Slashdot Mirror


Russian Government Takes Over Country's 289-year Old Scientific Academy

ananyo writes "Russia's lower house of parliament, the State Duma, approved controversial reforms to the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) on 18 September. More than 330 members of the Duma voted in favor of the law, with only 107 against, in a move critics say will deprive the 289-year-old body of its independence and halt attempts to revitalize Russia's struggling science system. If, as is widely expected, the parliament's upper house and Russian President Vladimir Putin approve the law, the 436 institutes and 45,000 research staff of Russia's primary basic-research organization will be managed by a newly established federal agency that reports directly to Putin. The agency will manage the academy's 60-billion-rouble (US$1.9-billion) budget and extensive property portfolio, which includes lucrative sites in Moscow and St Petersburg, and will also have a say in the appointment of institute directors. 'This is not a reform — this is a liquidation of science in Russia,' says Alexander Kuleshov, director of the academy's Institute for Information Transmission Problems in Moscow."

192 comments

  1. Neat! by dex22 · · Score: 4, Funny

    My big take-home from this article is they have an "Institute for Information Transmission Problems" - a whole Institute just devoted to resolving poor communication.

    They really got their message out!

    1. Re:Neat! by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      Like the one in Washington? The one about the "political science" b*****t?

    2. Re:Neat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Institute for...
      Information Transmission Problems in Moscow.

    3. Re:Neat! by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Institute for...
      Information Transmission Problems in Moscow.

      Avast, Putin be planning some rebadgin - Information We Have No Problems - Is Only You Institute. Arr. oX)P-|

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:Neat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My take-home is that there may be excellent Russian scientists working on all sorts of interesting projects who could be willing to work for the US instead - provided they can slip out of the country.

    5. Re:Neat! by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      My take-home is that there may be excellent Russian scientists working on all sorts of interesting projects who could be willing to work for the US instead - provided they can slip out of the country.

      The harder they make it for people to go about their life and jobs the easier it be makin' it for them t' jump ship. Arrr! ox)P-)

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    6. Re:Neat! by interval1066 · · Score: 2

      My take-home on this is that perhaps people are starting to question the Russian institutionalized fascination paranormal psuedo-science.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    7. Re:Neat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is the first time I will really support visa jobs program in U.S. Intellectal Scapgoat will lead to braindrain in Russia! Cold War 2.0 is on! Why funding Science in USA will defeat spooks/KGB.

    8. Re:Neat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This institute, btw, employs/employed three Fields medalists (Okounkov, Margulis and Kontsevich).

    9. Re:Neat! by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Wrong academy.
      The science freak academy is the "Russian Academy of Natural Sciences".

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    10. Re:Neat! by alberto_moro · · Score: 2

      It's probably their kind of Bell Labs/NSA University program. So what was your criticism again ? That Russia has a serious sword which they can stick in you nice, pink ass ?

      "

      The Institute for Information Transmission Problems established in 1961 (in November 2004 the Institute was named after A. Kharkevich) is part of the nanotechnology and information technology department of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

      The main purpose of the Institute is to perform basic research and applied developments regarding problems in information transmission, distribution, processing and management in engineering and living systems.

      The main scientific activities of the Institute are following:

              the theory of information transmission and protection;
              the mathematical theory of information and management, multi-component random systems;
              information and communication technologies and their application in complex systems and networks;
              information processes in living systems, and bioinformatics;
              computational linguistics.

      The Institute has united scientists from different fields and is able to conduct basic and applied research almost in all areas related to the information transmission problems in technical, social and living systems. Particularly it allows the Institute to conduct multidisciplinary researches, combining the expertise of mathematicians, biologists and linguists.
      The Institute has formed a strong team of highly qualified scientists: mathematicians, physicists, biologists, engineers and linguists - who collaboratively perform basic researches on a wide range of scientific problems.

      Though currently the Institute numbers 242 researchers, the results of its scientific activity are very important and highly regarded in our country and abroad.
      The Institute includes three academicians, one corresponding member of RAS, 75 PhDs and 117 candidates of sciences. Three members of the Institute were awarded the Fields medal, the highest prize in mathematics.

      1978 â" Grigory Alexandrovich Margulis;

      1998 â" Maxim Lvovich Kontsevich

      2006 â" Andrei Yurevich Okunkov

      For the first time this medal was awarded in 1936, and since then it was granted only to 47 scientists (including 7 scientists in our country).
      The Instituteâ(TM)s scientists are members of several foreign academies of the leading countries of the world, a lot of Instituteâ(TM)s experts received prestigious prizes and awards, granted by the RAS as well as foreign academies, universities and organizations.

      Scientists and fellows of the Institute carry out applied researches according to both plans of the RAS and under contracts concluded with various Ministeries and institutions of the RF and foreign companies.
      Practical developments of the Instituteâ(TM)s experts are awarded by more than 50 diplomas, medals and prizes of the largest national and international exhibitions held in Moscow, St. Petersburg, Geneva, Brussels and other cities.

      Developments of the Institute are currently commercially produced by national enterprises.
      In 2006 the General meeting of researchers formed five professional associations (according to the main directions of scientific activities) in order to bring together on a voluntary basis professionals to facilitate the Academic Council of the Institute in creating the research agenda, conducting expert examinations of research papers and solving current issues.

      The Institute is co-founder of three scientific journals â" âoeProblems of Information Transmissionâ, âoeAutomation and Remote Controlâ and the electronic journal âoeInformation processesâ.

      The first two journals are fully translated in English and distributed worldwide by publishing house âoeSpringerâ. The best articles from the electronic journal are also translated in English and published in the journal ÂAutomation and Remote ControlÂ.

      The Institute has a post-graduate and doctoral studies. There is also a special council to grant the degrees of doctor and candidate of sciences.
      "

  2. And Putin continues by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    in his quest to turn Russia into a theocracy.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:And Putin continues by Nutria · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Edward Snowden must feel so proud of his newly adopted homeland.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    2. Re:And Putin continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      I think Putin is just going to push us into another cold war. He will likely die of heart failure before WW3 breaks out. I don't think anyone wants to put troops on the ground, but having an arms race will spur spending without the negative death aspects. I'm not saying that our USA's efforts aren't pushing for this either. We are giving foreign nations plenty of excuses to grasp for less open infrastructure and mitigate negative public opinion.

    3. Re:And Putin continues by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      With himself as god, most likely.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:And Putin continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Since he was only granted temporary asylum, and is currently awaiting decisions on permanent asylum in 19 other countries. it is not clear how you get "his newly adopted homeland."

    5. Re:And Putin continues by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      With himself as god, most likely.

      Avast! That scalawag Putin will most likely immanentize the eschaton or claim he has. Arr. ox)P-|

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    6. Re:And Putin continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an American, I assume, you must be proud that a whistle-blower has been forced to seek asylum in that goddamn place from the thuggish US government....

    7. Re:And Putin continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely he is ashamed that this new homeland is still preferable to the old.

    8. Re:And Putin continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm sure several members of the US Senate and House of Representatives (generally the ones with "(R)" after their names on TV) are looking at this with some jealousy and can't wait to institute some measures of "necessary reform for the elitist scientific and research establishment in the US".

      If they can't shame researchers and scientists with their usual demagoguery ("Proxmire Golden Fleece" awards), proclamations on the floor/CSPAN that make headlines "we wasted $100,000 on honey bee sex research!" (while blowing $billions/month on stupid military actions), etc., then this will do it.

      or just look north for how the Canadian government is also going about it.

      Hey, I know, let's hire the Wisconsin governor as head of the NSF/NIH/DOE all at once!

    9. Re:And Putin continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this new homeland is still preferable to the old

      Only as seen through the lense of knee-jerk anti-Americanism.

      If you seriously think Putin's Russia is any better than the USA on these issues, you haven't been paying attention.

