the NSA is violating the Constitution, the executive branch is stepping on the gas to increase it, the legislative branch is asleep at the wheel, the judicial branch is represented by a few rubber stampers appointed by a Chief Justice who I don't think has the public's interests at heart, the fourth estate is facing persecution like never before, and the citizens are so materially comfortable they don't do anything.

      I feel like there's more of a story here than Snowden's pizza that might at least get the citizens a little less comfortable and a little more active.

      No it's a fairly lame attempt by Cold Fjord to keep the Snowden story limping along so he can expose him as the treacherous bastard he really is. The grand old US of A is absolutely justified in spying on all citizens whether they are American or not, in order to protect the virtuous and unchallengable policies of the US Government and their absolutely legal and above-board (but necessarily and rightly completely secret and without accountability to anyone but themselves) spy agencies.

      Well done Cold Fjord, well done, I look forward to your righteous trolling of this article in the name of unwavering and unquestioning patriotism.

    5. Re:The NSA is violating the Constitution by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

      It's also about laying the ground work for an non-falsifiable claim that Snowden wasn't a young man with a conscience about massive illegal activities but instead a Russian spy.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    6. Re:The NSA is violating the Constitution by Teancum · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's interesting to learn about Snowden's eating pizza. It's exciting to know he's successfully evading getting caught.

      But the NSA is violating the Constitution, the executive branch is stepping on the gas to increase it, the legislative branch is asleep at the wheel, the judicial branch is represented by a few rubber stampers appointed by a Chief Justice who I don't think has the public's interests at heart, the fourth estate is facing persecution like never before, and the citizens are so materially comfortable they don't do anything.

      Except for the last part in regards to the citizens, I agree with you.

      Note also that the Chief Justice has very little actual authority except deciding very minor things that can also be overturned by the other justices... he is just the "first among equals" and his only real additional authority is to preside over the U.S. Senate in cases of impeachment of the President or Vice-President of the US.... and even that doesn't give him a vote since it requires a 2/3rd vote to accomplish anything in that situation other than for minor procedural and parliamentary rule issues. The Chief Justice also has the privilege by custom of being able to write the concurring or dissenting opinion (depending on his vote) for rulings made by the court. Then again, any justice can write such an opinion even if the the Chief Justice writes one too, so that is even minor. All judges are also appointed not by the Chief Justice, but by the President (and confirmed by the Senate). All the Chief Justice appoints are law clerks, staff, and having an influence on who is "admitted to the bar" and able to argue cases before the court.

      As for why citizens are apathetic about what is happening to the American government, it has nothing to do with the luxury lifestyle (or lack thereof) they are enjoying. The problem is that citizens no longer have any influence on their government and even elections themselves don't matter. The whole thing with regards to elections is that the whole system is corrupt. A video I saw recently (it isn't that new of a video) sort of explains the problem here:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ik1AK56FtVc

      I don't know if the solution presented here will work, but it is an interesting idea by itself. I certainly come from a different political perspective than the presenter, but completely agree with his conclusions on this particular matter.

    7. Re:The NSA is violating the Constitution by mbone · · Score: 2

      Note also that the Chief Justice has very little actual authority except deciding very minor things that can also be overturned by the other justices... he is just the "first among equals" and his only real additional authority is to preside over the U.S. Senate in cases of impeachment of the President or Vice-President of the US.... and even that doesn't give him a vote since it requires a 2/3rd vote to accomplish anything in that situation other than for minor procedural and parliamentary rule issues.

      No, that is not true in regards to the NSA. When it comes to FISA the SCOTUS Chief Justice is definitely not first among equals, but stands alone. From the FISC Wikipedia article :

      The FISA court's judges are appointed solely by the Supreme Court Chief Justice without confirmation or oversight by the U.S. Congress.

      (Or, any oversight from the other Justices either).

      I am sure this is what Subm was referring to

    8. Re:The NSA is violating the Constitution by Teancum · · Score: 2

      Interesting. I wonder how the Chief Justice can live with himself appointing such judges when that is clearly an unconstitutional act in and of itself? The more I hear about the FISA court, the more I hate it.

      Heck, Congress didn't even have the authority to even pass such legislation in the first place. Of course unconstitutional legislation doesn't really matter to those guys, or to the judicial system itself either. It still boils down to the fact that the American people are no longer citizens but rather subjects. That is also an authority that the founders and authors of the Constitution of 1787 never intended to give to the Chief Justice.

