Slashdot Mirror


Chris Kraft Talks About The Decline of NASA

schwit1 writes in with a link to a recent interview with Chris Kraft, founder of Mission Control, discussing the impracticality of the SLS, and why the best and brightest are slowing leaving NASA. From the article: "The problem with the SLS is that it's so big that makes it very expensive. It's very expensive to design, it's very expensive to develop. When they actually begin to develop it, the budget is going to go haywire. They're going to have all kinds of technical and development issues crop up, which will drive the development costs up. Then there are the operating costs of that beast, which will eat NASA alive if they get there. ... You go talk to the guys who were doing Constellation (NASA's now-scuttled plan to return to the moon), and the reason they came to NASA was to go back to the moon. They're all leaving now. The leaders are leaving for a lot of other reasons also, but they're leaving because there's no future that they want to be involved in. And that's unfortunate."

2 of 262 comments (clear)

  1. Can't fund NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Didn't you hear? There are brown people on the other side of the world!

    We need to invest in killing them before they kill each other, because if they kill each other and we don't save them from killing each other by killing them then

    And we've also got to invest in storing everyone's email, because

    And, you know, the IRS needs to buy more ammo so they're ready to

    Did I mention they're Muslim? The brown people!

  2. Re:But but but...... by Daemonik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The government provides the mission and funding, the private sector does what it does best.

    Bribe senators & congressmen for contracts, inflate the costs to double or triple original estimates, deliver 20 years after spec while milking every dollar they can from the government? So, you want to turn NASA into the Defense Industry II?