Slashdot Mirror


Fracked Shale Could Sequester Carbon Dioxide

MTorrice writes "The same wells that energy companies drill to extract natural gas from shale formations could become repositories to store large quantities of carbon dioxide. A new computer model suggests that wells in the Marcellus shale, a 600-sq-mile formation in the northeastern U.S. that is a hotbed for gas extraction, could store half the CO2 emitted by the country's power plants from now until 2030."

4 of 235 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds like a great plan. by Wycliffe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's store the next 30 years worth of excess carbon dioxide in huge underground chambers
    so that instead of gradual climate change that the environment can adjust to and compensate
    for we instead have a massive catastrophic climate change when one of those chambers
    springs a leak.

  2. Right by TheSpoom · · Score: 5, Insightful
    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  3. Re:interesting by crunchygranola · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because pollution is something that never ever existed anywhere and was entirely made up by Liberals, rather than being produced by corporations?

    If you bother to read TFA you will see what a petrochemical industry researcher says about this computer model: "the model does not consider several important factors, including the buoyancy of the gases, the heterogeneity of these kinds of formations, and the presence of water and other fluids, all of which will affect how much CO2 will be absorbed by fractured shale".

    But you are confident that one grossly simplified computer model, without any field data to test it, is the answer?

    Tell me, AC. Are you similarly convinced of the accuracy of the very thoroughly researched and comprehensively supported global climate models? Do you denounce those who doubt these models with the same profanity?

    --
    Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
  4. Could and Can, pfff. whatever. by VortexCortex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "could store half the CO2 emitted by the country's power plants from now until 2030." -- Yes, well, but that can't actually be done... Additionally, 2030 isn't very far away. If I'm going to sell my future humans down the river I would prefer them not to be alive right now -- Or more importantly: I would like to be dead long before they realize we rigged their short lot on the temporal lottery.

    Here, let me demonstrate how bullshit the claim is:
    Sunlight at Earth's surface could provide ALL of the energy needed by mankind for the foreseeable future.

    See? It 'could'. However, CAN we overcome the greed barrier and actually do so? Not fucking likely. Could, Should and Would, CAN go fuck themselves. Let me know when these mother frackers commit a 'Will'......