Slashdot Mirror
Romanian Science Journal Punked By Serbian Academics
schwit1 writes "A group of Serbian academics, disgusted with the poor state of their country's research output, have scammed a Romanian science journal by getting it to accept their completely fabricated hoax article. From the article: 'The paper is replete with transparent gimmicks — obvious, that is, had anyone at the publication been paying attention — including a reference to the scholarship of [singer Michael] Jackson, Weber, [porn star Ron] Jeremy and citations to new studies by Bernoulli and Laplace, both dead more than 180 years (Weber died in 1920). They also throw in references to the "Journal of Modern Illogical Studies," which to the best of our knowledge does not and never has existed (although perhaps it should), and to a researcher named, dubiously, "A.S. Hole." And, we hasten to add, the noted Kazakh polymath B. Sagdiyev, otherwise known as Borat.' Their paper is hilarious and completely ridiculous, and yet it was published in a so-called serious journal without question. The best part is that they list Alan Sokal's hoax paper from 1996 as one of their sources."
Disgusted with the poor state of Serbia's research output, I will now also scam a Romanian science journal.
The "Journal of Modern Illogical Studies" does exist, it's just called slashdot.
"Finally, we give interestingly looking results of a study and show how they could be presented in a visually appealing way."
Well I suppose it's better than driving tanks into each other, but it's still not very polite.
both dead more than 180 years (Weber died in 1920).
I never noticed it was after 2100. I didn't even notice falling into a cryogenic chamber. Weird.
Bernoulli and Laplace, both dead more than 180 years (Weber died in 1920)
Looks like the first author photoshopped himself a moustache, nice touch
As a Romanian I'd like this to become "a thing".
Everyone disgusted by their country's research output should scam a Romanian journal. Or, even better, it doesn't even have to be related to science, it can be about everything. And it doesn't have to be a journal, you can all come here and shout it in the public square.
We can become a stage for anyone who wants to express disgust about everything.
Curiously yours, crip.
Journal publishing as it exists now is not based on science, it is based on commerce and politics. We need a better system that does not shut out and scam real scientists. The sooner this kind of thing comes to light the better. Good on them!!!
"[...] and citations to new studies by Bernoulli and Laplace, both dead more than 180 years (Weber died in 1920)."
Bernoulli and Laplace, unlike Ortega and Gasset, are two people, which qualifies them to be "both".
Serbs are mad at their science establishment so they go off and ridicule Romanians? What, them East Europeans all the same?!
Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
both dead more than 180 years (Weber died in 1920).
I never noticed it was after 2100. I didn't even notice falling into a cryogenic chamber. Weird.
That's because its talking about Bernoulli and Laplace!
The obvious giveaway is the lack equations. Regardless of how aloof the reviewers are to pop culture references, the lack of equations should have forewarned a lack of solid results.
"Both" in that sentence refers to Bernoulli and Laplace, not Weber, which is why it doesn't say "Bernoulli, Laplace and Weber" and "the three of them".
The state of current science publishing is rather appalling in general. I review for various conferences and journals in CS (not bad ones), and I can tell you that papers are often accepted based on author names and affiliations, and not on their contents. I can imagine that in a marginal journal in a small country the standards are even lower.
Is this real? (Metallurgia International's web site appears to be gone, so there's no direct proof).
Surely even the worst kind of journal would ask that the Error! Reference source not found broken cross-references be fixed?
Poor slashdot article summary, the In Serbia magazine explains more clearly why this was done: the authors did it to ridicule the "hyperproduction of quasi-scientific works by Serbian professors that are published in the magazines of dubious quality" - they are having a pop at Serbian professors knocking out poor quality rubbish with more concern for volume than quality, and to where ever they can get them published. That said, I'd say this implies there's some definitive criticism at the low editorial quality of the Romanian publication for taking the article without identifying it as a hoax, and probably some commentary on the pressures of being a Serbian academic, looks like their universities or national funding bodies put them under pressure to produce volume and don't look too carefully at the quality when deciding how to fund their researchers.
