Slashdot Mirror


Russia Issues Travel Warning To Its Citizens About United States and Extradition

mendax writes "The New York Times reports that the Russian government is warning its citizens to not travel to countries that have an extradition treaty with the United States, noting that 'detentions of Russian citizens in various countries, at the request of American law enforcement, have become more frequent.' The article reports the Russian foreign ministry as saying,'Experience shows that the judicial proceedings against those who were in fact kidnapped and taken to the U.S. are of a biased character, based on shaky evidence, and clearly tilted toward conviction.'"

26 of 369 comments (clear)

  1. Times have changed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not too long ago that most people in the US would be worried about Russia being the bad guy in such situations.

    1. Re:Times have changed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I hate to break it to you but both nations of the cold war were bad guys and they (or their successors in the case of the Soviet Union) still are. Old trick of using external "foes" for control and limiting dissent and its impact. The meaningful major challenge as always is in creating and implementing reforms and making them stick to prevent backsliding to the bad old days.

    2. Re:Times have changed. by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mobster, businessman... a rose by a different name...

      It's not like the US went head over heels to prosecute the criminals that caused the current turmoil in our economy.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Times have changed. by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While there are certainly Russians that should be extradited to the US to stand trial, it's the United States that's abused their extradition powers, falsified evidence, and flat out lied to participating countries in order to arrest those whom there is little to no evidence against and are often being persecuted for political reasons. Remember, we have the highest incarceration rate in, not only the world, but all of human history. With that kind of record you have to see how a lot of countries would see our judicial system as a bit suspect as well. The Russians may protect their ultra rich from prosecution but we do exactly the same thing. To this day, not a single executive from the whole 2008 banking mess has even been indited, simply because the justice department didn't want to upset the markets. We are certainly no better than the Russians when it comes to justice, we're probably even worse.

  2. Stranger Than Fiction by wrackspurt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Once not long ago I would have laughed now I'm just sad.

  3. Re:Absolutely the case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please do not make this about "Right" vs "Left". Both parties love power, and don't really care about the citizens. When people bicker about "Right" vs "Left" it distracts from the real issues.

  4. Re:Shaky? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "No, but is an excellent propaganda phrase."

    Hmmm...

    prop a gan da noun
    information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to help or harm a person, group, movement, institution, nation, etc.

    How is this harmful? It appears to be simple truth.

  5. US Allies are starting to turn their backs on them by elashish14 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not that Russia was ever a major ally to the US, but more and more countries are ceasing to put up with the hostile nature of the US's foreign relations policy. The US is failing in all sorts of relations due to its policies on copyrights, "terrorism," worthless wars and drug enforcement, and increasingly, other nations are no longer putting up with it.

    Throughout its history, the US has more or less never had any interest in the well-being of other nations they enter relations with. Of course, you could perhaps say this is true of all nations. However, if the US is going to be so self-centered in its relations, then the best thing for the world is for them to have less of an influence in strong-arming other nations into agreeing with them. This influence historically has come largely from dominating economic pressure, but we'll see if it lasts - hopefully it doesn't. The last thing the world needs is to become more like the US.

    --
    I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
  6. Re:Absolutely the case by Puls4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Your comment will probably get a lot of responses, just because of the hatred and misinformation that it contains. I'm not fan of the far left (nor the far right), but let's for a minute remember who created the department of homeland security. George W. Bush. Let's also take a look at who created the TSA. George W. Bush. Who signed the Patriot Act into law? George W. Bush. I don't know about you, but I don't think any of the people listed above are part of the 'Extreme Left'. Yet somehow the people I listed above have done a fabulous job restricting freedom. I'm not really interested in left or right. I just find it sad that people like you can't distinguish the forest through the trees: ALL our politicians have contributed to this problem. The sad fact remains: Russia is right. We are becoming a police state, especially with regards to extradition and our borders where we claim our laws don't apply.

  7. Bah by frovingslosh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pay it no attention. Next thing you know the Ruskies will claim that America spies on its own citizens.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  8. Re:Absolutely the case by jkauzlar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Courtesy of the extreme Left...

    I'm not sure what the vegans and homosexuals have to do with this, but if i remember, a lot of this started under bush and has been embraced wholeheartedly by the present administration. If you think this is about left vs. right, you don't understand american politics.

  9. Re:Biased charges, clearly tilted toward convictio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Forgot GITMO and the number of people detained there without ever having seen a judge, or a lawyer?

    A country where you can be taken off the street without any cause, just by labeling you a 'terrorist' sounds just like the Soviet Union, North Korea and Nazi Germany..

  10. What the hell happened to my country? by He+Who+Has+No+Name · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These are the kinds of warnings WE used to give about RUSSIAN satellite nations.

    This is all turning into a bad dream...

  11. Re:Absolutely the case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The extreme left? In the USA? Are you serious? To what very limited extent there even is a left in the USA it's what Europeans call the center or center-right...and this teabaggery gets modded up on /. What's next, Glenn Beck's goldline scam being pushed as sound investment and a top story? Weeping Jesus on the Cross what the Hell's happened to this place?

  12. Re:Shaky? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Propaganda works best where you have at least an element of truth. The conviction rates, sentences and so on for the poor and rich in the US legal system are extremely different (look also at black vs white). Imagine how much worse it is for a poor (relative to the USA - he could be pretty rich at home) Russian who doesn't properly speak English and has the huge psychological pressure of having nobody nearby he knows at all.

