Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Boston Dynamics Wildcat Can Gallop — No Strings Attached

Posted by timothy on from the if-you-hear-that-sound-run dept.

Boston Dynamics has been making eye-catching (and sort of creepy) military-oriented robots for several years, and we've noted several times the Big Dog utility robot. The newest creation is the untethered, gas-powered Wildcat; this is definitely not something I want chasing after me. (Not as fast as the previous, tethered version — yet.)

3 of 257 comments (clear)

  1. Government waste by sonnejw0 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why not just use a horse? Costs less, more reliable, powered by renewable resources ... the horse.

    1. Re:Government waste by alexgieg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Because billions of years of evolving something that is incredibly good at what it does isn't deemed "high tech" enough

      Evolution is slow. Evolution goes by trial and error rather than absolutely optimized engineering design and QA, and doesn't have any kind of recursive ability so as to improve its own methods. Sure, give it billions of years and the absolute minimum optimization capability and it'll make something that works pretty well, up to and including the human brain, but that's it. Now, give those human brains a solvable challenge and they'll work it out in a matter of centuries, if not decades, years or even just months.

      So, sure, right now horses are better, after all nature got a few hundred millions years advantage before allowing us to start running, but we're catching up, and fast, very, very fast. In a few decades no living thing other than human beings will have any advantage left over our technologically-developed alternatives. And then it'll come the time for technology to outgrow even that last remaining bastion of biological-over-technological superiority too.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
  2. Re:Only one purpose by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Helicopters got known as mobile weapon platforms because they were easy to hide. You fly in *under* the terrain (not subterranean, but under the peaks in that area, and possibly even below treetop level, some were known to have followed roads cut through forests), then pop up to shoot missiles, then drop below the terrain before return fire can be brought to bear.

    The problem with helicopters is that small arms can bring them down. A helicopter armored to the level of an A-10 will not get off the ground. The mule is the UGV. Deliver ordinance to a location unmanned and without human risk. As a support vehicle, they are not yet ready for prime-time.

    --
    Learn to love Alaska