Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Plasmonic Nanostructures Could Prove a Boon To Solar Cell Technology

Posted by samzenpus on from the brighter-and-brighter dept.

Zothecula writes "Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania have found a way to harvest energy from sunlight more efficiently, with the help of so-called plasmonic nanostructures. The new findings suggest that plasmonic components can enhance and direct optical scattering, creating a mechanism that is more efficient than the photoexcitation that drives solar cells. The development could therefore provide a real boost to solar cell efficiency and lead to faster optical communication."

5 of 107 comments (clear)

  1. I will believe it when I can buy it by Amadodd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I had a dollar for every time a uni came up with a new solar cell. The reality is that most of what you can buy is stil monocrystalline silicone, same as 50 years ago. Why is nothing commercialised?

    --
    Freedom of speech doesn't come with bandwidth.
  2. Re:This has got to be the 37th amazing improvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    He's too concerned with NOW than to look at the big picture an realize how far we have come.

  3. Re:Solar cells are already cheap enough by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can think of a few reasons:
    1) This doesn't scale. If we want solar to catch on a massive scale, we need a way to either store it, or a way for a night/cloudy/rainy power source to fill in the gaps
    2) A lot of places where solar would be really useful doesn't have grid access to begin with. Many third world areas (IE: large portions of Africa) come to mind, but there's plenty of other places - the US has large swaths of nothingness that could benefit from solar power but don't have grid connections.
    3) Portable applications, in which in would be impractical to run a temporary grid connection to it, would do great with some energy storage.

  4. Re:Solar cells are already cheap enough by SJHillman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1. The idea is to reduce non-renewable sources in favor of renewable sources. The biggest issue facing this in the long run is the need to store the energy as most non-renewable sources are not continuously reliable (wind) or are cyclic (solar, some hydro). Saying you can load balance with a non-renewable resource is a short term solution.

    2. Solar is getting pretty cheap, and a lot of places are using it to some degree already. It's not unheard of for poor African villages to use solar to recharge car batteries each day. It's the storage that's the weak link in cases like these moreso than the solar generation.

    3. Generators get expensive fast once you consider the indirect costs such as transportation. Also, see 1. Most solutions not involving some kind of energy storage are short term solutions (within the lifetime of people already born).

  5. Re:This has got to be the 37th amazing improvement by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful
    For how many decades did it seem like hard drives and CRT displays would never be displaced? They just kept steadily improving the whole time, and no fundamentally different technologies could overtake them - until they did. (Hard drives decreased $/byte by increasing the denominator, whereas PV cells decreased $/watt by decreasing the numerator, does that somehow not count?)

    Sure, the vast majority of research comes to nothing. The exceptions are what make it possible for 7 billion people to exist on earth.