Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Trove of NSA Documents and FISC Opinions Declassified Thanks to EFF Lawsuit

Posted by Unknown on from the what-is-truth dept.

An anonymous reader writes "Thanks to an EFF lawsuit, the office of the Director of National Intelligence is releasing declassified redacted versions of various documents relating to the NSA's domestic surveillance activities. The documents are being released on the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks." The EFF is hosting the documents, which are searchable. A few initial findings were posted yesterday evening; they include (thanks to another anonymous reader) the NSA illegally using phone data for three years, and evidence that Clapper knowingly mislead the public about metadata collection.

8 of 110 comments (clear)

  1. We have met the enemy .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And he is us.

    1. Re:We have met the enemy .... by bitt3n · · Score: 5, Funny

      We have met the enemy, and he is [REDACTED].

      --
      how many pairs of boxer shorts should you own?
  2. So, when will heads roll? by TrumpetPower! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The news is full of all sorts of illegal shit that the NSA and its lackeys have been doing for years, yet I haven't heard a peep about any hints of prosecution.

    Where're the prosecutors with the balls to hold the watchers accountable?

    b&

    --
    All but God can prove this sentence true.
    1. Re:So, when will heads roll? by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Where're the prosecutors with the balls to hold the watchers accountable?

      That of course assumes that the DoJ would have any interest in pursuing this, and that the politicians who should have damned well known this was happening want to do anything but sweep this under the rug.

      It's hard not to believe this was done without anybody in authority knowing it was happening -- at which point the only people who could prosecute for this are part of the problem.

      Is this 'rogue agency stepping outside of its mandate', or just part of a bigger problem where government has decided the laws don't really matter?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:So, when will heads roll? by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Except that there're virtually always young Turks or gadflies or other types looking to make a name for themselves or upset the applecart when those in power show signs of weakness.

      Sure there are, but since you'd be trying to prosecute the head of a federal agency (or near to it), you'd likely need the help of the Attorney General of the US.

      And if he's decided (or been told) that it's not in the national interest to do this, it simply won't happen.

      A junior prosecutor can't file charges his boss tells him he's not allowed to charge. He'd basically get fired or removed from the case.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm not disagreeing with you that someone should be charged -- I'm just of the opinion that as a practical matter it might be impossible for someone with the right jurisdiction to do anything about this to either have or exercise the will to prosecute.

      And I vaguely recall that the feds retain the right to basically say "you have no standing to sue because we said so". I have no idea of what entity could undertake this and be in any way free of being shut down by the feds who cite national security.

      The deck is unfortunately stacked against anybody who wants to prosecute this, since it could mean taking on the entire federal government.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  3. Oh look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    NSA shares raw intelligence including Americans' data with Israel
    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/11/nsa-americans-personal-data-israel-documents

  4. Re:Will we expect charges? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do you expect the head of a spy service NOT to lie? This is at the top of the whole chain of problems with 'intelligence'.

    The basic safety valve in the US approach to government isn't 'democracy' (which we aren't) or some sort of special affinity by a magical deity. It is the concept and application of checks and balances. Nobody can ultimately be trusted. No institution can be trusted for any period of time. You MUST have the ability to check the scope and application of any government department's mission.

    An intelligence service beholden to no one with essentially unlimited funds is a scary monster indeed.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  5. Where's the hole in your head? by Uberbah · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Will a Google SWAT team show up at your house based on emails about hydroponics? No, but one from the DEA might.

    Facebook and Google want to sell ads. Whereas the government wants to prosecute people with illegally gathered evidence, as when the NSA feeds data to the DEA. Pretty fucking serious difference.