      For crying out loud, Congress has to confirm every 2nd Lieutenant, Ensign, and Postmaster of Podunksville. Why they gave up their role in confirming justices to this court is beyond stupid. Hell, how do these FISA judges even have any sort of legitimacy of any kind?

    9. Re:The NSA is violating the Constitution by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      The US is turning into what all governments eventually turn into; anyone who is shocked about the direction understands neither human nature nor history.

      Thats one of the reasons, when someone says "but maybe the [1st | 2nd | 4th | 5th] amendments are outdated and need repealing", you have to stand firm.

      Thats actually a large part of the reason I take the conservative "limit government as much as possible" stance. It surprises me continually that people will vote for an increase in government size and then act shocked when that power is abused; does one suppose that only large businesses abuse power given too freely?

    10. Re:The NSA is violating the Constitution by Antipater · · Score: 2

      it keeps him in the limelight, and continues to discredit the administration.

      Actually, an article like this helps the administration's angle. "He stayed at the Russian embassy" needs only the smallest of spin-jobs to become "He was working for the Russians the whole time."

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    11. Re:The NSA is violating the Constitution by jkflying · · Score: 2

      Obligatory SMBC.

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
  2. Why? by Korruptionen · · Score: 2

    Why is it that someone reveals exactly what we all had assumed was already going on for a long time... and people become obsessed with this person? Something isn't right about this who story.

    It's as if... he's... a plant or something.

    (flame suit activated.)

  3. Re:Good. by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Were you even alive during the Cold War? How in the hell is today's world worse than it was during the Cold War? If you think it's worse now and need a flashback reminder as to how half the planet lived back then go and live in fucking North Korea.

  4. This is bullshit Delivery, Propaganda style by Bucc5062 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll be clear, that article was a bunch of bullshit. Unnamed sources, conflicting stories, over the top innuendos that come together to to a good job of discrediting the man, thus his motive and his data. The story is a hack job of low hanging dfruit to get other media outlets an opportunity to shape or spin the idea that Mr. Snowden was not acting in the greater interests of the People, but was really "working for the Russians".

    " because Havana, under pressure from Washington, said it would not allow the plane to land."

    Are you serious. Cube caving to pressure from the United States? That is laughable. Russia maybe, the US...right

      "All I can say is that I have absolutely no idea about this," Ho said. "I was only his legal adviser and was not fully involved in his dealings." This from the local legal representative in Hong Kong. A person whom I would think likes to keep tabs on his very high profile client. Then this completely worthless statement

    "A spokeswoman for the consulate in Hong Kong would neither confirm nor comment on the report.". So that lends what to the the legitimacy of the story? Nothing, but it does what it always intends, casts doubt. "What are they hiding, he really must have been there otherwise they'd say he was not".

    The marketing department for the NSA and the US government is really starting to ramp up the spin. "Mr. Snowden must be a spy, he ran right to the communists.". "Mr. Snowden is a traitor for releasing secrets to our Russian enemies". Mr. Snowden is a terrorist because he helped them communicate better in secret" and the sad thing is the majority of the US (And world) population will buy the story hook line and sinker.

    Then on the other side, even my supposed thoughtful reporting NPR station put out anotehr fluff piece, this time about the NSA LOVEINT activities. The two reporters made it seem like a joke, a trivial action taken by so "oh so naughty" analysts instead of what it was, a sever breach of privacy; an act that would put an average citizen in jail under arrest. The NSA violated the privacy rights of American citizens and it is reported as "shame on you, don't do that again"...sigh.

    As a final point to the spin, Congress, coming back from break will not be able to investigate any violations to the Constitution by the NSA for the American public was just made aware the the Government "miscalculated" when we need to raise the debt ceiling and it needs to happen soon...let the hilarity begin. If that is not enough the President wants to shoot exploding objects into Syria which certainly means the media will be quite focused on anything but the NSA travails.

    Right now, everything said about Syria is close to a dup for Iraq before the war. Obama, the man who voted against action in Iraq now ponders whether to attack Syria. If Assad bombed his own people with gas then he is despicable, disgusting, and immoral and worthy to be brought to justice for war crimes and crime against humanity. Syria, like this article is just a tool to divert attention away from the systematic destruction of privacy in this country. Sad times. Sad times.

