Slashdot Mirror


Bill Gates Acknowledges Ctrl+Alt+Del Was a Mistake

theodp writes "If he'd had his druthers, Bill Gates told a Harvard audience, Ctrl+Alt+Del would never have seen the light of day. However, an IBM keyboard designer didn't want to give Microsoft a single button to start things up, and thus the iconic three-finger-salute was born."

15 of 665 comments (clear)

  1. Re: So why is it used in Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ctrl+Alt+Delete is, or was at least, a so called "non maskeable interrupt". This makes it harder for Trojan viruses to take over the login screen and steal your password.

  2. Revisionist history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ctrl-Alt-Del was a thing *before* Windows. Microsoft made use of it because it was there. It made sense to use it as a login trigger by intercepting its function. Especially since doing so put the reboot function under the control of the OS, not the user.

    Yes, I've only read the summary, not the article itself, but I suggest you read this in conjunction with it, or afterwards:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ctrl_alt_del

    1. Re:Revisionist history by DickBreath · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ctrl-Alt-Del generates a non maskable interrupt. Yes it was there before Windows, and even before DOS. If an OS wants to react to it other than instantly rebooting, said OS needs to install an interrupt handler for it. That interrupt handler is fired at a way lower level than ordinary keystrokes, malware, or friendly userspace applications.

      Using Ctrl-Alt-Del to trigger login gives you two kinds of security:
      1. Software cannot simulate a Ctrl-Alt-Del in order to play games with the login screen.
      2. By first pressing Ctrl-Alt-Del, the user logging on can be quite sure that they are giving their login credentials to a genuine Windows (or whatever OS) login screen, and not some malware that merely resembles the login screen.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  3. Re:Redundant keys by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hell, not only do I not use it, I can't think of many times I have even heard people mention it.

    Woe betide you should you ever find yourself on a Windows machine without a mouse, then. Can't say I use it often but when I do I'm glad it exists.
    =Smidge=

  4. Re:Redundant keys by jonbryce · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is no Right Alt key. There is an Alt-Gr key, which isn't needed in the US, but in Europe, you need it to type characters that aren't on the main keyboard. For example, using my UK keyboard, Alt-Gr + 4 will type the € symbol, and Alt-Gr + e will type the letter é.

  5. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by swillden · · Score: 4, Informative

    Perhaps, in the past.I seriously doubt that is still true. Modern USB keyboards have no special handling for C-A-D.

    Neither did old keyboards, but that's not the point. The point is that the operating system's low-level keyboard drivers have special handling for it, at a level that can't be modified by trojans unless they can muck with the deepest parts of the system internals -- and if they can do that then they already completely own the machine anyway.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  6. Re:So why is it used in Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    its not urban legend. that is exactly, and Bill Gates himself says it so on the first paragraph that Bill talks in the summary's linked article:
    From http://www.geekwire.com/2013/gates-harvard/

    “You want to have something you do with the keyboard that is signaling to a very low level of the software — actually hard-coded in the hardware — that it really is bringing in the operating system you expect, instead of just a funny piece of software that puts up a screen that looks like a log-in screen, and then it listens to your password and then it’s able to do that,” Gates said.

  7. Re:ADB by NJRoadfan · · Score: 5, Informative

    PCs were held back by the AT standard power supply, which used a hard wired power switch. Only a handful of OEMs used "soft" power switches. IBM was one of the first using it in their PS/1 machines back in 1992 or so. Apple started using them even earlier. It wasn't until ATX style power supplies that soft power switches became universal on PCs around 1998 or so. The introduction of ACPI really pushed for it since it needed full control of system power.

  8. Re:So why continue it... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The point of using control-alt-delete is that it's a key combination that can not be caught by any userspace process that does not have a special permission. This means that it's impossible to spoof the login screen on Windows without already having compromised the kernel. It doesn't matter what the key combination is, as long as it's one that is not delivered by the normal keypress event delivery mechanisms. Control-alt-delete is a reasonable choice, because no application author is likely to complain that they can't use this shortcut combination.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  9. Re:Redundant keys by pla · · Score: 4, Informative

    Woe betide you should you ever find yourself on a Windows machine without a mouse, then.

