Slashdot Mirror


Digital Revolution Will Kill Jobs, Inflame Social Unrest, Says Gartner

dcblogs writes "Gartner says new technologies are decreasing jobs. In the industrial revolution — and revolutions since — there was an invigoration of jobs. For instance, assembly lines for cars led to a vast infrastructure that could support mass production giving rise to everything from car dealers to road building and utility expansion into new suburban areas. But the "digital industrial revolution" is not following the same path. "What we're seeing is a decline in the overall number of people required to do a job," said Daryl Plummer, a Gartner analyst at the research firm's Symposium ITxpo. Plummer points to a company like Kodak, which once employed 130,000, versus Instagram's 13. The analyst believes social unrest movements, similar to Occupy Wall Street, will emerge again by 2014 as the job creation problem deepens." Isn't "decline in the overall number of people required to do a job" precisely what assembly lines effect, even if some job categories as a result require fewer humans? We recently posted a contrary analysis arguing that the Luddites are wrong.

8 of 754 comments (clear)

  1. Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jobs is already dead...

    1. Re:Umm... by marcello_dl · · Score: 4, Funny

      Jobs is already dead...

      AC, please, He's just living different.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  2. Re:Luddites are wrong ? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Funny

    There has never been a smooth transition. When the farms were mechanized we got major dislocations along with a vast increase in the wealth of America.

    cf. "The Guilded Age".

    http://www.austincc.edu/lpatrick/his1302/agrarian.html

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilded_Age

  3. Re:Not this shit again by Sulik · · Score: 3, Funny

    What about: -> "guy-paid-to-feed-virtual-pets-on-facebook" ? I guess that would fall in the new upcoming "Virtual Subsistence Agriculture" category

    --
    Help! I am a self-aware entity trapped in an abstract function!
  4. Re:For once, I agree with Gartner by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who needs 'post-scarcity utopia' when you can huddle behind the razor wire that surrounds your gated enclave and watch the battle between the barbarous criminal scum living in filth in the sacrifice zones and SecuriDyne kinetic pacification drones in real time, HD, 24/7 on the fear channel?

    That, my friends, is Progress(tm)

  5. Re:Wages as share of GDP dropping since 1972 by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 4, Funny

    The best part about Five Year Plans is that, like other strawman arguments, if they fail you can always make up another one.

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  6. Re:Wages as share of GDP dropping since 1972 by liamevo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sshhhh! Don't let reality affect your ideology!

  7. Re:Wages as share of GDP dropping since 1972 by P-niiice · · Score: 4, Funny

    If only there was a way for employees to band together and convince employers of the importance of these issues...