This clearly has nothing to do with being "disgusted with the poor state of their country's research output". Had this really been their intention, they would have published in a Serb science journal, not a Romanian one. Though in a small country like Serbia that would have likely been a career suicide.
That said, and having now read the links (hey at least I read them), the following is a more accurate description and should have been in the summary instead: "The professors, otherwise experts in the area of information systems, had enough seeing many colleagues easily publishing their works in magazines like this one and in this way come to the points they need to move into higher positions."
So, it appears to be more of a case of jealousy than anything (though rightful it would seem).
That makes sense. I get a couple of 'call for papers' emails a day from dubious journals, often with such broad titles as 'The Journal of Modern Research', so it would be completely impossible for them to rate articles. The research establishment in the UK has tried quite hard over the last decade to counter this 'publish loads of crap' incentive. The old Research Assessment Exercise and the new Research Excellence Framework by which departments are assessed requires a small number (about one per year) of 'research outputs'. These can be high-impact papers, books, and so on, and in computer science can include things like published open source software (which counts as technology transfer if you can point to people using it).
I am TheRaven on Soylent News
The number of "researchers" across the globe has increased by an order of magnitude in the last few decades.
The amount of useful research done has not.
What do you think is being done by most people...?
Academia is something venerated only by people not in academia, who like to be associated with it. And sometimes by the younger, less secure people in academia who are not yet experienced enough to question the quality of their own work, let alone others' (this isn't a criticism - it's a standard problem of youth). There's as much bullshit here as anywhere else, you know.
What I recall from my years in a post-Soviet Ukrainian university is a system that works like this. You need to publish N papers and a thesis to get your PhD, then publish M books and a thesis to get your Dr Math / whatever degree, then curate enough students, publish some more books and play some politics to become a Professor. All of this to increase your salary from $200/mo to $300/mo. All this work is judged purely on quantity. There are good scientists that also do something meaningful in parallel, and shameless bureaucrats who just spend the rest of their time looking for more ways to get corrupted. But no-one really takes the publishing game seriously.
In order to get a better bang for their dollar, Serbian government made some radical changes regarding the pay grades of researchers in state universities and institutes. The most important metrics is now the number of publications in the high impact factor journals.
In principle, the idea is not terribly bad. Academic success is being measured by some quantitative objective criteria.
Unfortunately, in practice the system is far from ideal. The problem begins with "impact factor". Too many journals are gaming the system. This is a global international phenomenon.
Upon the introduction of the new system, few unscrupulous Serbian researchers began exploiting the obvious loophole. Namely, there are tons of journals worldwide, who will happily take one's money and publish whatever junk one sends. For whatever reason they carry high impact factor. Few of these "scientists" built entire carriers using this shameful practice.
The prank has been widely publicized in Serbian news outlets and more than served its purpose.
The journal 'Metalurgia International' is a hoax in itself. I bet it has about 6 subscribers, none of whom actually read it.
It doesn't have a web site and it's Facebook page has 3 likes, probably from the guy who publishes the journal, his wife and mistress.
Knowing how stuff works in Romania, this is probably just a cover for receiving state funding, eg. one or a couple of guys who have a politician as a friend or relative. They keep it low and quiet as long as no one notices - just copy & paste some stuff every month and get their monthly $5k.
I also bet that the vast majority of 'academics' or 'scientists' publish their papers (of no greater scientific value than the Serbian hoax seen here) in such obscure journals in order to get a higher score on some academic metric. Plagiarism is also norm, you just have to invest a couple of hours to shuffle the words around and maybe add a line or two to some equations. Next day you can publish your doctorate - with some friendly smiles and a thick envelope you're welcome to the club.
They then become experts and join some state agency or committee and offer their 'expert' advice to politicians or create policies out of their asses. These guys know right from wrong, they just bullshit themselves so much that they actually believe that their case is special and they are entitled to these shortcuts, because they struggled, morally that is, and did what they had to do, because this is how things work.