    Shift-F10.

  10. Re:Redundant keys by ozbon · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's a system setting, you can mess with it (assuming Admin rights) through control panel.

    Control Panel > Users > Manage User Accounts > Advanced

    At the bottom, "Secure sign-in" - take the tick out of that, and Apply.

    --
    I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
  11. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since most can't seem to be bothered to read the TFA, you're all a bit confused.

    Gates isn't opposed to the three finger salute for rebooting, he's decrying M$ use of Ctrl-Alt-Delete to LOGIN TO WINDOWS.
    It would be nice if the title represented the story accurately, but this is slashdot.

  12. Re:So why continue it... by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 5, Informative

    I use the Start key all of the time. Seriously. I use it in the following manner, essentially as a keyboard shortcut and linux holdover:

    *Start* (type some keys) (enter) to launch a program.
    Frequent uses include "cal" for Calculator, "not" for notepad, "wor" for Word, and "add or remove" for the Program Manager

    *Start* (# key) to bring up window #.
    One uses include Start+1 (Currently set to the Google App Launcher) (then used as the first example)
    Another is Start+2, which is always my E-mail application (across multiple computers)

    *Start*+R to bring up the "Run" dialog
    Frequent uses from the Run dialog are "dxdiag", "cmd", and "regedit"

    *Start*+D to "Show Desktop"
    Admittedly used less now with the prevalence of two monitors

    *Start*+E to bring up Explorer
    Used ALL THE TIME

    *Start*+CTRL+TAB to bring up a listing of all windows
    Admittedly, this is mapped to a StrokeIt Gesture shortcut (but the point stands)

    *Start*+DirectionalArrow (Up/Down/Left/Right)
    Used to move, maximize, and restore a window. Try it, Start+Left will put a window at half of your left screen. SUPER USEFUL. USED ALL THE TIME. EXTRA POINTS ON A BIG MONITOR. This is the fastest way to move windows to a second monitor.

    I probably do 90% of these every day. I use the Start key as much as CTRL and ALT.

  13. Re:No, Caps Lock was the big mistake by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 5, Informative

    Caps lock was invented for manual typewriters.

    When you wanted to type a capital letter, the caps key would lift the platten ( the key bar had the uppercase character below the lower case character ).
    The upshot of that was that when you typed an uppercase letter, there would be a slowdown while you waited for the platen to rise.

    If you had to type several capital letters at once, it had several major effects.

    First touch typists are never supposed to use Shift, CTL or Alt. and the key on the same hand. This slows you down. Actually there were no CTL or Alt keys back then. They were eventually added to only the left side of keyboards by geeks. When IBM started creating keyboards that directly entered strokes into the computer, they added both left and right. So a sequence like "CAPSLOCK" would have the person bouncing the platten up and down. This made the persons hands more tired and the typing much slower.

    Caps lock was a solution to that.

    Of course none of that logic applies to computer keyboards.

  14. Re:Redundant keys by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Informative

    I dont think you understand how POS a POS system is.

    Sure I do - I used to build Quicken-branded, XP-based abominations for a living; "Why the fuck do they ship an LCD display that isn't compatible with the other hardware??? Yer killin' me, Smalls!"

    Most have utterly crappy touchscreens that do not support "gestures" only a single "tap event"

    Almost 90% of all the Point of sale hardware out there are steaming piles of Fecies in quality, but cost 20X the price of regular hardware.

    Agreed, but that doesn't change the fact that Windows-based touchscreen systems have had tap-and-hold-to-right-click since, like, 2003.

    Since we're talking about Windows/MS stuff here, it would be kind of assanine to assume OP was talking about a non-Windows POS.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese