MAVEN Mission To Mars Will Proceed, Despite Shutdown
necro81 writes "Due to the ongoing shutdown of the U.S. Government, NASA is largely grounded. This is bad for all kinds of reasons, but one particularly bad outcome would have been missing the launch window for the MAVEN spacecraft, due to launch 18 November. The next launch window would not have been until 2016. MAVEN, thankfully, has been given the go-ahead, in large part because this orbiter will serve as a vital communications link for the Opportunity and Curiosity rovers currently on the surface. Currently, these rovers are served by two aging orbiters: Mars Odyssey (launched 2001) and Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (launched 2005). Maintaining communications with the rovers is considered essential, hence the preparations and launch will proceed. (NASA's official mission website is currently offline.)"
To quote Scotty: "You cannot change the law of physics!". It would be a sad day we would have to explain to later generations that we missed a launch window because of a childish fight of some politicians.
Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
Why are they doing all the drama? The nation has already had 17 "shutdowns," and it is just an excuse to furlough ( that is let federal employees have days off ) with pay so it is just a show to try to shame or scare the public into doing a unpleasant thing ( continue to bring on board an unpopular law, parts of which apparently the administration can arbitrarily postpone for a year, while the general population has to conform and do as it says, except for those the administration gives exemptions to including the three branches of the federal government ). The corruption is bleeding through the surface. The president is a product of the corrupt Chicago Democrat machine after all.
Ummm. I bet they have not stopped working, either.
The US could give some priorities to important stuff but right now all that matters is military spending and feeding the security scam business. The money is there, its just not spent on sane stuff.
Yeah, because a small scientific orbiter in Martian orbit would be a great way to spy on people on Earth.
-Ted http://www.freemathhelp.com/
We are sending maven to mars? Thank goodness for small mercies.
An engineer at NASA told me it's not really that great at producing something called binaries for CI, assembly:single notwithstanding. No idea what he meant, but he seemed to know what he's talking about.
I imagine the mission will come off without a hitch as long as our network connection to it remains up at all times to receive all the useful verbose reporting it gives us.
As much as they are motivated to keep on toiling.
Acquaintances of mine who are NASA employees have been told "do not use your NASA cellphone, do not use your NASA email. If you do, you will potentially be subject to disciplinary sanctions." They've also turned off all the various document servers.
The problem, from an administrative manager standpoint, is that it is illegal to work for no pay (it's related to the whole minimum wage laws thing). If you let someone work, and do not pay them on schedule, you're subject to enormous penalties, under a variety of federal and state laws.
In some states, you can be prosecuted under laws designed to prevent slavery and indentured servitude.
Now, if you had a pre-existing volunteer relationship, that's fine. But if you have been doing some kind of work, and you were being paid, and now you're doing that exact same kind of work, and not getting paid, that rings all sorts of alarms with labor laws.
And no, you cannot "donate" resources (goods and services) to the government, except in well defined circumstances. This is to prevent bribery and graft. Historically, when someone gives something, there's an expectation of a quid pro quo.
Your sarcasm is duly noted..
"File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
in large part because this orbiter will serve as a vital communications link for the US Government Spying Operations
FTFY
We're spying on Martians now? Brilliant!
Who says it's for monitoring folks on EARTH?
NSA is a proactive organization you know.. It may be a few years out, but *somebody* must be planning a trip and the NSA KNOWS about it..
"File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
Soem animal science experiemnts have been terminated this week due to lack of constant care.
Why would NASA send Maven to Mars? Are they building Java apps up there or something?
http://maven.apache.org/
Never believed NASA was a waste.... Until now...
"File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
In space no one can hear you WOOSH . . .
"Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
First Riften, now Mars. Good grief those Black Briars get around!
"They're onto us? Our plan to infiltrate the invaders' government with radical elements, shut it down for three weeks, cause economic chaos, and thereby throw the blueworlders' invasion plans off schedule by years? Dammit, who leaked? Speaker K'Breel will have the leaker's gelsacs for... well, I don't know whether it'll be for breakfast, lunch, dinner, or snacktime, let's just say it's going to involve a fork and a lot of leakage!"
Someone will roll back a requirement that's explicitly declared in the pom.xml and the operators will be forced to pore over hundreds of google entries that all say to RTFM or that you're on the wrong thread.
Just use a CVS mission to mars and call that it.
only serves no good purpose because, you yourself, are of no good.
to your self-centered teabagging rant there, son.
"the highly elliptical orbit of the spacecraft will limit its usefulness as a relay for operating landers on the surface." while the summary says "Maintaining communications with the rovers is considered essential, hence the preparations and launch will proceed. "
Shut up, Newt.
Who decides what parts of the federal state is allowed to run during shutdown? And what are the constraints on the choice?