Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Bomb Defuse Simulator 2013: a Head-Tracking Tech Demo

Posted by Soulskill on from the baby-steps-to-a-holodeck dept.

New submitter Johnny G. Mills writes "During a gamejam (an event to quickly develop and build an interesting game), two members of Sassybot Studio used a projector, Microsoft Kinect, and two moving boxes to create a simulator for defusing a bomb. They used me as a test subject, and thought Slashdot would enjoy this convergence of tech and gaming. 'The wires generated in Bomb Defuse Simulator 2013 are created procedurally to provide the player with a random challenge each time the game is played. ... The controls in the game are split up into physical input and Xbox controller input. With physical input the player moves around the bomb to see what is happening. This is literally done by walking around the real environment ... In our case we projected onto cardboard boxes to prove the concept. In theory this concept can be applied to larger and more unconventional objects. Doing so will challenge the game designer with utilizing the real space in order to create a game in virtual space.'"

27 of 35 comments (clear)

  1. now just wait by ganjadude · · Score: 5, Funny

    til he get arrested for teaching xbox players how to defuse a bomb. I mean that HAS to be worse than teaching someone how to beat a polygraph right??

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  2. Sounds like a blast! by hedgemage · · Score: 4, Funny

    (sorry)

  3. slight difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Beating a polygraph is a lie.
    Beating a bomb is life.

    (And you never know when you're going to be in a blockbuster movie; that's how the heroes learned to defuse, I suspect.)

    1. Re:slight difference by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      polygraph != truth vs lie, just to be clear, having said that wooooosh

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  4. Re:At first... by solidraven · · Score: 1

    No no no, that's what the internet is for.

  5. Who uses wires in bombs? by gweihir · · Score: 2

    That is soooo yesterday and might get you shot if you carry it around! http://hackaday.com/2008/09/19/boston-led-sweatshirt-arrestee-interviewed/

    Modern bombs use wireless tech and there is nothing to cut! Instead you have to figure out how to exactly fold and insert a piece of tin-foil.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Who uses wires in bombs? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Modern bombs use wireless tech and there is nothing to cut!

      I've never heard of wireless bomb detonators. You do realize that there is some substantial energy to be delivered into the detonator? It's not just a signal, the wires form a power circuit.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Who uses wires in bombs? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      And the second one with a broken satire-detector.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:Who uses wires in bombs? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Given how many people harbor incredible misconceptions about all things explosive, there's bound to be a lot of false positives and negatives in that area. ;-)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Who uses wires in bombs? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Well, yes. I though it was completely obvious how stupid it would be to attach a timer wireless to a detonator (because that means the detonator will be several orders of magnitude more complex than the plain timer), but apparently many people without even the slightest clue of how these things work make themselves even more clueless because they think they have a clue. Dunning-Kruger effect at work. Explains a lot.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:Who uses wires in bombs? by Mathinker · · Score: 1

      It is possible to make a totally wireless chemical detonator by using something like, for example, gelatin-coated sodium metal in hydrogen peroxide (+ an appropriately heat-sensitive primary explosive), or possibly some other kind of coated metal + picric acid. I don't think it's recommended except in circumstances where it would be impossible to use a wired detonator --- the exact detonation time would be quite unpredictable.

  6. What is old is new again by djupedal · · Score: 1

    Rocky's Boots in virtual space...

  7. Walkthru (Spoilers!) by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

    It's always the red wire.

    --
    It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
    1. Re:Walkthru (Spoilers!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, because not all wires are functional. Some of tem are 'sabotage' wires which make the bomb explode instantly if cut. At least that's how alarm systems work, only instead of cutting the correct wire out of 5, you have to guess the correct 5 out of 40.

    2. Re:Walkthru (Spoilers!) by cusco · · Score: 1

      No, alarm systems do NOT work that way. I work on them for a living. There are only two wires, but in a good installation the circuit will be "supervised" with two 1k resistor packs. The system sees 1k of resistance and knows that the switch at the other end is open. 2k of resistance says the switch is closed. 0k resistance is an 'open line fault' and says the wire has been tampered with.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    3. Re:Walkthru (Spoilers!) by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Maybe if you had non-metallic scissors, but with metal ones, that would almost guarantee a detonation.

      Short-circuited circuits usually don't work, regardless of whether the power load is a light bulb or a bridge wire in the detonator.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Walkthru (Spoilers!) by Nrrqshrr · · Score: 1

      I always wondered whether I had a fascination with all this because it's something excitingly forbidden, or because I have a freaking pyromaniac asleep inside of me.

  8. Moron by MajVariola · · Score: 1

    You're a moron. Any freshman can design a detonation system and perform the chemistry to null your system. Folks in glass empires ought not fly drones. Do the math.

    1. Re:Moron by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      You're a moron.

      Who's a moron?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  9. So... which one to cut? by c0lo · · Score: 1

    (sweating over a trope)

    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  10. Pop quiz, hotshot by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    There's a bomb on a bus. Once the bus goes 50 miles an hour, the bomb is armed. If it drops below 50, it blows up. What do you do? What do you do?

    1. Re:Pop quiz, hotshot by Osgeld · · Score: 2

      shoot the hostage, duh.

  11. IS it realistic enough by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Is it realistic enough to prepare us against the muzzie threat?

  12. Re:Live or die by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

    What if they're all blue wires?

    --
    No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
  13. Re:Live or die by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

    You know, that was a great thing about James Cameron’s Abyss. Bud, the hero, is in the dark and needs to cut the red wire but all of the wire are white due to the green chem light that he is using.

  14. Re:Live or die by neminem · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that is one of my favorite examples of playing with the Wire Dilemma trope, too. Though the Castle episode was fun, too. "Well, one of them had to be the right one."

  15. the Boston version? by cellocgw · · Score: 1

    Which is to say, is there a "LiteBrite" mode?

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw