Slashdot Mirror


Intel Launches Core I7-4960X Flagship CPU

MojoKid writes "Low-power parts for hand-held devices may be all the rage right now, but today Intel is taking the wraps off a new high-end desktop processor with the official unveiling of its Ivy Bridge-E microarchitecture. The Core i7-4960X Extreme Edition processor is the flagship product in Intel's initial line-up of Ivy Bridge-E based CPUs. The chip is manufactured using Intel's 22nm process node and features roughly 1.86 billion transistors, with a die size of approximately 257mm square. That's about 410 million fewer transistors and a 41 percent smaller die than Intel's previous gen Sandy Bridge-E CPU. The Ivy Bridge-E microarchitecture features up to 6 active execution cores that can each process two threads simultaneously, for support of a total of 12 threads, and they're designed for Intel's LGA 2011 socket. Intel's Core i7-4960X Extreme Edition processor has a base clock frequency of 3.6GHz with a maximum Turbo frequency of 4GHz. It is easily the fastest desktop processor Intel has released to date when tasked with highly-threaded workloads or when its massive amount of cache comes into play in applications like 3D rendering, ray tracing, and gaming. However, assuming similar clock speeds, Intel's newer Haswell microarchitecture employed in the recently released Core i7-4770K (and other 4th Gen Core processors) offers somewhat better single-core performance."

3 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. Another marginal perf iteration of Core by JoeyRox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's laughable how small the performance gains are between recent generations of Core processors. I realize there are other improvements like power consumption and integrated GPU performance but the desktop gamer isn't going to drop another grand to save watts or get better performance on an IGPU he never will use anyway.

    1. Re:Another marginal perf iteration of Core by gweihir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are two reasons:
      1) AMD is really behind after they reworked their architecture, hence no pressure on Intel.
      2) Moore's Law has ended some time ago on a per-core basis and nobody noticed.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:Another marginal perf iteration of Core by JoeyRox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure, I'll tell you again. Even though the power consumption drops for each new process shrink the heat drop isn't commensurate because the transistors are packed more tightly together. Do a search online about how poorly Ivy Bridge OC's vs Sandy Bridge on a relative CPU frequency basis.