Slashdot Mirror


Space Food From Space Farms

Modern Farmer magazine has an article about NASA's efforts into growing food in space, a slow, difficult process that's nonetheless necessary if humanity is to have any significant presence away from Earth's surface. Quoting: "This December, NASA plans to launch a set of Kevlar pillow-packs, filled with a material akin to kitty litter, functioning as planters for six romaine lettuce plants. The burgundy-hued lettuce (NASA favors the 'Outredgeous' strain) will be grown under bright-pink LED lights, ready to harvest after just 28 days. NASA has a long history of testing plant growth in space, but the goals have been largely academic. Experiments have included figuring out the effects of zero-gravity on plant growth, testing quick-grow sprouts on shuttle missions and assessing the viability of different kinds of artificial light. But [the Vegetable Production System] is NASA's first attempt to grow produce that could actually sustain space travelers. Naturally, the dream is to create a regenerative growth system, so food could be continually grown on the space station — or, potentially, on moon colonies or Mars. ... Plant size is a vital calculation in determining what to grow on the space station, where every square foot is carefully allotted. Harvest time is also of extreme importance; the program wants to maximize growth cycles within each crew’s (on average) six-month stay."

21 of 168 comments (clear)

  1. Fertilizer... by Joce640k · · Score: 2

    What will they use as fertilizer?

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:Fertilizer... by ketomax · · Score: 2

      MANure

    2. Re:Fertilizer... by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 3, Informative

      I suppose you mean humanure. See the Humanure Handbook. Not exactly rocket science, and it is widely tested on earth.

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    3. Re:Fertilizer... by deburg · · Score: 2

      This reminded me of an old SF story by Asimov. Humans stranded on hostile environment planet, struggling to terraform the environment. Dying one by one, their bodies finally providing the soil for the earth seedstock, but alas not in time for the last survivor. Sniff.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Founding_Father_(short_story)

    4. Re:Fertilizer... by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Informative

      Full text of the story, thank you, that was one I hadn't seen.

  2. Vertical or Urban Farms? by delt0r · · Score: 2

    I would be more interested in terrestrial applications. Removing pressure on habitats or even letting current farmland revert back to natural habitats would have a large impact on the plasticity of many ecosystems. In short making them more robust to changes in climate for example.

    --
    If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    1. Re:Vertical or Urban Farms? by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Why? Earth hydroponics already works fantastically. We already have the technology to do it here significantly more efficient. I can grown in a 20X60 greenhouse enough food to easily feed 20 people. The problem is that it's more expensive and takes more labor. 14 foot tall tomato plants take a lot of care, you havet orun pumps 24/7, etc...

      It's a lot cheaper to just spread seed over a giant farm ad hope for the best.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  3. per square foot or square meter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Plant size is a vital calculation in determining what to grow on the space station, where every square foot is carefully allotted. "

    Square ft on the US part of ISS, square meters (or square decimeters) on the Russian/European parts

  4. Spacecraft are Three Dimensional by barlevg · · Score: 2

    every square foot is carefully allotted

    Shouldn't that be CUBIC foot (or, more likely, meter, as the AC above pointed out)? Square footage is only a good measure when you're tethered to the floor.

  5. Re:Wasted effort by somersault · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Machines don't need bodies at all. In fact, machines don't want or need anything. Humans are curious though, and like to do essentially pointless things just because we can. So we're going to have our biosphere in space.

    Besides, the Singularity is just about AI. It doesn't follow that humans are immediately going to go extinct. We may have decent cyborg bodies before then anyway, and so could reduce our food/air/water requirements too.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  6. oxigen by Thanshin · · Score: 2

    Will this bring a significant improvement in oxygen recycling?

    1. Re:oxigen by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not yet. Eventually, yes. They could grow basil onboard the station. Basil respirates all night (baby) and it's edible and has a ton of health benefits, so it's a logical choice.

      However, it makes less than no sense to grow in a soil-like medium. They should be using aeroponics. Growing in any solid medium at all is just fucking stupid, because it's unnecessary mass.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:oxigen by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      They are looking to reduce maintenance and power use. Aero and hydroponics requires constant power. Dirt medium does not.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:oxigen by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 3, Informative

      Aeroponics has containment issues. If you're misting water constantly, it's going to go everywhere. In fact it's probably not going to behave quite right either since the water doesn't fall - droplets can aggregate and just float around forever. So you're then looking at a complex vacuum system to keep the water moving through properly.

      Much easier just to absorb it into something near the plant roots.

  7. Re:Wasted effort by fritsd · · Score: 2
    --
    To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
  8. Re:Eating space food from space farms, by JustOK · · Score: 2

    don't hit the alt space bar

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  9. Why are they using LED lights? by DeathToBill · · Score: 2

    It's not like they're further from the sun. So why not grow it using sunlight?

    --
    Slashdot - News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters, in ISO-8859-1 Has just realised that beta makes this signature redundant
  10. Re:Eating space food from space farms, by JustOK · · Score: 2

    I drink at the space bar alot. But sometimes I step away from the keyboard and drink somewheres else.

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  11. Re:Wasted effort by khallow · · Score: 2

    I think it's a waste of time trying to solve issues of maintaining a biosphere in space, when a push into space will be much easier after we've reached the Singularity: machine bodies don't need food, air or water.

    I was told back in 2000 that the Singularity would solve the problem of cheap access to space in twenty years. So we have about seven years to go.

    Second, we are already machines. But machines that happen to need food, air, and water. There's no particular reason to wait for the Singularity to do things which we can do now.

  12. No need for fertilizer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The soil replacement substrate they are testing (arcillite) is highly absorbent and probably is pretreated with the fertilizers. I know that similar experiments (SVET, russian ) were done on the Russion Mir station (my father was leading the team that developed the soil substrate). They used naturally occurring mineral (zeolite) which is extremely good absorbent. You can pretreat it with a fertilizer mix and it will leach small amounts of nutrients and support plant growth for years. All you need to do is add water. The zeolite is also very light - the dry stones will actually float when placed in water, until they absorb enough of it to sink. The zeolites and I assume the arcillite substrate that NASA is testing can also serve as base for soil formation. On long missions you can mix them with waste and let it rot. Because of their absorbent properties the zeolites will actually reduce the smell that comes out of the mix. I would guess that in a confined box with no external supply of fresh air, this would be quite an advantage.

    Here are some references for the substrate description and the experiment results.

  13. That seems great until stage 2: Cooking! by scorp1us · · Score: 2

    How the heck are you to make any kind of food other than raw in space? Your microwave oven is going to take 1kW, and you'll get mushy carrots at best. How do you dice in 0g? What about stir-fry? That seems very messy!

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.