    Simple fact: the US legal system is deeply scary; there is a huge false conviction rate. Remember what we are always told, death sentences are the ones that are most investigated and are 100% sure. The innocence project shows the US has a minimum of a 12% false conviction rate for death sentences; other crimes must be much worse. Unlike people convicted before DNA evidence, nothing new will show up after the fact to save you.

    Most convictions in the US are "shaky" and many are simply wrong. I'm sure it's even worse in most of Russia, but if you are having to compare yourself with Russia then you have already gone mad.

  13. Re:Absolutely the case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That is exactly his point. Both sides of politics are at fault.

  14. Re:Shaky? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since when has the truth not been harmful in diplomacy, politics, or espionage?

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  15. Warning only for people known to be wanted by U.S. by dunkindave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The summary says "the Russian government is warning its citizens to not travel to countries that have an extradition treaty with the United States", but the article says:

    "The Russian Foreign Ministry posted advice of a somewhat different nature on Monday, cautioning people wanted by the United States not to visit nations that have an extradition treaty with it."

    Unfortunately, that small omission significantly changes the meaning of the line.

  16. Re:Biased charges, clearly tilted toward convictio by nbauman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A totalitarian state is one in which people used to say, "It can't happen here."

  17. Re:In Soviet Russia.. by MikeBabcock · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As I recall, the US now basically holds the position that anyone can break American law anywhere in the world and may be prosecuted for such as soon as the opportunity presents itself.

    I'm certain someone else can come up with chapter and verse ...

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  18. Re:Shaky? by Genda · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem with false conviction actually involves a variety of issues, incredibly poor handling of eye witnesses, prosecuting attorneys counting coup towards political advancement and the punishment proffered on innocent defendants who refuse to plea out because of their innocence (and conversely innocent defendants that choose to plea out rather that face draconian sentences.)

    All off this is weighted heavily against poor. Public defense is a joke in most states, and nonexistent in the very places it's most needed. Our system has slowly been reworked to criminalize poverty, mental illness and public protest. I can understand the informed of other nations wondering what the hell happened to the USA. I know I do.

  19. Re:Shaky? by umghhh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My thoughts exactly. It seems to me that US System has many flaws - no system is perfect but here the system is bad by principle - especially in drug cases. But even in normal criminal case not associated with drugs you may come to be offered confession for limited sentence or face a chance of losing the trial and getting much worse sentence because you were fighting it - how this has anything to do with justice I am not sure. Of course purpose of such solutions is not justice but efficiency i.e. making people motivated to settle down to save money for the state i.e. tax payer. This is not working properly because public prosecutors need convictions not justice. That is more efficient for them and their office. But what do I know - I am just a commie from an old continent....

  20. The sad part about all of this by korbulon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is the realization that the differences between Russia and the US are no longer a matter of type, but of degree.

  21. Re: Absolutely the case by Alioth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Where was all this outrage and demand to bomb when the rebels used nerve gas back in May?

    Both sides in the Syrian conflict are baddies. It's a bit hypocritical to bomb the Syrian government for using chemical weapons when we ignored the rebels doing the same.

  22. Re:Shaky? by cas2000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    cost cutting is part of the reason, but increasing the conviction rate is a much bigger part, it justifies the system because there's quantifiable "proof" that it's working - they must have been guilty, if they confessed or plead guilty.

    it's also useful politically, to make people or organisations seem "tough on crime".

    IMO, plea bargaining should be illegal with severe penalties for prosecutors who offer it.

    at the very least, the fact that a deal was offered should be enough to reduce all charges and potential sentencing to the offer as a *maximum* - the cops/prosecutor wouldn't have offered it if they thought it was too lenient for the crime.

    FWIW, I live in a country where such evil shit either doesn't happen or isn't common enough to be a noticable problem - although cops here (as everywhere) always pile on resist arrest/assault police charges just because they can - it's your word against theirs, and they are presumed to be honest by the courts.

    The very thought of a "justice" system where it is considered *normal* to use the threat of insanely harsh penalties to coerce a guilty plea fills me with horror.

    but then, our legal system isn't politicised - deliberately so, with clear and jealously guarded separation of powers - and we don't do stupid things like elect senior cops or judges. ours are professionals that work their way up through the ranks, not demagogues - which has problems of its own, but IMO they're nowhere near as bad as the problem of illiterate, incompent, prejudiced morons being elected just because they're popular or good at lying in public.

    I remember all the american anti-russian, anti-soviet, anti-communist propaganda from when i was growing up in the 70s and 80s - there isn't a single shitful thing that the evil russians were accused of then that you americans aren't doing - or exceeding - now, and with far greater efficiency due to modern computers and technology.

  23. Re:Shaky? by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since we learned to cover it with so much bull and feelgood words that it doesn't matter anymore. We don't invade countries anymore, we join a peacekeeping mission, and after we won (sorry, after we reestablished peace) we don't occupy it, we establish a military presence in the area. There we don't infiltrate enemy groups and commit worse atrocities against the civilians than they do to convince them we're also some of the "bad guys", so we can ferret out their leaders for assassination, we engage in covert operations where we have to regretfully accept inevitable but necessary drawbacks for the local population, to enable us to identify top terrorists to neutralize them. And we don't do that with carpet bombing from unmanned drones where we fire at the least hunch that there might be someone we want to hit in the area, we launch preemptive strikes against the terrorist strongholds using top of the line equipment to protect the lives of our men and women serving in our military...

    Need I go on or do you simply want to watch the News for more drivel like that?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.