Slashdot Mirror


Cricket Reactor Inventor Says $1mil Prize Winners Stole His Work

An anonymous reader writes "A group of Montreal MBA students took home this year's million-dollar Hult Prize, winning a competition for socially innovative business ideas that calls itself 'one of the planet's leading forces for good.' But now the ethics of the winners and the prize committee are being called into question. McGill PhD researcher Jakub Dzamba says that after he supplied the idea and design behind their pitch, products of years of development work, the team reneged on its promises to make him a partner and is instead taking credit for his work. Apparently, Hult knew about the issue before it awarded the prize." Yes, these are the students whose win garnered $1 million awarded by Bill Clinton.

8 of 131 comments (clear)

  1. Philosophy of selfishness = anything goes. by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a necessary consequence of embedding a philosophy of selfishness that people will ultimately bend the rules in their favour.

    An MBA school is one of the most optimised breeding grounds for this behaviour.

    1. Re:Philosophy of selfishness = anything goes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      MBA programs: making bigger assholes.

  2. Re:What did you expect? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A good MBA will not only screw you but also drill you on why you deserved that, mill you for arguing with him, and fasten the blame on someone else.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  3. Group of MBAs won a prize for innovation... by aralin · · Score: 5, Funny

    and nobody was at all suspicious? Right!

    --
    If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
  4. Re:Execution not ideas. Get it in writing. by pupsocket · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the article: "The university, after reviewing both Dzamba’s work and the McGill team’s presentation, has filed a provisional patent application declaring Dzamba as the sole inventor, says Mark Weber, a commercialization officer at McGill’s Office of Sponsored Research. Members of the Hult team did not meet the criteria for co-inventor, he said, which includes both having the idea and having the ability to execute it. Dzamba had been working on the idea as part of his doctoral research before the Hult competition began: “[Dzamba] had the idea, and he knows how to do it,” Weber says."

  5. Jakub won business plan contest a year earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Their strongest arguments against including him are based on the idea that he has developed technology but that the Hult prize was for a business plan.
    Note however that Jakub Dzamba won 3rd prize in McGill University’s Dobson Cup Business Plan Competition in 2012: Dobson Competition

    The 2013 Hult prize winners from McGill University, according to Jakub, asked him to help on their entry and offered to get him listed as a team member or make him a partner in any business they started. It sounds like Jakub gave them substantial assistance if not the impetus for their entry.

    Hult Competition is not innocent:
    According to Jakub they reneged on their promises once it became apparent that the Hult competition would not let them add a 6th member.

    University complicit:
    According to the Huffington Post article the University Administration tried to get him to sign a gag order as part of a larger agreement.
    Also note that it was at this point that: "McGill would file a pending patent for the cricket farms Dzamba designed in his name alone." which was used as an argument against him by one of the team members:
    "McGill University, which values academic integrity and owns the patent, states unequivocally that our business has zero to do with Jakub," team member Jesse Pearlstein fired back.

  6. S.O.P. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Funny

    Get a nerd to do all the work, greedheads reap all the rewards. Same stuff he'd be facing on the job market.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  7. Re:This is a problem in some academic circles by Coeurderoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The main issue is that creative people tend to be busy being creative,
    wherease non creative people have time for "politics"

    And of course there is the problem of some creative people deciding "darn it, lets creativelly fuck'em all"