    10. Re:And Putin continues by Valdrax · · Score: 2

      Edward Snowden must feel so proud of his newly adopted homeland.

      Name a country from which he could reveal secrets about how the US government has been spying on its citizens and not get extradited and sent to jail which isn't on our "bad guys" list.

      Yes, Snowden chose countries like China and Russia to make his stand from, but it's not like he had any other choices that would keep him from ending up like all the other whistleblowers this administration has gone after hard.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    11. Re:And Putin continues by sparkeyjames · · Score: 1

      No it's an attempt by Putin to consolidate his power. All hail the new Russian dictator.
       

    12. Re:And Putin continues by sparkeyjames · · Score: 0

      Well aren't you just cute. Your parents must be so proud to have brought up such a hateful little snowflake such as yourself.

    13. Re:And Putin continues by Nutria · · Score: 0

      Yes, Snowden chose countries like China and Russia to make his stand from

      The same China that forced a blogger to praise internet censorship?
      http://yro.slashdot.org/story/13/09/17/2158257/arrested-chinese-blogger-confesses-on-state-tv-praises-censorship

      The same China and Russia that have nothing even remotely similar to the ACLU or the EFF?

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    14. Re:And Putin continues by peragrin · · Score: 1

      nope not a theocracy.

      ALL HAIL TSAR PUTIN. Heir to the Romanav's.

      He even has secret palaces being built.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    15. Re:And Putin continues by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Edward Snowden must feel so proud of his newly adopted homeland.

      As if hiding from a blood-thirsty mob in a ditch constitutes an endorsement of ditch-living.

      Snowden's first goal was to expose the NSA. His second is to remain alive and unimprisoned, and sadly his only options for that appear to be oppressive states. That's not an indictment of Snowden, it is an indictment of the so-called "free world."

    16. Re:And Putin continues by xevioso · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What basis do you have to believe that if he is granted asylum in one of those countries, Russia will allow him to leave?

    17. Re:And Putin continues by Nutria · · Score: 1, Troll

      Snowden's first goal was to expose the NSA.

      The NSA's job is to spy. So they spy. The country's borders are so open; they make a colander seem waterproof. Unfortunately for all and sundry, those who would do harm to the country don't walk around with flashing red lights on their heads. Thus, since it's hard to separate the wheat from the chaff, they collect lots and lots of stuff, even on people living in the US. I AM UNAPOLOGETICALLY GLAD THEY DO SO, since they do not appear to share it with the FBI nor state+local police.

      (The problem is that they then have the ability, like local & state police and the FBI, to track wives, ex-girlfriends, etc, etc. That's bad, but can be solved by more Internal Affairs oversight, not by throwing the baby out with the bathwater.)

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    18. Re:And Putin continues by cavreader · · Score: 1, Troll

      His stated goal was to inform the US public about the governments data collection efforts and how they effected US citizens. The US constitution protects US citizens not foreign nationals. However, now he believes that he and a certain journalist are competent enough to determine whether any of the information collected on FOREIGN programs can harm the US if released. Who is he to make that decision? What is his definition of harm? His pet journalist hates the US with a vengeance and has no problem releasing anything, especially if it harms the US. He once had chance to negotiate with the US authorities and return to the US but he burned that bridge and has sealed his fate as an international fugitive for the remainder of his life. Every country in the world spies on both their enemies and allies and the US really doesn't have any allies so every one is fair game. If he was a Russian or Chinese he would have already been either imprisoned or killed. If he evaded them they would use his friends and families as hostages until he returned. Both countries have well documented instances of them using this tactic.

    19. Re:And Putin continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since Snowden fled to what you describe as oppressive states, by your own logic then the "free world" is indeed the free world, and the indictment is of Snowden. Snowden's' goals in practice are no different than those of Kim Philby. We will always be able to count on the Left and those who hate the West in general, and the US and UK in particular to hold Snowden as a hero. The Soviet Union failed and crumbled, but little has really changed.

    20. Re:And Putin continues by Pav · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sooo... because you don't trust your fellow man... you... put your trust in a group of your fellow men self-selected for a career in the spy game? *golf clap* Well played sir. THINK man... spying is separated into different agencies (foreign/domestic) etc... for a reason, and there's a reason those (now subverted) oversight courts exist.

      There's only one thing that makes people put on an approximation of trustworthiness - accountability. Noone is arguing borders should be guarded, but the watchers should be watched. If the guard dog not only slipped its collar but broke the rules badly it should be punished.

    21. Re:And Putin continues by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Wow, I can't believe you got modded up for that. It is just a big ball of hate, all invective, no reasoning at all.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    22. Re:And Putin continues by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      We'll see, if that eventuality occurs. As it stands now, Snowden doesn't see Russia as his new 'homeland.'

      Why would Russia not allow him to leave anyway? Heck, they let Lee Harvey Oswald come and go in the middle of the Cold War. And he actually believed that he wanted to live in the USSR.

    23. Re:And Putin continues by Nutria · · Score: 0

      but the watchers should be watched.

      Apparently you didn't read both paragraphs in the post you replied to. Specifically the part where I wrote but can be solved by more Internal Affairs oversight.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    24. Re:And Putin continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Allow me to correct your false statement. There are both facts and reason there, you just disagree with the line of thinking. Your post is best understood self-referentially.

    25. Re:And Putin continues by TemperedAlchemist · · Score: 1

      You'd think Russia would have learned by now.

      Apparently not.

    26. Re:And Putin continues by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Allow me to correct your false statement. There are both facts and reason there,

      Allow me to clarify - no relevant facts and lots of poor reasoning all wrapped up in a big ball of tribal anger.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    27. Re:And Putin continues by Pav · · Score: 1

      The problem is significantly bigger than spying on wives, ex-girlfriends etc... look at Russia for a state subverted by its security apparatus, and that is FAR from the first time something like that has happened. Terrorists can in no way endanger a state... they're just a handful of nutjobs unless their host populations are brutalised enough for them to get broader support. .... ooops. OK, OK... but even if you opened your boarders to jihadist suicide bombers on purpose they in no way would endanger freedom in a western nation state (although life and limb not so much). My families history however helps me understand that a modern democracy with liberal values can be subverted from within, and there is value in freedom, even vs safety.

    28. Re:And Putin continues by Nutria · · Score: 0

      My families history however helps me understand that a modern democracy with liberal values can be subverted from within

      That's why I don't want the FBI to see what the NSA has, and am upset with the militarization of police forces.

      Slightly changing subject, but not actually: Were you in the US on 9/11? Do you remember how the passengers of three planes sat like sheep driven to the slaughter, because that's how the authorities had drilled into people how to act in terrorist situations? Don't fight back. Just do what the terrorists say, and the government make everything ok.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    29. Re: And Putin continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In Post-Soviet Russia, authoritarianism isn't back. It was never permitted to leave...

    30. Re:And Putin continues by Pav · · Score: 1

      Doing nothing is the right answer in some situations and the wrong answer in others... it depends on the tactics and goals of the aggressor, and unfortunately we don't get to know ahead of time. One day a load of passengers will probably be needlessly mowed down when a hijacker "only" wants to trade concessions for lives and there's a "we're all gonna die" stampede.

    31. Re:And Putin continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And after that hijackers won't try it again. If getting stamped down by the mob is 100% guaranteed there won't be any hijackers.

    32. Re:And Putin continues by Pav · · Score: 2

      Also, regarding FBI seeing what the NSA has... we already know the DEA does (look up "parallel construction"). Hopefully the natural internicine turf wars have kept the separation, but we haven't heard the FBI screaming very much about this invasion of their turf - that's a scarey sign.

    33. Re:And Putin continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as a troll, you're simply dreadful. you suck, big time. get yourself a mind, and try again.

