Slashdot Mirror


Ex-Red Hat Employee Matthew Garrett Comments On the State of XMir

First time accepted submitter slack_justyb writes "Matthew Garrett, former employee of Red Hat, comments on the current state of XMir and Canonical's recent decision to not ship XMir as the default display server in Ubuntu 13.10. Noting the current issues outstanding in XMir, the features yet to be implemented, the security loopholes, and Intel's recent rejection to support Mir in general. All of this leading Garrett to the conclusion that 'It's clear that XMir has turned into a larger project than Canonical had originally anticipated, but that's hardly surprising.'"

51 of 88 comments (clear)

  1. Re:XMir is dead. by kthreadd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Do you know of any actual popularity statistics? Pretty much every "non-techie" Linux user I know runs Ubuntu, and quite a lot of the techies too. That's not representational of course, and some real hard numbers would be interesting.

  2. Re:XMir is dead. by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    Seconded. Even though many long-time users are switching to Mint or similar, I believe that Ubuntu still commands the lions share of the linux-on-desktop-or-laptop market.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  3. Re:Firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It boots on post-1990s hardware, so signs point to "yes".

  4. Re:Firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Do you see its name on this website ? http://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html These are the only free distros

  5. Re:XMir is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who is going to run X, Mir, Wayland, or fucking SurfaceFlinger on a web server or router? You don't run any desktop environment on those systems.

  6. Poor Mattthew Garrett by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Still suffering from the butthurt he got when Ubuntu sided with Scott James Remnant over him in a technical dispute which then led to MG quitting like a petulant little bitch. Just like what happen when he was with Debian. Now he just takes to shitting on Canonical whenever he can. The fact is, Canonical is concentrating on getting Ubuntu Touch ready and with the technical difficulties with XMir, and made the prudent decision not to dump it as a default on the Ubuntu user base.

    BTW, the while he may not work for Red Hat, he's still on the fedora advisory board. Can somebody say "conflict of interest"?

    1. Re:Poor Mattthew Garrett by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Totally agree. ...and Fedora isn't known at all for dumping not-ready-for-prime time tech on its user base.

      Next up: Lennart Poettering on his brand new X server replacement. Oh yes, its totally ready to go....

    2. Re:Poor Mattthew Garrett by segedunum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I never liked him ever since I saw the way he started outright glorifying 'Secure Boot' and how there would be no problem with Microsoft being gatekeeper.

      As for Mir, forking away is not a great thing to see but Canonical have the right to do it.

    3. Re:Poor Mattthew Garrett by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      BTW, the while he may not work for Red Hat, he's still on the fedora advisory board. Can somebody say "conflict of interest"?

      conflict of interest

      are you happy now?

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    4. Re:Poor Mattthew Garrett by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm glad we can just attack the messenger, and ignore the message.

    5. Re: Poor Mattthew Garrett by slack_justyb · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt that exchange ever got him fired for anything. He is known for being vocal about the people around him. If there was anything he was being vocal about that might have forced him to quit Red Hat, it would have been him calling Ted Ts'o a rape apologist. But the truth of the matter is that MG left of his own will to go work for Nebula to advise on their Open Stack solution.

      Now it is true that he still sits on the Fedora board, and you have a point about maybe just maybe, that influences his post a bit. That was the whole point of posting the story. Is this a case of Red Hat influence or is MG painting a pretty honest picture? I have no idea where you were going with the first paragraph of your comment and I wish it wasn't there because it diminishes the part of your comment that's got a valid argument.

    6. Re:Poor Mattthew Garrett by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Where is the "conflict of interest"? I was unaware that he had influence and stood to gain financially from XMir and a competing product. Could you point me to the links, or do you not know what the term means?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    7. Re:Poor Mattthew Garrett by mjg59 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I stopped working on Ubuntu because decisions were increasingly being made internally rather than anywhere that volunteer contributors could influence them. The "Click here to instantly break your mouse" thing was just the final straw. There's a component to the story that involves beer and a hilarious reply vs. reply all error on an iPhone, but I don't remember it being about anyone siding with Scott - there's a picture somewhere of me deactivating my Ubuntu membership a few minutes after sending https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2008-February/025141.html , which hardly gave them time to.

    8. Re:Poor Mattthew Garrett by akanouras · · Score: 1

      Garrett's blog posts are an equal split between insight-sharing and attention-whoring, yet the free software press keeps focusing on the latter.

    9. Re:Poor Mattthew Garrett by akanouras · · Score: 1

      I was referring to his moral crusades, and how they've apparently turned the public opinion a bit against him (my take on what we're seeing in the comments).

      Trust me, I'm more than glad that he keeps sharing his views on technical matters.

      Anyway, I know my post was poorly worded, however try looking at it in the GP's context.

    10. Re:Poor Mattthew Garrett by socceroos · · Score: 1

      ...the irony.

  7. Re:XMir is dead. by binarylarry · · Score: 2

    This discussion is obviously about the Linux Desktop, you fuck wit.

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  8. Re:XMir is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I find the XMir situation unfortunate. I switched to Ubuntu this past year for a clean, nice font, supported linux distro. Hopefully, this will not be the start of the end of Ubuntu.