Scientists of higher moral standard, who actually spend time and effort doing real research, end up working for these guys and either become failures or give up and do something else.
This is how shit works in most parts of the world so for me it's no surprise at all.
...is at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3eeeG...
Ithankyeeu....
Please check this out:
http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen/
This is a random paper generator, and its output has been accepted at a conference.
There are plenty of low-quality conferences and publications.
Publications are flying onto the shelves faster than the speed of light. Its ok, they contain no useful information so the laws of physics are intact.
http://www.jir.com/
http://thatsmathematics.com/blog/archives/102
The summary didn't note one of the best references: Steve Stifler, a.k.a the Stifmeister.
Oh oh, there is a mistake in that paper, "Ortega y Gasset" is a surname and thus, shouldn't be translated.
Low quality (scam?) journal accepts dubious paper... news at 11. I'm totally unsurprised that they were able to pull this off and not that concerned. There are no barriers to running a peer reviewed journal so there are plenty of low quality journals, and even more scam journals/conferences. Everyone in the fields know what the respectable paper venues are, and it's pretty easy to find out what the respectable venues are in other fields.
Laplace and Bernoulli have been dead more than 180 years. The mentioning of Weber is weird, but perhaps a translation issue since Weber is mentioned earlier in the sentence.
And to think, I was just ignoring them. Clearly we've all missed an opportunity to get mentioned on Slashdot.
I know this is /. .... :)
but you really should take a few peeks at the paper. It made me laugh
Some investigators agree that simulation through generating random data is an interesting new topic in the field of information discovery, and more and more researchers concur. On the sceptic side, many scientists would agree that, had it not been for the necessity of providing meaningful results, many of existing solutions would be self-sufficient, and, sensing this, we set to show that randomness is indeed often used as an opportunistic “golden standard” of appositeness to further recycle the subject at hand.
Hmm, the humour and sarcasm seem to have been be lost on you.
Do your beloved academic friend a prank: ask him/her to review the paper without a previous warning about the scam and see the outcome :-)
...which they also list under references. Or at least it used to exist from 1974 until its cancellation in 2001.
It was a comic book magazine featuring stories with Disney characters.
[18] Silja, P. Pronalazac. "Odgovoran zadatak". in M. Meraklija,T. Luftika (eds.) Mikijev zabavnik, no. 1233 pp. 19-21, 2000.
They referenced Goofy and Gyro Gearloose.
Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
Wow, did they really built entire carriers using this shameful practice? The whole thing, including planes? :)
I get a couple of 'call for papers' emails a day from dubious journals, often with such broad titles as 'The Journal of Modern Research', so it would be completely impossible for them to rate articles.
I've seen this too - in journals having such broad titles as "Science" and "Nature". There's no way they could possibly rate the articles in them. Obviously those journals are worthless.
Silja, P. Pronalazac
. “
Odgovoran zadatak”
. in M. Meraklija,T. Luftika (eds.) Mikijev zabavnik, no. 1233 pp. 19-21, 2000 - In serbian Silja is Goofy,and "Mikijev zabavnik" is Mickey mouse magazine published in Serbia.
As for author last name K. Drkenda, well its root comes from the manual activity of lonely males
As always, Hitler parody has the best and most accurate explanation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3eeeGvWr-8 Hitler finds out that Metalurgia International has been debunked.
Yes, the problem with the paper being accepted is that they missed that typo!
Wow, your reading comprehension is about as good as a Serbian academic's.
Speaking about references, one of them (number 18) is actually Mickey Mouse comic with Goofy cited as the author (Serbian translation).
More info with names (for serbian readers): http://dropproxy.com/u/5AE/metalurgia/novo/index.html
After tracking down that particular issue, I've found out that the referenced story is Gyro-less.
It's a Goofy only story.
So even their fake reference is referencing fake authors.
Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens