Slashdot Mirror


Linus Responds To RdRand Petition With Scorn

hypnosec writes "Linus Torvalds, in response to a petition on Change.org to remove RdRand from /dev/random, has lambasted the petitioner by called him ignorant for not understanding the code in the Linux Kernel. Kyle Condon from the UK raised a petition on Change.org to get Linus to remove RdRand from /dev/random in a bid 'to improve the overall security of the linux kernel.' In his response, Torvalds asked Condon and the supporters of the petition to gain an understanding of Linux drivers and cryptography, and then 'come back here and admit to the world that you were wrong.' Torvalds stressed that kernel maintainers knew what they were doing and the petitioner didn't. Torvalds, in a similar outburst just yesterday, hoped that 'ARM SoC hardware designers all die in some incredibly painful accident.' This came in response to a message from Kevin Hilman when he noted that there were quite a few conflicts in the ARM SoC pull request for Linux 3.12 which were a result of the platform changes conflicting with driver changes going in to the V4L tree."

2 of 566 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Negotiation Skills by Goaway · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There was no negotiation going on. There was a single obnoxious guy calling Linux "an approved partner of the NSA" and complaining about something he knew nothing about. He deserved what he got. In fact, Linus went pretty easy on him.

  2. Re:Excuses, excuses, excuses ! by vux984 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Open source is just that, you can read the source of the programs

    I believe the suspicion is the RDRAND cpu instruction itself is a black box from intel that may have been subverted by the NSA.

    As such, no, it can't be audited, and it's source cannot be inspected.