Slashdot Mirror


Exxon Charged With Illegally Dumping Waste In Pennsylvania

Exxon has been charged with illegally dumping over 50,000 gallons of wastewater at a shale-gas drilling site in Pennsylvania. From the article: 'Exxon unit XTO Energy Inc. discharged the water from waste tanks at the Marquandt well site in Lycoming County in 2010, according to a statement on the website of Pennsylvania’s attorney general. The pollution was found during an unannounced visit by the state’s Department of Environmental Protection. The inspectors discovered a plug removed from a tank, allowing the wastewater to run onto the ground, polluting a nearby stream. XTO was ordered to remove 3,000 tons of soil to clean up the area. Wastewater discharged from natural-gas wells can contain chlorides, barium, strontium and aluminum, the attorney general’s statement showed. “Criminal charges are unwarranted and legally baseless,” the XTO unit said yesterday in a statement posted on its website. “There was no intentional, reckless or negligent misconduct by XTO.”'

17 of 246 comments (clear)

  1. Can we have someone go to jail now, please? by eksith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm getting sick of these companies getting away with fines or other slaps on the wrist. I want to see at least some of these thugs in the upper tiers behind bars!

    --
    If computers were people, I'd be a misanthrope.
    1. Re:Can we have someone go to jail now, please? by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm getting sick of these companies getting away with fines or other slaps on the wrist. I want to see at least some of these thugs in the upper tiers behind bars!

      Mayhap a trail of emails or (shudder) NSA monitored phones can catch them.

      Wastewater discharged from natural-gas wells can contain chlorides, barium, strontium and aluminum,

      Sounds like the average energy drink...

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Can we have someone go to jail now, please? by nicobigsby · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem is the goddamn double standard. Spray a few ounces of spray paint on a wall, and you get criminal charges pressed against you. Hell there was a guy arrested for writing in chalk outside Bank of America, on the sidewalks... wash away chalk. But dump 50k gallons of polluted water into the wild and it's all NBD.

    3. Re:Can we have someone go to jail now, please? by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But they didn't deliberately deface anything - they left a plug out of a tank, which leaked contaminated water at a rate which may not have seemed significant. They seem to have made good on the cleanup. Intent matters - that's why we have murder and manslaughter.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re:Can we have someone go to jail now, please? by ireallyhateslashdot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And also why we have such a thing as "negligence". They apparently were negligent; either in their maintenance protocols, equipment checks, or, well, making sure that contaminated waste is securely and safely managed. I would say that that warrants a criminal charge, but that's just my opinion.

    5. Re:Can we have someone go to jail now, please? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wonder who came up with that specific 'fact', that oil is a contaminant right at 'one part per million'. It certainly makes the "one gallon of oil can make one million gallons of water undrinkable" line sound horrible, but what is the basis in fact?

      Is 0.8 ppm safe, but 1.0 deadly? What about 0.6 ppm? Is water contaminated when one gallon of oil spills into a 2-million gallon tank? For that matter, oil floats on top of water, so how does the lower 99% get contaminated? If somehow a gallon of oil was mixed into water in such a way that every molecule of oil was separate, and each molecule floated 7 inches from any other one, how many gallons would be contaminated by that oil?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    6. Re:Can we have someone go to jail now, please? by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It means that 1.0 or below is considered safe to consume, it says nothing about what level makes you sick/dead just that anything above 1.0 is not considered safe.

      For that matter, oil floats on top of water, so how does the lower 99% get contaminated?

      Why do so many geeks have so much trouble comprehending simple guidelines? The water at the bottom is below 1.0ppm and therefore safe to consume, matter of fact many Aussies put some oil in their water tank to prevent mosquito wrigglers (the little fuckers can't come up to breath when there's a layer of oil on top). Note that not all oils float nice and neatly on the top of the water, heavy crude oil has a tendency to form tarballs and sink to the bottom, given a large enough body of still water, light oil will spread out to an unbroken film exactly one molecule thick.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  2. Yes, it happens by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And it will continue to happen, no matter the technology.
    Nuke, frak, solar panel production, high capacity battery production....some idiot middle manager will try to reduce costs at his level, and this is what we get.