    --
    Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    1. Re:This is bullshit Delivery, Propaganda style by gallondr00nk · · Score: 2

      Then on the other side, even my supposed thoughtful reporting NPR station put out anotehr fluff piece, this time about the NSA LOVEINT activities. The two reporters made it seem like a joke, a trivial action taken by so "oh so naughty" analysts instead of what it was, a sever breach of privacy

      One element of propaganda is always humanising on side while demonising the other.

      The LOVEINT angle struck me as a very awkward and ill thought out way of trying to do that. A couple of the reports I read had a sort of "oh look, they're jealous insecure paranoids too!" ring about it, which was probably not the intention. I imagine a lot of people saw that for the flagrant abuse of power that it really was.

      It'll be fun playing "guess the planted story" over this, as they try and dress up the erosion of representative democracy as something good.

  5. Because. News Media by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's interesting that the best slur campaign the US can come up with involves Snowden eating pizza while trying to figure out where to run and hide. I don't give a flying f#ck if he lied, cheated and stole everything he turned over. The root of the matter is the NSA, and US government got caught with their hands full of illegal sh#t and many people in high place need to be held accountable. And that's not happening. In the meantime, the media is either trying to figure out how to spin this into reality tv for ratings. I can remember a day when the network news would have had a field day ripping apart all three branches of government over something like this. Instead, they carry on like a bunch of drama starved crack whores.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  6. Re:Good. by mrsquid0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Cold War was a terrifying time. It is not surprising that the Baby Boomers, who grew up during the worst of it, are such a screwed up generation. However, half the planet did not live like North Korea. North Korea has always been an extreme case. Much of the communist world, while far worse off than the west was, was better off than much of the third world at the time. That is one of the reasons that communism was appealing to many people in the third world. As hard as it may be to imagine, it was an improvement.

    --
    Just because you are paranoid does not mean that no-one is out to get you.
  7. Re:I doubt this. by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

    As soon as they gave him one years asylum he became a Russian pawn. What happens to him after the one year is up will now be determined at various negotiating tables where his fate will be just another bargaining chip.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  8. Enjoying the secrets trend by TheCarp · · Score: 2

    Not too long ago, this is the sort of revelation that would be in the public 30 years later.

    Its not just heros like Snowden who are leaking, the trend seems to be moving strongly towards the inability of large organizations to keep any real secrets at all. Nobody is giving up missle codes or anything legitimate, but.... lies told to the public seem to have a lot less staying power than they used to.

    I like this trend. May it continue for all of these orgs and may they have to eventually come to the conclusion that dealing honestly with the public is the only viable option in the future.

    I don't expect it but....I hope for it.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  9. Re:Good. by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 2

    Really, though, that's exactly the same as it is in the west.

    In the East, if you didn't respect the principles of the Soviet system, you got taken away.

    In the West, if you don't respect the principles of American capitalism, you get taken away.

    Or, to use a social rather than economic example, it's like whining that Saudi Arabia doesn't let women show off their hair, but having no problem with the fact that you'd get arrested in Washington for showing off your tits.

    We're living and breathing some system, and we've got so used to its rules that we're convinced that they're less arbitrary than the rules of any other system.

    Perhaps Western propaganda is more effective than Eastern, so there are fewer visible dissidents.

  10. Re:Good. by cavreader · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since you were alive to see the Cold War you must have been alive in 1983 when the world came the closest to unrestricted nuclear war in it's history. The Russians interpreted a US-NATO Nuclear War Game as being a cover for a real attack. They misinterpreted some sketchy radar returns that could have indicated real launches and they started arming there missiles for launch. While the Russians have always had a lot of intelligence operatives their main weakness back then was integrating and analyzing all the different pieces of information gathered by their agents to really see the big picture. In this case a Russian spy working as a NATO military staffer told his Russian superiors that the war game was not real and used the fact that Reagan was on a foreign visit and had the war game been real he doubted the US President would be anywhere other than a deep bunker somewhere in the US. The real scary thing was a Russian military officer who was part of the process of arming and releasing their nuclear weapons refused to authorize the release. This officer was later arrested and charged with crimes against the Russian state but he had his sentence silently commuted several years after the incident. So saying no one would launch nuclear weapons is a weak foundation for your argument.

  11. Re:Good. by tragedy · · Score: 2

    Are you talking about operation Able Archer, which featured, among other things, US bombers repeatedly flying directly at USSR airspace then pulling back at the last moment? One of the most idiotic ideas imaginable from testosterone-addled military "thinkers".