Slashdot Mirror


Using Raspberry Pi and iOS App To Catch Rhino Poachers

v3rgEz writes "Cambridge Consultants has rigged together about a hundred motion-triggered cameras around Kenyan watering holes to help catch and dissuade elephant poachers. 'The challenge was to create a remote monitoring system that was robust enough to withstand extreme weather conditions and animal attacks and could be easily hidden in any surroundings – all within the available budget,' according to one of the projects leads. And to help make sure all those cameras are being monitored, the team has released an iOS app that lets users review, tag, and flag images, tracking what kinds of animals pass by and keeping an eye open for any human predators on the prowl."

10 of 52 comments (clear)

  1. Useful app... For poachers by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nice idea, but won't this help poachers as well? At the least the public app will help them to locate
    - elephants
    - park rangers
    - the cameras themselves

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  2. "about a hundred" == I can't resist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    99 raspberry pi(e)s in the outback, 99 raspberry pi(eeeeeeeeee)s...
    (poachers|rhinos|monkeys) take one down and smash it around...
    98 raspberry pi(e)s in the outback...

    Come on guys; sing it with me!

  3. power vs. discreet durability? by SpzToid · · Score: 2

    Reading TFA I understand they are using a mesh of Raspberry Pis that can sense motion and subsequently sending (at-least) a still image to a server somewhere. The same unit is also monitoring sound so the network can triangle gunshots using microphones (for an immediate police response). And obviously these units must be durable and low maintence.

    What I'd like to know is how are they drawing power while remaning hidden? It seems solar *has* to be part of the equation, hasn't it? I can't see how they power those rasberry Pis + transmitters.

    --
    You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
  4. ulterior motives by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    i looked up what the penalty for poaching is an found out some interesting info.

    - wildlife tourism is the backbone of the Kenyan economy
    - before last June (2013), the punishment was a fine of around $480 and maximum jail time of two years, which were very rarely imposed.
    - at the start of June, Kenyan parliament changed the fine for poaching to a $120,000 fine and a potential 15-year jail sentence.

    Kenya only has 8,500 elephants and 1,025 rhinos. if you think the punishment is too harsh then you should consider that poaching is destroying an essential part of their economy. honestly, i think the punishment should even higher because it's equivalent to economic treason. i say treason because when the animals are (nearly) wiped out, tourists will go to other countries and give money to them instead.

    if you have obstinate views on ethics and morality, you should stop reading here and if you are a mod, remember there is no "-1 I disagree!"

    i'm no tree hugger but there is also the consideration of what is the value of a human criminal (extremely common) versus the value of one of these animals (very rare in comparison). if you REALLY want to get the message across (desperate times call for desperate measures?) then having public executions for poachers seem like it would be a sizable deterrent for teens who want to make a quick buck (ivory is >$1000/kilo). it's an issue of ethics and morality: for the good of the state versus the good of the individual.

    feel free to mod "+1 OMG WTF?!"

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:ulterior motives by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

      dammit, the link got killed.
      info about the new laws: http://www.takepart.com/article/2013/05/31/rhino-poaching-in-kenya

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    2. Re:ulterior motives by solarissmoke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you REALLY want to get the message across (desperate times call for desperate measures?) then having public executions for poachers seem like it would be a sizable deterrent for teens who want to make a quick buck (ivory is >$1000/kilo)

      If only it were that simple. The poaching industry is not built around a bunch of hoodlums with guns making a "quick buck". It goes all the way up to the highest levels of government, with lots of people taking their cut along the way. There is complicity by people at all the stages of the process of getting the horns/tusks from the animal to the people who consume it. And if you think only poor people are involved in poaching, you couldn't be further from the truth.

      There are insiders in the very organisations that are supposed to be protecting the animals who leak information to the poachers so they know when and where to strike without being caught. There are crooked officials at customs checkpoints who let the illicit goods through the ports. There are politicians and lawmakers who are handsomely rewarded for not enforcing existing punishments and not instituting harsher ones. Punishing the guy who pulls the trigger, however harshly, isn't going to stop all of this. He will be replaced by someone else equally desperate for money. And where poverty is rife, it's always worth the risk.

      There are some more realistic ways to address to the problem:

      • - Try and educate the ignorant people in China and other (mostly far-Eastern) countries who think horns and tusks have magical powers (I am not optimistic about this, but hey, we have to try).
      • - Research ways to artificially create horn/tusk material in the lab (similar to what was done with pearls), and flood the market with it so that the value of the product plummets.
      • - Work on making the living animals more valuable to the local community. Engage them in conservation efforts and make sure they receive a meaningful portion of the income from tourism activity. There are efforts being made to do this but the government could do a lot more.

      Unfortunately all of these things take time, which is fast running out.

    3. Re:ulterior motives by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      - Research ways to artificially create horn/tusk material in the lab (similar to what was done with pearls), and flood the market with it so that the value of the product plummets.

      That's done wonders for the jewelery industry. Lab grown precious stones and pearls have made the real ones dirt cheap and so affordable that everyone owns large collections of them. Or not.

    4. Re:ulterior motives by Petfish · · Score: 2

      I really thought that the advent of viagra - i.e. something that actually worked - would take the steam out of the market for rhino horn. It didn't. I don't know how you educate for that.

  5. Wasteful by BitZtream · · Score: 2

    The cost of a raspberry pi, ANY sort of wireless connection and ANY camera alone are going to exceed the cost of ready made wildlife camera.

    He'll the local sporting goods store sells wifi enabled animal cams for well under $100. You'd want something other than wifi for ranges needed on the savanna, but I can't imagine asking a manufacture for a deal in exchange for publicity wouldn't have resulted in a far better solution for less money and certainly far less total cost.

    Stop trying to shoehorn a raspberry pi into every space. This is a shitty hack.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    1. Re:Wasteful by Cruciform · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Show me a retail camera that triangulates gunshots.
      And if you can, which I doubt, make sure it's under the 100 dollars amount you refer to.

      You didn't read the article, you made an ass of yourself, and then tried to off-load your own ignorance.

      You failed.