Slashdot Mirror
Dialing Back the Alarm On Climate Change
An anonymous reader writes "A leaked copy of a report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has made the rounds and the good news is that the predicted temperature rise expected as a result of man-made emissions of carbon dioxide is lower than predicted in 2007. From the article: 'Admittedly, the change is small, and because of changing definitions, it is not easy to compare the two reports, but retreat it is. It is significant because it points to the very real possibility that, over the next several generations, the overall effect of climate change will be positive for humankind and the planet. Specifically, the draft report says that "equilibrium climate sensitivity" (ECS)—eventual warming induced by a doubling of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, which takes hundreds of years to occur—is "extremely likely" to be above 1 degree Celsius (1.8 degrees Fahrenheit), "likely" to be above 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.4 degrees Fahrenheit) and "very likely" to be below 6 degrees Celsius (10.8 Fahrenheit). In 2007, the IPPC said it was "likely" to be above 2 degrees Celsius and "very likely" to be above 1.5 degrees, with no upper limit. Since "extremely" and "very" have specific and different statistical meanings here, comparison is difficult.'"
Citations?
And which of these was on either a per reviewed paper or IPCC report and which were in some other media?
The "hockey stick" graph has been found to be fairly accurate... See summary on Wikipedia, for example:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockey_stick_controversy
The basic declarations of the IPCC have been consistent for years, namely increased severity of storms with more water content in the atmosphere, and more variation in global weather patterns.
Stupid dickhead, are you completely unaware of any other research that's been done in the SEVEN YEARS since that film came out? Jump off a cliff and kill yourself already, all you are doing is picking the same hole in the same film by a guy who isn't even a scientist and trying to drag the debate back to a time when you thought you could argue your way out of it. That's your MO isn't it, make enough noise about some insignificant detail and hope it distracts from the advancement of the real issue.
What do you have to say about Chasing Ice, huh, tough guy?