    1. Re:Yes, it happens by eksith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then it's time to ruin the lives of those idiot managers. Say to the tune of 5-10 years of wearing an orange jumpsuit in lieu of an Armani jacket?

      --
      If computers were people, I'd be a misanthrope.
  3. No by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Funny

    they're your ruling class, silly. We don't spill the blood of kings.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:No by Microlith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      a serious impact on the political landscape.

      Yes, but not a good one. Eric Cantor and Mitch McConell have yet to do anything useful or intelligent.

    2. Re:No by jamstar7 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      a serious impact on the political landscape.

      Yes, but not a good one. Eric Cantor and Mitch McConell have yet to do anything useful or intelligent.

      They're not supposed to. They're meat puppets. They got the corporate hand shoved so far up their asses, they're chewing the Koch brothers' fingernails.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    3. Re:No by ixuzus · · Score: 5, Informative

      Of course not. Back then kids learned about guns and respected them... or rather acted like stupid juveniles with access to firearms

  4. Re:Now what? by jamesh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My friend had a 50,000 gallon above-ground pool in his backyard. If it's even a problem due to exotic chemicals, make them clean it up. It's not that much.

    Why the hell is this a topic aside from obvious desire by some for disasterbation? It would barely be a local news story in some small town.

    So the company has the decision to make...

    (a) $x to dispose of the waste properly

    (b) $0 to simply turn on a tap and let the waste drain away, and (say) $10x to clean it up in the unlikely event that they get caught, which probably comes out of some other departments budget anyway

    Seems that if there is no actual penalty for (b), then (b) is the obvious choice and it's going to keep happening, which I think is kind of a big deal. It should either be illegal with penalties to suit, or legal and let them do it without any fuss.

    If you threw some rubbish on the ground and were caught, and the only penalty was that you had to pick your rubbish up again, where is the incentive to stop doing it again? (assuming you are too lazy to do the right thing in the first place without some incentive)

  5. Re:What does that mean? by chromaexcursion · · Score: 4, Informative

    A corporation's board of directors are legally responsible for the company's actions.
    Failure to appear when subpoenas are issued will have serious consequences for the billionaires.
    You can't just send a lawyer to represent you in a criminal court.
    Forcing the people that run the company to show up in court will send a message.

  6. Re:They dumped the waste water yet no misconduct by cirby · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's according to how much actual toxic waste was in the water.

    While the article (and the excerpt above) mention a list of scary chemicals that "can" be found in wastewater from natural gas drilling, it's also quite possible that the major component was... mud. And a small percentage of oil (usually three percent or less, and even lower for a natural gas well, all the way down to "practically zero") - and other not-very-toxic stuff. Or "toxic chemicals" found in parts per million or lower. If they were using fracking chemicals, the mud might have had some bleach and surfactants in it.

    Now, if the rock they were drilling through had a high metal content, the water may have picked up some of that - but probably not too much, overall. Enough to break water standards, but not enough to be actually dangerous.

    Since there's no charges, it was probably low-concentration stuff - a technical violation, but not serious.

  7. Re:They dumped the waste water yet no misconduct by fl!ptop · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Explain that one to me again?

    Because shit happens. I've worked at several big chemical plants and all of them have had spills. (To me, this sounds like a "spill" and not "dumping waste.") It's just the nature of the beast, nothing works perfectly all the time. At one plant in particular, vandals/kids/idiots with too much time on their hands got onto the property (not hard to do when the facility covers thousands of acres) and removed a cover off a pipe, causing thousands of gallons of water with a ph of about 1 to flow into a nearby stream, which eventually made its way into the bay and caused a large fish kill. Yes, the company was fined. Yes, corrective action was taken to avoid it from happening again.

    From what I read, Exxon cleaned up the contaminated area as best they could. I seriously doubt the spill was done on purpose. I live in the middle of frack-land and these oil companies are spending millions buying/leasing mineral rights, hauling equipment in and out, drilling, fracking, trucking out wastewater and hauling equipment away. Millions of dollars are spent at each drill site. They're not going to risk "dumping" wastewater to save a few bucks on having it hauled away.

    --
    When you recognize love in another and realize how precious it is, everything else seems so insignificant.