Slashdot Mirror


Sailfish OS Gains Two-Way Android Compatibility

DeviceGuru writes "Jolla announced (PDF) that its Sailfish OS is now fully compatible with Android, letting the Linux-based mobile OS run Android apps, as well as operate on hardware configured for Android. This makes the MeeGo-based Sailfish OS the first alternative mobile Linux OS to achieve the feat. Jolla also announced that a second batch of pre-orders for its Sailfish-based Jolla phones will open later this week, after having sold out its first batch in August."

8 of 130 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Shame by Teun · · Score: 5, Insightful
    And what is on a world scale relevant about a single market?

    Besides, what stops you from doing like the Rest Of the World and buying your own phone?
    Between the first Motorola I bought nearly 20 years ago and my present Nexus 4 I've never had one with a contract.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  2. Re:no thanks by Teun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't care one cent about the Android compatibility, I want an Open Linux phone, a device that'll run things like Thunderbird. or Kmail and doesn't make me an entry in Google's or MS database for exploitation.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  3. Re:no thanks by EmperorArthur · · Score: 4, Informative

    Google Play Store is just another Android app. The only reason that some Android phones don't have it is because the manufacturers choose not to put it on them, but Play Store is able to run on any phone running Android. Is there any technical reason why you can't install Google Play Store on Sailfish OS?

    No, just legal ones. Though the play store has so many permissions you might as well grant Google, and by extension the NSA, root access when you install the thing.

    Copyright means Google can set whatever terms they want when it comes to companies installing or people using the play store.

    --
    So lets pretend that we've just completed writing this code, as opposed to having just completed sabotaging it -Altera
  4. For Nokia it is a tiny market by dbIII · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, Elop is what killed nearly Nokia but it's not quite dead yet. Just last quarter they sold 53 million phones in China using the Sybian system that Elop tried to bury and halted all development on. Even hamstrung they sold more phones in a single market than Apple did in the entire world (new Apple record of 31 million phones in one quarter).
    Now do you get some idea of why people are taking the Nokia takeover so seriously? A company that has been utterly gutted in a blatant corporate raid is still selling more phones than Apple despite people being told by the CEO of the company selling them that the platform is doomed.

    1. Re:For Nokia it is a tiny market by Eunuchswear · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, Elop is what killed nearly Nokia but it's not quite dead yet. Just last quarter they sold 53 million phones in China using the Sybian system.

      Uh, not Sybian

      You mean Symbian.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  5. Re:Shame by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Besides, what stops you from doing like the Rest Of the World and buying your own phone?

    I've noticed that US folks tend to think that you can only get a phone from a carrier . . . and just assume that the whole world also works like it does in the US.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  6. Re:Shame by cbope · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the US, almost NOBODY buys mobile phones off-contract. Yes, most of us know that is the worst way to buy a mobile phone, but the simple fact is most Americans don't want to pay up-front for the phone. The average US consumer will not do the math and figure out how much more they are paying on-contract, not to mention that US mobile call and data rates are among the highest in the world. I've been trying to convince my parents in the US, who are in their 70's and retired, to get phones off-contract, but they just don't get it. All they see is the bigger up-front cost. It's a cultural thing, Americans tend to want their stuff now and with no starting cost, even if it costs them more over time. I see this both in the consumer and business worlds.

    Carrier lock-in via contracts and locked devices is still a big issue in the US, unlike many other parts of the world.

    Disclaimer: I'm an ex-pat American living abroad for 12 years.

  7. Re: Shame by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 4, Informative

    Let's see. Buy a $600 phone subsidized down to $100, and pay the carrier for the cheapest plan at about $80/month ($50/mo + federal fees & taxes) for two years. $2020 total cost.

    Now we buy that same phone on Ebay for a steal at $400, and put it on the same carrier, same plan which costs the same because they charge for the subsidy anyway and since the subsidy is not a line item, there's no way for them to reduce the bill (still $80/month) over the same time period of 2 years: $2320 total cost.

    Wow... I saved -$300 by buying the phone outright!...wait.