    34. Re:And Putin continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NSA's job is to spy. So they spy.

      Their job is to make willing serfs of you, and they appear to be succeeding. ;)

    35. Re:And Putin continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the US really doesn't have any allies so every one is fair game.

      A return to isolationism would be most welcome. Speaking on behalf of many of the rest of the world, please, fuck off.

    36. Re:And Putin continues by Pav · · Score: 1

      Other than the 70's aircraft hijackings have been so rare they practically never happen anyway, and the hijackings that have happened since 9/11 (granted, only a handful worldwide, which is usual) non-violence has largely been the strategy for survival.

    37. Re:And Putin continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snowden's first goal was to expose the NSA.

      The NSA's job is to spy. So they spy. The country's borders are so open; they make a colander seem waterproof. Unfortunately for all and sundry, those who would do harm to the country don't walk around with flashing red lights on their heads. Thus, since it's hard to separate the wheat from the chaff, they collect lots and lots of stuff, even on people living in the US. I AM UNAPOLOGETICALLY GLAD THEY DO SO, since they do not appear to share it with the FBI nor state+local police.

      (The problem is that they then have the ability, like local & state police and the FBI, to track wives, ex-girlfriends, etc, etc. That's bad, but can be solved by more Internal Affairs oversight, not by throwing the baby out with the bathwater.)

      You lucky lucky bastard! I bet they spit in your face too... ohhh they were the days, I'd give anything to be spat at in the face.

    38. Re:And Putin continues by Nutria · · Score: 1

      but we haven't heard the FBI screaming very much about this invasion of their turf - that's a scarey sign.

      That's an excellent point. :(

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    39. Re:And Putin continues by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Did you somehow mistake me for praising China and Russia? They're terrible places from the perspective of freedom.

      But the bigger issue is that none of the countries that supposedly love freedom will stand up for him. The choice for Snowden is (a) keep silent about abuses of our rights, (b) throw himself on a grenade by staying within arms reach of the US government, or (c) make his stand from a country which is even worse but which won't lock him up for it.

      The least terrible choice from both the perspective of getting the word out and his own freedom was (c), but none of his choices were good. If you think there was an actual good choice for him, then speak up and stop trashing him for the one he did take. It's not like you put your skin on the line for freedom; you don't get to speak like you're talking from a higher moral position than him from the comfort of your chair.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    40. Re:And Putin continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They must think the sun shines out of his ass!

    41. Re:And Putin continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. How sickening.

    42. Re:And Putin continues by Nutria · · Score: 1

      The problem is that Snowden didn't just expose rights abuses. He exposed *everything* that the NSA did.

      (Unless you live in the fairy land where idealistic heroes defeat Evil Doers, in which case, what Snowden did was a good thing. Too bad we don't live in fairy land.)

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    43. Re:And Putin continues by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      The problem is that Snowden didn't just expose rights abuses. He exposed *everything* that the NSA did.

      Actually, no. Barton Gellman of The Washington Post has said that he made sure that he had people he could trust not to release everything recklessly before he made his leaks. Glen Greenwald of The Guardian has also asserted that Snowden wanted people with discretion to have his data.

      (Unless you live in the fairy land where idealistic heroes defeat Evil Doers, in which case, what Snowden did was a good thing. Too bad we don't live in fairy land.)

      It's a bit closer of a neighbor to reality than the imaginary kingdom in which an agency that repeatedly lies to Congress can be trusted with the totalitarian power to watch everything everyone does because they're all just so damned noble and patriotic.

      Frankly, I don't consider terrorists as big of a threat to me as I do an unchecked secret police bureau. It's not a matter of if but when these capabilities get turned against US citizens exercising their Constitutional rights to express political opinions that those in power don't like. All one has to do is remember COINTELPRO and Nixon.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    44. Re:And Putin continues by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Then you're confusing the NSA with the FBI.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    45. Re:And Putin continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHA. Putin is a godless communist and I don't think that has changed. He's just doing to the universities what Hitler did in Germany. Nuclear scientists there did not trust him, and stalled nuclear weapons development with every tactic they could think of. After all the Jews were driven from academia, David Hilbert was asked by a Nazi official, "Herr Hilbert, wie geht's mit der Mathematik in Göttingen?" He replied, "Die Mathematik in Göttingen, die gibt es nicht mehr." "Mr Hilbert, how's the mathematics at Goettingen doing?" - "Mathematics at Goettingen is no more."

    46. Re:And Putin continues by alberto_moro · · Score: 1

      The only party working towards a new cold war is the US arms industry. All their nice jobs are on the line if they cannot quickly generate a new "threat". No that their last "threat" 9/11 has been washed out of conscience.

      Russia just wants a little piece of decent, peaceful life. They have much bigger problems than a penis-length contest with the US. For starters, their industry continues to crumble. Their population ages quickly. Their teeth are looking bad.

    47. Re:And Putin continues by alberto_moro · · Score: 1

      Sure. I assume it is not about the "Soviet Union", but you actually refer to the old hate of Britain against Russia. Now that America has replaced the British empire, Russia-hate has been transferred to the US.

      Russia these days is merely a state struggling to reserve a modicum of sovereignty, now that almost everybody is America's bitch. Including France, Britain, Japan and probably 150 more states recognized by the U.N.

    48. Re:And Putin continues by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Oh wow. That's the best you have -- that it was a different branch of US police/military authority?

      Gee, I guess the presence of a different set of three letters makes all the difference. Never mind that the NSA and the FBI both have vastly different priorities, missions, and capabilities pre and post 9/11. It's a different agency! That means it can never happen again. I must bow to your wisdom.

      This debate is a joke. I'm done here.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    49. Re:And Putin continues by alberto_moro · · Score: 1

      At least Putin is a patriot. Obama is just a puppet in the pay of NY finance.

      Russia will have the last laugh when America's economy has been destroyed by NY (they work hard on that project) and after that, fascism has been established to clean up that mess.

    50. Re:And Putin continues by alberto_moro · · Score: 1

      You are a little nasty shitball, Sir. Maybe you go down into your Langley shooting practice center, load one bullet in a pistol and then shoot off your penis.

      Here's why: Your post is full of baseless lies and full of generic cold-war propaganda. Putin regularly visits churches and listens to American(!) rock music. The stuff about Jews is 100% your fabrication.

      But I assume there are more than enough dumb Americans to eat your shite message as if it were an Argentinian stake of 1A Quality.

    51. Re:And Putin continues by alberto_moro · · Score: 1

      If you read the story of Oswald, you start to doubt whether there actually has ever been a "conflict" between the US state and the Soviet state.

      It appears much more that the military intelligence services of said states are ONE AND THE SAME. All the weapons, armies, ships and "conflicts" might have been a cynical show for the masses and a make-work project for the Russian and American arms industries.

      Oswald was a trained radar operator with a TS clearance and had lots of military intelligence acquaintances. But he could simply move back and forth between the US and the SU. Have a Russian wife. Talking of U.S. and S.U. - can you spot the symmetry of the letters ?

      Anyway, read the facts about Oswald and then GET PUZZLED.

    52. Re:And Putin continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't give a fuck what you think and neither does anyone else. Go get lost and fuck yourself with a hot fire poker.

    53. Re:And Putin continues by jonfr · · Score: 1

      I see that russian part of slashdot has modpoints (I got mod down to troll for this fact). The fact is the fact.

      This is not a question of when, since it has already happened. Now they are banning and making enemy out of homosexual people (both men and women). This is just the first step. Next step is to create some big foreign enemy, so far Putin has not yet done that since he is not ready. His military is not yet ready for such actions. In the meantime he is going to continue to increase his power in Russia and in the end cancel out already weak democracy in Russia.

      He started on that the day he got into office and he is not going to stop until he gets what he wants. What Putin wants is a Stalin era power with him in control. We already know what Stalin did to the russian people and now Putin is going to do the same in due time if he is not stopped by powers inside Russia (if he has not already crushed them. As I think is most likely the case already).

      I do not know how long this is going to take for Putin to implement. But my best guess is less then 20 years from now, depending on factors and what he can do in Russia and what the global reaction is going to be when the time comes.

    54. Re:And Putin continues by airdweller · · Score: 1

      No, my bet is that you got modded down b/c you were being silly. The chances of the WW3 that would have Russia and the US on the opposite sides are minimal. Saying anything else just proves that you are clueless about both countries and the geopolitics in general. They might - and most likely will - oppose each other indirectly - through proxy wars, but those conflicts will be limited in their scale. Russia has much bigger problems than duking it out with the US. The same applies to the US. Moreover, they really have nothing to fight over right now.

  3. Rouble? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no Cyrillic 'o' in the Russian word; why would it come out "rouble" in the transliteration?

    1. Re:Rouble? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      It would look too similar to "rubble". Although...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Rouble? by mirix · · Score: 1

      Same as there is no U in Rossiya, or no 'Greece' in Ellada. English has it's own name for some things, instead of direct transliteration.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    3. Re:Rouble? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Just as "there is no I in TEAM" (and, as some hearty individualists have pointed out "there is also no WE or US in TEAM, either, and certainly no YOU, but a crafty Boggle player could find MEAT and TAME") proves there is a cute saying for any occasion.
      --
      Sent from my Intersil 4004

    4. Re:Rouble? by Nutria · · Score: 2

      there is also no WE or US in TEAM, either,

      But ME certainly is.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    5. Re:Rouble? by Darinbob · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not just English. It was common in Europe to have multiple names for various cities and regions, because they'd change ownership often, or the language would change locally but foreigners would keep the old names, etc. Ie, Frankreich, Allemagne.

      (oblig pirate: Arrr!)

    6. Re:Rouble? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Welcome to /., JarJar.

    7. Re:Rouble? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Historically, the Russian letter "y" - which is equivalent to Latin "u" - was actually spelled as a digraph "oy", up until Peter the Great's alphabet reform of 1708. And the reason why it was spelled that is because Cyrillic alphabet was designed based on Greek, and in Greek the same sound is rendered as "ou" (omicron-upsilon) - so that was mapped as a digraph in Cyrillic, even though East Slavic languages didn't have a sound corresponding to standalone u/y, so it was never a letter in its own right. At some point, they started to write the digraph vertically, with "y" on top in line with other letters on the line, and "o" below it overlapping the tail; and then eventually "o" got dropped, leaving just "y", which is the shape that was codified by Peter in the Civil Script, and remains to this day.

      So the Russian (and before that existed as a distinct language, Old East Slavic) word was indeed properly written as "roubl" up until 1708. And if it found its way into European languages at that time - which is very likely, since the word itself dates back to at least 13th century, and there was healthy trade between East Slavs and the rest of Europe - then this is the spelling from which the Latin transliteration was done.

    8. Re:Rouble? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The funniest part about this is the edit wars it occasionally leads to on Wikipedia. E.g., the Great Gdansk/Danzig Edit War.

    9. Re:Rouble? by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      That's very interesting, thanks. Only thing I'm curious about: are you saying that in Greek, the sound made by the omicron-upislon dipthong was only made by the dipthong? My understanding--recognizing the limitations of our knowledge about ancient pronounciations--is that "ou" and "u" make basically the same sound.

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    10. Re:Rouble? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It depends on which Greek you're talking about. Originally - in Archaic Greek - yes, upsilon was just IPA [u], and omicron-upsilon more or less faithfully represented the corresponding diphthong. In Classical Greek, upsilon shifted into [y], while omicron-upsilon became [u]. In Modern Greek, it is pronounced either as [i] or as [v], depending on position, and the name of the letter is, correspondingly, "ipsilon".

      [y] and [u] are fairly different sounds, though depending on your native language, one might sound like a version of the other to you.

    11. Re:Rouble? by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that. I'm curious, are you a linguist or...?

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    12. Re:Rouble? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      No, but Russian is my native language, and I like to explore some aspects on it, including the rather convoluted history of its writing system. Pretty much all of this is available on Wikipedia if you know where to look (or if you start reading at a high-level article like "Cyrillic script" and then chase down the various link chains to their logical ends).

  4. True Bummer for our friends in Russia by sasparillascott · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Our thoughts are with those folks, this just really sucks...cause it begs the question, how do you turn this around and there's no nice answer to that. Deeper into the dark Putin takes the country.

    1. Re:True Bummer for our friends in Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have to ask the obvious question: If everything was perfect till now, why there is no known famous Russian scientist?

      Just because you were taught that all important discoveries were made by citizens of your country doesn't make it true. Go google "famous Russian scientists". On the Wikipedia page you'll find, grep "Nobel prize" and count the number of entries it returns. Then, come back here and apologize for asking an incredibly uninformed question.

    2. Re:True Bummer for our friends in Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not what begging the question means.

    3. Re:True Bummer for our friends in Russia by Desler · · Score: 1

      +1 funny.

    4. Re:True Bummer for our friends in Russia by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      I guess you might have heard of a few of them, actually. Quite a few things are named after Russian scientists, mostly in Physics and Biology. Why, I don't know. But if you spend some time looking at genetics and nuclear physics, you can't help but stumble upon quite a few of them. A lot of stuff in that area is named after Russians. Like, say, Pavel Cherenkov who discovered the radiation named after him (and actually earned him a Nobel Prize).

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:True Bummer for our friends in Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like Lev Landau?

    6. Re:True Bummer for our friends in Russia by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Just because a Russian didn't invent the smartphone, it does not follow that there are no famous Russian scientists. Broaden your horizons. Quite a number of 20th century math fields are almost entirely Russian. And hey, those rocket scientists, the ones that keep boosting out American astronauts into space - they're exclusively Russian.

      Or, if you insist: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=famous+russian+scientists

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:True Bummer for our friends in Russia by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The rest of the world still cant do what Lysenko did 50+ years ago. Because it was all bullshit. Command economies are broken.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    8. Re:True Bummer for our friends in Russia by TheSync · · Score: 1

      How can you say there is no known famous Russian scientist?

      Trofim Lysenko ("Lysenkoism")
      Aleksandr Oparin ("Oparin hypothesis")
      Ivan Pavlov ("Pavlovian conditioning")
      Pafnuti Chebyshev ("Chebyshev polynomials")
      Leonhard Euler (OK, Swiss by birth, but did lots of good math in St. Petersburg)
      Andrey Kolmogorov ("Kolmogorov complexity")
      Aleksandr Lyapunov ("Lyapunov stability")
      Andrey Markov Sr. ("Markov chains")
      Andrei Sakharov (thermonuclear weapons)
      Heinrich Lenz ("Lenz's law")
      Alexei Yuryevich Smirnov ("Mikheyevâ"Smirnovâ"Wolfenstein neutrino oscillations")
      Pavel Alekseyevich Cherenkov ("Cherenkov radiation")

    9. Re:True Bummer for our friends in Russia by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      Man, name one name who is not older than my grand-grandgrandpa, please.

    10. Re:True Bummer for our friends in Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sergey Brin

    11. Re:True Bummer for our friends in Russia by Prune · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Lysenkoism is a great example of Russian (Soviet, really) pseudoscience.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    12. Re:True Bummer for our friends in Russia by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      Putting Lysenko on the list kind of undermines your point.

    13. Re:True Bummer for our friends in Russia by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Look into the history of Trofim Lysenko , dude. A famous Russian 'scientist.'

      During the Stalinist era, the official party line was bat-shit crazy non-science. It took the Russians a considerable amount of time to get over that nonsense.

    14. Re:True Bummer for our friends in Russia by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

      Recent Russian Nobel prize winners in physics:
      Andre Geim, 2010
      Konstantin Novoselov, 2010
      Alexei A. Abrikosov, 2003
      Vitaly Ginzburg, 2003
      Zhores Ivanovich Alferov, 2000

    15. Re:True Bummer for our friends in Russia by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      How can people forget Dmitri Mendeleev? That table of his has become mighty popular.

    16. Re:True Bummer for our friends in Russia by the_other_chewey · · Score: 1

      Recent Russian Nobel prize winners in physics:
      Andre Geim, 2010

      University of Manchester

      Konstantin Novoselov, 2010

      University of Manchester

      Alexei A. Abrikosov, 2003

      Argonne National Laboratory

      Vitaly Ginzburg, 2003

      P. N. Lebedev Physical Institute
      (OK, this one you can keep. He's dead though...)

      Zhores Ivanovich Alferov, 2000

      Ioffe Institute, St. Petersburg

      Two out of five.
      None out of three for "still working in their field" though (Alferov is 83 and a politician).

      I'm not even saying that you don't have a point. But you haven't made it so far.

    17. Re:True Bummer for our friends in Russia by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      During the Stalinist era, the official party line was bat-shit crazy non-science.

      It depends on which science. On biology, definitely. Also on history, linguistics (though Stalin himself ended up labeling the japhetic theory as pseudoscience in the end), and some other stuff. OTOH, most hard sciences - math, physics, chemistry - were developing quite well and receiving considerable funding from the state. There were some late half-hearted attempts to start a Lysenko-style campaign in physics against theory of relativity (the usual spin - bourgeois imperialist lackey Einstein inventing a false theory to attack the one and true philosophy of dialectic materialism as promulgated by great Lenin and advanced by great Stalin), but this died really fast because comrade Stalin believed in results first and foremost, and Beria was pretty clear on what science actually works for making nukes.

    18. Re:True Bummer for our friends in Russia by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Grigory Perelman?

    19. Re:True Bummer for our friends in Russia by hughk · · Score: 1

      Yes, two recent British Noble prize winners (Graphene) are actually Russian and spent most of their time there.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    20. Re:True Bummer for our friends in Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, because you're ignorant of course..! ;)

    21. Re:True Bummer for our friends in Russia by airdweller · · Score: 1

      Seriously? You couldn't even check Wikipedia before posting? Holy fuck you're an idiot :D

  5. In other news, Putin inaugurates Ministry of Truth by Raved+Thrad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "NYET! We will no longer allow science to tell us what the laws that govern the universe are! Starting today, it is the law that will govern science!!"

    --
    Life, ultimately, boils down to the Four Fs: Fighting, Fleeing, Feeding, and Mating.
  6. Government Revitalization of Science by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 2

    Well, this should prevent any resurgence of Lysenkoism or other such quackery. This puts Russian science in the forefront of government revitalization of science right along with the forward thinkers in the Canadian government.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  7. Soon to come... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New scientific reports from Russia of what homosexuality is bad.

    CAPTCHA: targets

  8. Makes sense by GODISNOWHERE · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They probably noticed that scientists can do things like prove that Russian elections are rigged.

    1. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect that the abbreviation for Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) is what prompted this troll to make a post about coprophila.

  9. Re:Egomania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of what's-his-name occupying the White House

    George Bush

  10. I guess they're following in Canada's footsteps by msobkow · · Score: 5, Informative

    Harper has been muzzling Canadian scientists for a long time, cutting their budgets, axing research, and so on.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:I guess they're following in Canada's footsteps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes he did and Canada also seems to be the only country in the G20 that isn't experiencing any major financial problems relative to the rest. He axed programs that weren't that important and can be re-instated later on when the world economy gets a little better.

      Harper is a bad prime minister because he's responsibly administering the State. Funny.

    2. Re:I guess they're following in Canada's footsteps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citations needed.

    3. Re:I guess they're following in Canada's footsteps by uncomformistsheep · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Funny enough, people in my country always say that long-term investments in R&D and etc are the last places you want to cut in a crises because they garantee our future.

      That's stupid. If you're in a crisis, you make sure everybody has food on the table, you get people into jobs, the economic going .. then you re-invest in the long-term stuff. This is obvious in a household. But for whatever reason it doesn't follow for some.

    4. Re:I guess they're following in Canada's footsteps by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Funny enough, people in my country always say that long-term investments in R&D and etc are the last places you want to cut in a crises because they garantee our future.

      That's stupid. If you're in a crisis, you make sure everybody has food on the table, you get people into jobs, the economic going .. then you re-invest in the long-term stuff. This is obvious in a household. But for whatever reason it doesn't follow for some.

      Maybe because a household =/= a whole goddamned state?

  11. Re:Egomania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill Clinton

  12. Re:Egomania by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    Don't you know? Putin is famous for his amazingly prescient scientific writings, just like his predecessors, comrades Lenin and Stalin. I can hardly wait how Puting trumps Lenin's work on the inexhaustibility of the electron. For the workers!

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  13. Re:Egomania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I think OP means the other warmongering surveillance-state authoritarian. You know, the guy currently squatting in the otherwise distinguished building.

  14. Re:Single-Payer Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a bit puzzled, but isn't that how science is effectively funded in western countries. Not having read the source article I suspect what is happening in Russian is different in tone. Why conflate with health care?

    Incidentally, I'm from a country with single payer health care have the same concerns as any vigilant and responsible citizen. No system can be perfect, so it's monitored and debated. So, what's your implicit point?

    [I could be wrong but based on your comments I conclude you're a simpleton. Simultaneously, I can also imagine that you're not alone. Though this discussion is about science, those like you cannot separate their "religious" positions from reality.]

  15. Czar Putin by Required+Snark · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I read this just before I looked at Slashdot

    Russian President Vladimir Putin said he didn't exclude running for a fourth term, in a move that would pave the way for him to remain in power until 2024.

    Wall Street Journal

    The article states that he's 61 years old, so this is more or less "president for life". If he lasts another 10 years he'll just do it again, or not even bother to hold an election.

    Russia's slide will continue if this happens. Of course the US has a similar problem with entrenched elites wrecking the economy for their own personal gain.

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
    1. Re:Czar Putin by tftp · · Score: 1

      The article states that he's 61 years old, so this is more or less "president for life". If he lasts another 10 years he'll just do it again, or not even bother to hold an election. Russia's slide will continue if this happens.

      Slide upward, you mean? Yes, that has to be stopped by any means possible.

      In most areas of expertise once we find a capable engineer, a good manager, we tend to keep them employed. But the rules of democracy say that such a manager has to be kicked out after a certain number of years in power. What for? If the people vote for him, they want him in power. It wouldn't make any difference if a clone shows up with a single bit of difference between the two, and the people elect him instead. The revolving door of limited term only forces the current ruler to fatten himself as much as possible while he is on top. Emperors seldom do that - their fate is tied to the fate of the country, and they often arrive to the chopping block first.

      It can be said that periodic, forced replacement of leaders reduces the risk of one-sided approach to problems. You can see an example of that in Venezuela. But is the benefit worth the cost?

    2. Re:Czar Putin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sort of strange "Russia's slide" since Russia has become a pretty big player in the world since Putin took over. I personally think term limits are anti-democratic. If elections are far and the people support the leader and keep on electing him (fairly) I don't see why he/she cannot be President for life. I am totally against term-limits.

    3. Re:Czar Putin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the benefit is worth the cost. The reason some countries have limitations on terms is precisely because of decisions like this one. Some of us prefer a slightly messy democracy to a slow strangulation of discussion and dissent.

    4. Re:Czar Putin by tftp · · Score: 1

      Some of us prefer a slightly messy democracy to a slow strangulation of discussion and dissent.

      OK. That is fine, and it is actually true. But here is another question. Are those who prefer the other option wrong? Not merely wrong from your point of view, but wrong from some external, absolute reference plane, so that we can declare people A to be undeniably right and people B to be undeniably wrong?

      If you say "yes, there is a way to declare them such" then you deny them their own way of development, and that is not democratic. If you say "no, there is no way to objectively judge decisions of another socium" then it has to be accepted that they could be right (or wrong) in their circumstances, and you could be right (or wrong) in your circumstances.

    5. Re:Czar Putin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia is not the US. Whereas the west in general prefers bullshiters, they prefer strength. And Putin has it, he recovered Russia after that buffon before him and doesn't bow down to anyone. Since they're a democracy, they have a right to vote for him again if they so wish. Oh, silly me. I almost forgot that whenever a country has a good leader he's an evil dictator and must be taken down by any means necessary and replaced by a friendly puppet.

    6. Re:Czar Putin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One can do oil upsliding without Putin just as well.

    7. Re:Czar Putin by tftp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One can do oil upsliding without Putin just as well.

      You are forgetting the oligarchs. Do you think any money would be spent on social needs or on defense or on reserves or on external debt or on stimulating the economy? Yeltsin's years are a good illustration of that situation: none of the above was done; all the money was taken by oligarchs, and the people were left to fend for themselves as they may.

      I won't say that Putin is flawlessly doing all that; however he is doing better than Yeltsin. Oligarchs know their place. Perhaps someone else would do it also pretty good; but the theory of probabilities is against you. If the incumbent is doing something at a good enough level, the newcomer has to explain why he, an untested politician, will do better - and how is he going to guarantee that. Russia is the origin of the game of Russian Roulette, but despite that not every voter is interested in a chance to buy a small incremental improvement if, if things go south, he can equally likely buy himself a large problem. In essence, Putin is "good enough" for most voters; a devil that you know. The only exception is voters who want "their man" in power, or who are simply thinking that people at the top should change every other week. They, poor souls, have no clue what they are asking for. There are people like that in every society. Hell, half of the USA is always against the sitting President, no matter if he is R or D. So what?

    8. Re:Czar Putin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're stuffing ballot boxes. Up to you to decide if that's objectively wrong or not.

    9. Re:Czar Putin by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Because like a baby's nappy, a politician who is around for too long starts to get smelly and stained. Not literally (like the nappy) but they do tend to get increasingly out of touch and increasingly damaging to their own nation.

      We've seen this happen in recent British history. Thatcher was prime minister for too long and her policies became more and more out of touch with reality towards the end until her party finally had to force her out of office, and the same thing happened with Tony Blair. Term limits are a good thing.

  16. Heh. by mirix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The TFA seems to imply the RAS has been wholly independent for 289 years, which is obviously not the case... It was founded by the tsar who I'd imagine had some sway.

    That and oh... it lived through the soviet union, which certainly had control.

    --
    Sent from my PDP-11
    1. Re:Heh. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even so, historically, it was surprisingly independent even at worst time. E.g. under Stalin, there were many things that Kapitsa said to him that no-one else dared - and got away with it.

      It also had one interesting quirk: the academic titles that it awarded could not be stripped by anyone else - and every government to date has respected this, and didn't pressure the Academy to strip the title even when a particular person was persecuted for his political beliefs. It is said that Stalin joked at some point that you can execute an academician with a stroke of the pen, but he would still die as one.

  17. Re:Single-Payer Science by cbhacking · · Score: 1

    The problem isn't who pays, it's who calls the shots.

    But, since you were either incapable of that basic bit of reading comprehension or chose to intentionally attempt to make this a politics issue, nothing you say is worth paying attention to anyhow.

    --
    There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  18. Truly a shame by ebno-10db · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is truly a shame. Back during the Cold War the question was often posed, is Russia the most backward advanced country in the world, or the most advanced backward country in the world. However, despite being cursed with horrid systems of government and an inability to make washing machines, anybody who knew anything admired their accomplishments in science and math. Now Putty Poot wants to kill that? He's a traitor.

    1. Re:Truly a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a traitor.

      We finally see where your heart lies even when your lips don't.

    2. Re:Truly a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      an inability to make washing machines

      You mean like these?

    3. Re:Truly a shame by Gorshkov · · Score: 2

      Back during the Cold War the question was often posed, is Russia the most backward advanced country in the world, or the most advanced backward country in the world

      The "rule of thumb" breakdown was like this: Anything that required physical equipment (powerful computers, test rigs, etc) they sucked at, because they didn't have it. Anything that did NOT require physical equipment (mathematics, optics, theoretical physics, etc), they excelled at.

      I remember when I was doing my linguist course while in the Navy, back in '82. One of my instructor's husband had PhD in physics - they were Jewish, and had only been able to leave the Soviet Union the year before. He saw the chess programme I had on my Radio Shack Model I (yes, I'm that old), and nearly freaked - not because of the chess programme, but because he'd never seen a computer that powerful - and he couldn't believe he could just go to the store and actually *buy* one.

  19. Re:Egomania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Putin hold PhD in economics. Someone wrote it for him, it was a simple Russian translation of western article. (don't worry, he's dead. most likely killed himself). So, after that surfaced Putin fills like his scientific superiority is in danger. And he doesn't like or trust other scientists. Hence the strong wish to control and humiliate them all. I expect someone from his close circle to become the "main" scientist in Russia.

    BTW, Chechen leader Kadyrov holds PhD too. Another genius ;)

  20. In Soviet Russia... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In Soviet Russia... this academy had more freedom than it does now.

    Wow.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    1. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Jade_Wayfarer · · Score: 1

      Hahahaha... no.

      Please, read something about sharaga's, and think about reconsidering your statement.

      --
      Absence of proof != proof of absence.
  21. Re:Single-Payer Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe his point was that there those who argue that governments should have bigger stakes in certain endeavors like NASA in the US, but everyone here seems to be lamenting that this is the end of science because the state is taking full control of this program - which being russia I'm assuming was fully government funded before anyway, just more autonomous from direction by the duma.

  22. Re:Single-Payer Science by PapayaSF · · Score: 1

    "He who has the gold, makes the rules."

    And try to laugh more.

    --
    Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
  23. a new place to send the bribes to? by pesho · · Score: 1

    60-billion-rouble (US$1.9-billion) budget and extensive property portfolio, which includes lucrative sites in Moscow and St Petersburg

    So it is not about the quality or independence of science. It is about who will be collecting, hmm what's the word ... "royalties"?.... on the management of the budget and the properties.

    1. Re:a new place to send the bribes to? by Jade_Wayfarer · · Score: 1

      Bingo! Most of these "poor oppressed academicians" are quite rich people, even by European/USA standards. Of course they don't want to lose their income.

      --
      Absence of proof != proof of absence.
  24. Stalin returns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russia is quickly going back to the days of Stalin. Bit by bit the dictatorship is being reformed and soon they will pass the tipping point where anything can be done to stop it. If I was Russian, I would be very afraid.

  25. Reform is unavoidable, and has to be done quickly. by Jade_Wayfarer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Really biased summary and somewhat biased article. RAS is simply afraid of losing their luxurous "recreational complexes" - private villas of said academicians and "research institutes", which are mostly just "cheap offices for rent" right now. Our science is going down the drain for the last... 30-40 years, or even more, and all these old soviet-era "academicians" are much more old-school bureaucrats than scientists. Truly clever and talented people all left Russia in 90-s, leaving mostly conservative old-timers and not-so-bright yesterday students. One of the vice-presidents of RAS is known to support some absolutely fraudulent projects, like "Petrik's water filters" - and these people are saying something about liquidation of science?

    I am not a supporter of Putin and his little auto-/pluto-cratic system of government, but this reform is something long-needed, almost essential for our science. With the 40-50 years old mindset you cannot innovate, you cannot truly create something new, perform some cutting-edge experiments and achieve true breakthroughs. Only with adaptation of new policies, with adequate pay and real prospects of work for the young scientists we can hope to see our science pull itself out of its current horrible state. And this time, as preposterous as it sounds, Putin is on the side of progress. Of course there is no clearly defined "good guy" in this whole situation, but RAS in its modern form is much worse than almost anything that can replace it.

    --
    Absence of proof != proof of absence.
  26. Re:Egomania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ronald Reagan.

    Man convinced us he killed communism.

    He didn't.

  27. in soviet russia by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    we take over you!

    1. Re:in soviet russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In American analysis, there is little value, as it is based on prejudice 99% of time.

  28. Who runs Russia? by onebeaumond · · Score: 2

    Most would say the Russian Mafia. Putin is their Ronald Reagan professional actor-leader. But there are no Italians in Russia, so who are these Mafia people? Well, they are the "businessmen" of course. That's businessmen, with big scary quotes. Not really the greatest fans of scientists, unless they can build them a cool looking yacht.

  29. As an "American" scientist working abroad ... by acidfast7 · · Score: 0

    Snowden should be happy as the funding (success) rates are much better in Russia than the US. LOL at you for dragging Snowden into a science argument. Take a break from FOX "news."

    1. Re:As an "American" scientist working abroad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't a science debate, this is a government policy debate. Are those "funding (success) rates" you speak of mainly government funding, as in Russian government funding? If so, do they have that much money, that few scientists, or are the awards small? I notice you used scare quotes around "American," ... I'll bet you're a "patriot" too, but which sort? Russian? There is more news on Fox than "insight" from you. Of course then there is the whole RT Putin "truth machine." LOL at you.

    2. Re:As an "American" scientist working abroad ... by acidfast7 · · Score: 1

      LOL ... when you can talk science get back to me.

    3. Re:As an "American" scientist working abroad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In short, you've got nothing. LOL

  30. Re:Single-Payer Science by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I believe his point was that there those who argue that governments should have bigger stakes in certain endeavors like NASA in the US, but everyone here seems to be lamenting that this is the end of science because the state is taking full control of this program - which being russia I'm assuming was fully government funded before anyway, just more autonomous from direction by the duma.

    The Russian Academy of Sciences has had moderate autonomy in terms of spending. They've never been funded to a level commensurate with perceived need (sound familiar?) but they had quite a bit of leeway in terms of funding individual projects. That has never been completely true, of course - the military has often worked through the Academy on projects they're interested in (and funded). The Politburo has had significant input into how various fields are funded. What appears to be the issue is that the Institute Directors will be potentially political appointees, responsible to His Glorious Putiness. We may be seeing many more studies on wrestling and tigers.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  31. that's just bad translation by ScudBee · · Score: 1

    Think of it as an institute for communications studies.

  32. Re:Single-Payer Science by Arker · · Score: 1

    They are one and the same. Who pays the piper, calls the tune.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  33. Re:Single-Payer Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In practice, Replace gold with USD!

  34. Liquidation of science by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    TFA quotes:

    This is not a reform — this is a liquidation of science in Russia

    Wasn't that supposed to have been done during the Boris Yeltsin era?

  35. Look out Russian environment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You being targeted for a Soviet style mass destruction. All those pesky scientists saying having an environment is good be will silenced!

  36. Private sector funding. by iiiears · · Score: 1

    It seems possible that government funding is as responsive to the private sector and there will be more money available to researchers when they can more easily accept corporate donations. That is just my 2 ruble opinion.

    --
    15TW = 15,000 Nuclear Reactors. (Approx. one accident a month.)
    1. Re:Private sector funding. by deviated_prevert · · Score: 2

      It seems possible that government funding is as responsive to the private sector and there will be more money available to researchers when they can more easily accept corporate donations. That is just my 2 ruble opinion.

      You can bet the private sector funding to science will start to explode in Russia. Especially for scientific analysis to prove that there are no problems with the mega project models of everything currently being planned by the new economic titans of Russia.

      These involve corporations set up for wholesale cutting of the forests in the Urals, southern Siberia and the Kamchatka and then selling whole logs on world markets at fire sale prices. Or the upgrades to the Siberian railway to move oil to China and the west cheaper than pipe lines. All the while controlled by the new rulers of Russia, a very small elite who will do the same thing a very small elite is currently doing elsewhere, namely what they specialize in which is take the money and run entire countries economies.

      In Canada we have companies that pay for "scientific studies" to prove that fencing in all the woodland Caribou left in Alberta will protect them from the removal of the forest by the massive oil sands projects. Science is being perverted by industry in such a way as to become a false religion. We were taught in school to respect science and now the backbone of our belief in science is being subverted by those who in reality could care less about future generations. Science that is paid for by industry to "prove something" is pseudo science and that goes for all the pseudo sciences especially ones like "political science" and any "environmental science" which is paid for by those with a vested interest in raping the environment as quickly and cheaply as possible.

      We in Canada have the same bullshit going on, the pipeline to Kitimat BC to ship oil and natural gas is silently being done and the pseudo science to prove how efficient and safe the process will be is being ramped up as our scientists who might raise real objections to the insanity are also being muzzled. All over the world there is an assault going on against scientists, we have scientists in the US being paid to disprove things. This started with industries like the tobacco industry then went on the the asbestos industry and is now a firmly established method of the oil industry. All of whom at one time have enlisted government help through political cronyism and paid for pseudo science to disprove things. Why should we expect the Russians to fall behind in the lucrative field of the modern pseudo sciences? "ask not what your country".... BULLSHIT WHAT'S IN IT FOR ME? YOU LIBERAL COMMIE ASSHOLES!

      --
      This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
  37. Stupid is as stupid does... by KlomDark · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is this whole damn planet just gonna get stupid now? This is not at all what they showed us in Star Trek. Damn, 40 years ago we are putting people on the moon, now it's just global navel gazing from here on out. Yeee haaawww.

    Fuck, we are screwed.

    1. Re:Stupid is as stupid does... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah in Star Trek we were waste deep in a post WWIII shithole right now. God reality sucks.

    2. Re:Stupid is as stupid does... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Is this whole damn planet just gonna get stupid now? This is not at all what they showed us in Star Trek. Damn, 40 years ago we are putting people on the moon, now it's just global navel gazing from here on out. Yeee haaawww.

      Fuck, we are screwed.

      Australia's new Prime Minister just abolished the cabinet position for Science Minister. First time since the 1930s we've not had a member of parliament charged witha science portfolio. The world has gone insane.

    3. Re:Stupid is as stupid does... by Macchendra · · Score: 1

      Yeah in Star Trek we were waste deep in a post WWIII shithole right now. God reality sucks.

      Working on it, please be patient...

    4. Re:Stupid is as stupid does... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You see doom I see opportunity. He who can innovate better than those around him will flourish. Google showed the way (even though by all accounts they are starting to implode on their own bureaucracy).

      He who risks it all can gain it all.
      He who risks nothing gets nothing.

  38. Re:Reform is unavoidable, and has to be done quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It probably needs a reform, but that doesn't means it needs this reform. Dictators are good at giving good reasons for their power grab, and then totally ignoring the good reasons.

  39. same thing happening here in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just implemented by defunding government funded science and making sure that honest scientists can't report results without being fired. Same result - feedback from reality is suppressed in favor of short term economic and political gains.

  40. Strange bedfellows by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
    Fundamentalist Christians and anti-science Conservatives are impressed. Finally, science being throttled and put in it's place.

    Pope Urban VIII is now beaming in heaven, being vindicated. Politics and religion has emerged victorious over truth.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  41. Re:Egomania by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 0

    He tore down the Berlin Wall. He caused the USSR to cease to exist. And he caused Eastern Europe to become liberated from the Russians who had been occupying them.