    Yes, I could go Mint, Debian, etc... I still like the fact that there is a company behind the download - its a trust issue. I know it's all opensource so I can see the code, but let' be real, who's got the time to read each line...

    Maybe back to OpenSUSE.

  9. "Ubuntu Phone" by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    FTFA:

    Mir could have done the same, but doesn't because of a conscious design decision - in the Ubuntu Phone world, clients stop doing things when they're told to. Ubuntu Desktop is expected to behave the same way.

    So they're letting design decisions for their phone interface dictate how they implement their desktop interface. It's the same stupidity that the Gnome developers are engaged in. A desktop is not "just another kind of phone," and if you treat your primary users as second-class citizens, they'll all jump ship.

    --

    How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    1. Re:"Ubuntu Phone" by macromorgan · · Score: 1

      So they're letting design decisions for their phone interface dictate how they implement their desktop interface.

      You mean Ubuntu is about to adopt Metro?

    2. Re:"Ubuntu Phone" by div_2n · · Score: 1

      Canonical is making the gamble that the future of Linux desktop computing as a major platform, if there is one, will be in the mobile space via convergence (i.e. use your phone as a desktop on occasion by hooking it to a keyboard/mouse/monitor). If they can pull off a great phone experience that offers a compelling Android/iPhone alternative, it's a win for them. Even if not a single user decides to use it as a desktop and only as a phone, it's a win for them. It will offer Canonical a potentially sizable revenue stream they've never had before.

      That being said, their intent, as I understand it, is to make neither mobile nor desktop second class citizens -- to put them on the same level playing field. Whether they achieve this lofty goal remains to be seen.

    3. Re:"Ubuntu Phone" by krammit · · Score: 2

      This is about the behavior of the display server, not the user interface. So no, this has nothing to do with using a unified interface for different form factors.

      Deep breath. Exhale.

      You're welcome.

      --
      "Watch your cornhole, bud."
    4. Re:"Ubuntu Phone" by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1

      if you treat your primary users as second-class citizens, they'll all jump ship.

      There are more phone users than desktop users. So maybe it's worth declaring them primary.

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    5. Re:"Ubuntu Phone" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't think Ubuntu has more phone users than desktop users.

    6. Re:"Ubuntu Phone" by DrXym · · Score: 2

      I think it would be very useful if I could stuff a phone or tablet into a dock and suddenly I have a full blown desktop. I think Microsoft and Ubuntu are far better placed to deliver this than either Apple or Google are although technically there is no reason that stops any of them doing it.

    7. Re:"Ubuntu Phone" by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      This is about the behavior of the display server, not the user interface. So no, this has nothing to do with using a unified interface for different form factors.

      Hm. Let's see what Ubuntu says:

      The purpose of Mir is to enable the development of the next generation Unity. (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Mir)

      From the very beginning, Unity's concepts were tailored with a converged world in mind... (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UnityNextSpec)

      The purpose of Mir is to support their "converged interface." They are making design decisions of the display server based on the design requirements of their mobile interface, ignoring the existing desktop interface.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    8. Re:"Ubuntu Phone" by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      Mobile has a completely different IPC model that can't be supported by a 'desktop' style GUI. Specifically, you can't have applications sending each other input events willy-nilly.

      What about "I use this machine a lot while I'm not sitting down" prevents applications from sending each other input events as they choose?

    9. Re:"Ubuntu Phone" by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Windows 8 tablets running the latest Atom processors are 2-3x more more powerful than a netbook I still use for trips away. It's quite feasible to envisage a phone / tablet which makes a perfectly decent desktop for word processing, browsing the web, doing a presentation etc.

  10. Re:Uh yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Kill yourself?

  11. Re:Firmware by aesiamun · · Score: 2

    Don't you mean 'Free' not free?

  12. Re:XMir is dead. by jedidiah · · Score: 2

    Ubuntu is Steam's reference platform so that's hardly surprising.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  13. Re:Baah not this crap again by jedidiah · · Score: 2

    > I consider myself a power user and was horrified of the Dash and other things. AFter using those for awhile,

    The dash is a solution in search of a problem.

    It is something that should be an optional extra rather than the sole thing that is forced on you with older interfaces being sabotaged by unnecessary architectural decisions.

    "You will like it eventually if it's forced on you" is hardly a compelling argument.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  14. Re:XMir is dead. by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

    I think the distro to watch is PuppyOS. Talk about easy to use... and it can run on just about anything.

  15. the woes of XMir by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's still missing features

    XMir doesn't support colour profiles. XRandR properties aren't exposed, so there's no way to control TV output encoding or overscan. There's still no hardware cursor support. Switching to XMir now would reduce functionality without providing any user-visible gain.

    no hardware cursor support? talk about a dealbreaker!

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:the woes of XMir by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Whatever you guys do, don't wreak havoc on this site! The link was clearly posted with good intent. I think we can all agree that the AC did us a huge favor by polluting Slashdot, er I mean posting it to Slashdot for us.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  16. Re:Uh yeah by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    X is nice in that it is sort-of network transparent, but now that RDP can do it's magic at the application level, it's probably worth going that route. X can be very, very slow over a typical DSL or cable connection if using anything more complicated than an xterm. RDP can do a whole Windows desktop over the same connection with a lot more responsiveness. Heck, even VNC beats X on lower speed connections, but I've never seen an application-level implementation of that.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  17. Re:XMir is dead. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    I ran precisely one Ubuntu server, but they compiled Apache with some fucked up options and it would not, no matter what I did, run one of my PHP sites. In frustration, I through Debian on another machine, and it worked fine. At that point I decided never to try Ubuntu on a server again, and since then I've basically dumped it entire.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  18. Re:XMir is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Who runs an Ubuntu web server? Or router?

    The company I currently work for has several thousand servers all running Ubuntu Server, which in turn is running OpenStack and the supporting infrastructure.

    Ubuntu is what you use if you want to use Debian but need commercial support (and yes, we have made use of that support on several occasions)

  19. Re:Uh yeah by DrXym · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The same is true of VNC. Just because a machine has no display, or even display hardware doesn't mean it can't listen on a port and shove bitmaps down it.

    Of course in the case of a router, or web server, the question is why someone would want to use VNC or X to configure it. It would make more sense in either case to build a web based UI and shove all the rendering out to the client in their web browser.

  20. Re:XMir is dead. by quadrox · · Score: 2

    My webserver is currently running ubuntu (server edition without X), could someone please clarify why that makes me an idiot?

  21. Re:XMir is dead. by gfxguy · · Score: 1

    Most of the websites (and db servers) I've created for my company are Ubuntu Server... I don't deal with heavy security implications because they are all internally facing, although the ports are locked up and we haven't had any problems, and while I don't pay that much attention, I haven't heard of Ubuntu Server being any less secure than other linux distributions.

    No X Server, go gui at all, and no need for one.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  22. Re:XMir is dead. by znrt · · Score: 1

    I still like the fact that there is a company behind the download - its a trust issue

    you just blew my mind.

  23. Around and around we go by Jmac217 · · Score: 1

    We are cycling around a wheel of and racing to reinvention. All of Canonical's efforts could have been paired up with Wayland to make a one-size-fits-all display server and it probably would have been finished and ready to deploy by this point. It's opposition like Mir that is stagnating much needed innovation. I imagine Canonical's thoughts going something like "Oh, since Wayland isn't moving fast enough - even though it's been in development for years - we'll just make our own, from scratch." If they didn't think it'd cost them this much effort, then they're more arrogant than I thought. The one thing about them I've learned over the years is they love biting off more than they can chew - only to spit it right back out onto the plate. If there is one positive thing to come out of this is that it lit a fire under Wayland's butt.

  24. Re:XMir is dead. by neurovish · · Score: 1

    Many people unfortunately.

  25. Re:XMir is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In frustration, I through Debian on another machine

    I through Debian threw the window. sheesh... facepalm. Where did all you third graders come from? You THREW Debian on it, moron.

  26. Re:XMir is dead. by loufoque · · Score: 1

    A number of people also use Linux Mint and Debian, especially since 2011/2012 when Ubuntu fucked up pretty badly with Unity.

  27. Re:Baah not this crap again by bornagainpenguin · · Score: 1

    Because none of that other UI desktop stuff exists on the Ubuntu repos. Nope, not at all. You're not allowed to install them even if they do.

    You mean like Gnome 2.xx? Go ahead and try, see how far you get. Even trying to install the MATE fork results in a multitude of breakage all over the system, because of dependencies related to the increasingly ironic "Unity" desktop.

    I've been looking for a replacement to Ubuntu for a while now and have begun moving on to Debian as a result with frequent stops here and there to try out other distros to see if any come close to working as well for me as earlier versions of Ubuntu did. So far the only one which does is Debian and even then there's all sorts of stuff that I have to relearn while missing the way Ubuntu used to handle it...

    So yeah, 'forced' is an apt description. I (and many others) have been forced to make a decision between keeping our Gnome 2.xx desktop and Ubuntu. Sadly unlike those who still cling to Windows XP those of us who use Linux are unable to simply use the older versions because of how quickly bitrot sets in and how difficult it becomes to install applications.

    --
    Have a Virgin Mobile USA smartphone? Give VMRoms.com a try!
  28. Re:Uh yeah by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    Can you link me to a how-to? I have no luck just using ssh compression, I think you need something like jpeg.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  29. Surprise and antici......pation by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    It's clear that XMir has turned into a larger project than Canonical had originally anticipated, but that's hardly surprising.

    Isn't "something you didn't anticipate" almost the defintion of "a surprise"?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  30. Re:Uh yeah by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

    Try either FreeNX/NX or X2GO for the equivalent of RDP.

    --
    Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  31. Re:Uh yeah by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    FreeNX is like magic compared to ssh -C, but it's decidedly not plain old X - it's conceptually the same kind of thing as RDP, but more tailored to X directly. Still - caching and compression on a wrapper to X. I wish my admin would put it on our boxes. I stopped following NX after they went closed-source, so thanks for the link to X2GO - it looks like they carry the torch for open source NX now.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.