Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft and Google Challenge US Government Gag Orders

First time accepted submitter ace37 writes "Microsoft says it plans to move ahead with a lawsuit filed against the U.S. government in June to affirm the right of businesses to disclose limited information about government demands for data made under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). In separate legal filings, Microsoft and Google challenged the gag order that typically accompanies FISA demands for customer data. The two companies asserted that they have a First Amendment right to publish the total number of FISA requests received and the total number of user accounts covered by such requests."

9 of 115 comments (clear)

  1. To think Microsoft once ... by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    requested the ability to treat Windows security bug reporters as being in league with terrorists by invoking the Patriot Act.

    My head is spinning.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:To think Microsoft once ... by Curate · · Score: 3, Interesting

      requested the ability to treat Windows security bug reporters as being in league with terrorists by invoking the Patriot Act.

      Citation?

  2. Too little, too late... by SeaFox · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Gee, thanx Microsoft and Google, for doing something..

    Where were the Champions of Justice when these requests first started coming to you?
    I see. It's different now that you've been exposed to the public as cooperating in all this.

  3. Re:Good for the goose... by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why can't MS and Google publish "metadata" on the number of FISA requests and number of accounts requested?

    That sounds like a good way to end up on Double Secret Probation.

  4. Re:Thank you Edward Snowden by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No. Think about it for a moment.

    The NSA was within a hair's breadth of creating the most impressive cloud based uber-backup / social networking / information-wants-to-be-everywhere system ever devised. Had they had the sense to market it instead of hide it, people would have been all over themselves to sign up.

    Google and Microsoft have belatedly figured out that they're competing with the US Government. They didn't like that at all.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  5. Re:Here's hoping... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hope you're right in hoping for that. However, I feel that it'll be a catalyst for a nail in the coffin for this sort of "bitch". I mean to say that once there's a ruling in favor of the government's gag orders, there can be no more bitching.

    Another point to reflect on, is that they're "bitching" about posting numbers. Who the fuck cares about the numbers? If the government wants to see *my* data, then it'd be real fucking nice if *I* was told about it. So if my google account was needing to be "searched", I feel that google should give them the data, but then tell me, "Hey man, the government has been given your data. That'd end anyone's "bitch". But maybe google/MS would fear that the people would then want to know "what data". For instance, I'm really wondering what sort of data MS has on me, as I don't use any of their products.

  6. Re:Here's hoping... by icebike · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "This type of lawsuit can help regain some of the liberties the government has taken away FROM CORPORATIONS, or at least some of the transparency".

    FTFY

    Well, when you are served with a FISA order, we will worry about your liberties.

    In the mean time I'm pretty happy to have them pushing back, and I wish ALL the big companies would follow.
    There is no doubt they are seeing this as harmful to their business, because users feel betrayed.

    They need to push for revealing MORE information. For instance, EVERY USER, who's account was
    subject to such an order should be notified (after a suitable passage of time, 6 months seems right for most cases).
    The government would have to offer up this fact in Discovery if someone was subsequently charged, why should an innocent person deserve less?

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  7. Re:Let's see the others by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As long as you're not a whistleblower, its fine here!

    Or object to 'national security' bullshit.

    Or don't want to get groped at the airport.

    Or want to legitimately protest what's going on.

    Or....
    Or...
    Or..
    Or.
    Or
    o

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  8. Alternative solution by manu0601 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    An alternative solution: first break the gag order, then wait for government attacking in court, and then defend. Attacking for the right to speak seems a looser's position.