  42. Re: I guess they're following in Canada's footstep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Harper gets elected in 2006, and some of the first things they do are too weaken mortgage rules, try to introduce 30 year amortizations, and yet he gets credit because the financial system the Liberals developed didn't implode in 2008.

    Makes total sense.

  43. So just like in the US and Canada then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the Russians are doing what the US did under George W. Bush, and what Canada has been doing for at least the last 7 years. Basic research takes a severe hit. If whatever you are working on doesn't have a business plan which within 5 years if it doesn't make a profit, gets instantly killed. If you are doing research on fish and pollution, its hard to make a profit on that (for example). That Putin doesn't want people who think logically not towing the official line is a big a threat to his ego as it was to George dubya and is to Steven Harper and other right wingers who think only in profit and loss and don't get 'science'.

  44. Here Comes Lootin' Putin.... by unitron · · Score: 1

    After he separates them from their liquidateable assets, do you suppose he'll let the R.O.C. start officially deciding what it and isn't science?

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  45. Re:Reform is unavoidable, and has to be done quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally, the voice of reason.
    The System WAS broken before the reform, and you would be hard-pressed to make it worse.

  46. Re:In other news, Putin inaugurates Ministry of Tr by deviated_prevert · · Score: 1

    "NYET! We will no longer allow science to tell us what the laws that govern the universe are! Starting today, it is the law that will govern science!!"

    Putin stole his ideas on how to control scientists from Stephen Harper! Canada first in the science of the scientific control of information coming out of scientists. Hell too bad we didn't patent it. Could sell like hot cakes when the Republicans resume control of the White House with their tighty whities in a few years. LOL

    --
    This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
  47. Re:Reform is unavoidable, and has to be done quick by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not saying that everything you wrote is false, but even if every single word of it was true, it still doesn't make the reform good. There's certainly corruption in the Academy, but there's also still plenty of real science being done. With control transferred fully to government bureaucrats, corruption is only bound to increase, and everything immaterial to the goal of enrichment through fraud will be promptly get rid of. What's even worse is that the Church is also raising its head and demanding a say in education and other spheres of life run by the state, and, so far, they have been mostly getting what they want... and now that the state controls scientific institutes directly, I would not put it past them to start stalling or even outright suppressing the lines of research that are contrary to Orthodox doctrine or the prevailing beliefs - evolutionary biology, say, or human cloning.

    So, yes, this will spell the death knell of science in long term, unless a great many other things change.

  48. Re:In other news, Putin inaugurates Ministry of Tr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first item on their list should be to decree the exact value of pi to equal 3.14

  49. scientists on the cheap by mandginguero · · Score: 1

    Imagine if the US were to reinvigorate its sciences. Double the current research budget - drop in the box if they passed a tax measure - invest in their trained talent, and pick up some Russians too. Some country would be smart to pick them up before they jump ship to other professions.

    --
    i don't know karate, but i know ca-razy
  50. Re:In other news, Putin inaugurates Ministry of Tr by Raved+Thrad · · Score: 1

    Don't be ridiculous! That would only make it difficult for the mathematically-challenged! It should be rounded up to 3.2, as has been proposed before by logical Americans who understand that natural law cannot be allowed to supersede the legal sensibilities of wrong-headed yammerheads!

    --
    Life, ultimately, boils down to the Four Fs: Fighting, Fleeing, Feeding, and Mating.
  51. Re:Reform is unavoidable, and has to be done quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Erich Fellgiebel was in his 50s when he ran the German government's R&D programs as General der Nachrichtentruppe (Signal Corps/Military Intelligence). Under his watch they developed the A4 missile (which is the basis of all liquid-fueled spaceflight to the present day), the jet engine, TV-guided smartbombs and quite a few more things. Allegedly they also invented the semiconductor diode.

    So maybe you general statement of "people in the 40s to 50s don't innovate" is not true in its totality.

  52. Re:Reform is unavoidable, and has to be done quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As a second point, I am reaching age 40 and just now I do think I can deliver solid results as a software engineer/computer scientist. Between age 25 and age 35 I essentially self-trained myself out of novice mistakes. And I see almost exactly the same behaviour in people who are 25 to 30 with a similar education.

  53. Re:Reform is unavoidable, and has to be done quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you really think Putin is a dumb man, think again. He rescued Russia from a tailspin that would have destroyed it entirely as a state.

    Plus, when was that Academy of Science "independent", given that they are paid by the state and given the iron fist control of everything from 1925 to 1990 by the Communist Party and their secret police ?

    Just now western fighters reach the same class of sophistication as the Mig-31 Radar of the 1980s. The S-400 missile system is probably the best SAM in existence.

    Russia has incredible human and intellectual reserves and they have capable officers, secret police and otherwise. Putin can't just play the tough-leather-jacket-guy.

    You and I know too little to properly assess this decision. Applying some crude Ayn-Rand meme doesn't enlighten anybody.

  54. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The question is why: what is the benefit of making an academic institution run directly by government bureaucrats? What is the intended purpose? I guess that we will see in the next few years.

  55. The true reasons behind this by ElusiveJoe · · Score: 1

    The first reason behind this "reform" is to steal and sell Academy's real property, the only Soviet legacy which has not been stolen until now. The scheme is traditional to Putins' friends:
    1. Pour state money into property, paying for its repair, landscape development and luxury buildings. All paid by simple Russian citizens.
    2. Name the property as "unuseful" and sell it to the pocket company for a laughable sum.
    3. Resell the property for its market value. Share millions of $$$ between government officials, who let that happen.

    The second reason is political. The Academy and scientific society in Russia was a pain in the ass for Putin, with his neo-religious policy and his fraudulent friends. Several dozens (!) of government officials have been caught with fake scientific works full of plagiarism. The "miraculous" water filters, which were going to be forced by one of Putin's friends in power to be installed in every Russian city, were shown to be a hoax. There were many, many other collisions between scientific society and our fraudulent government. But it is over now.

    Stay tuned for new "scientific" discoveries, about how Holy Water heals cancer and a prayer lessens rocket failure rate. Assuming we will still have rockets.

  56. Re:Reform is unavoidable, and has to be done quick by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Putin is not a dumb man, but there's considerable evidence that he does not have the best interests of the country and his citizens in mind.

    The Academy of Science had a lot of independence in terms of how it organized itself, and, to a considerable extent, on its research. The commie "iron fist" did apply, but even that was significantly less binding on the Academy even under Stalin compared to most other state institutions.

    I don't know why you bring up MiG-31 and S-400. These are Soviet scientific and engineering advances, not modern Russian ones (well, S-400 is, but it is really just a slightly improved S-300 - the original designation is S-300PM3). And they are developed by design bureaus that were set up in Soviet times and largely stuffed by the same personnel. There has been very little that Russia can actually boast of developing from scratch, or at least with significant advances, since the collapse of USSR, because its R&D infrastructure has been decaying. Putin did not reverse that trend.

    The only thing you need to know to properly assess this decision is to look at how the state has managed other projects. Look no further than the Sochi Olympics - a cesspit of corruption and kickbacks. Or the various property deals in Moscow. By now, I would rather ask for proof that the same exact thing will not happen to the Academy, since the trend is definitely the other way around...

    And I don't know what Ayn Rand has to do with all this. The discussion here is not whether Academy of Sciences must be private or not - as you've noted, it was never private, and of course it shouldn't be. The question is whether the administration and management of the academy, its resources and personnel is to be done by government bureaucrats from the outside, or by scientists themselves on the inside.

  57. Re:Reform is unavoidable, and has to be done quick by Jade_Wayfarer · · Score: 1

    Sorry, maybe my selection of words was incorrect - "40-50 years old" should mean "40-50 years ago old".

    --
    Absence of proof != proof of absence.