Slashdot Mirror


Billion Year Storage Media

Thorfinn.au writes "Even though the data density of digital information storage has increased tremendously over the last few decades, the data longevity is limited to only a few decades. If we want to preserve anything about the human race which can outlast the human race itself, we require a data storage medium designed to last for 1 million to 1 billion years. In this paper a medium is investigated consisting of tungsten encapsulated by silicon nitride which, according to elevated temperature tests, will last for well over the suggested time."

6 of 204 comments (clear)

  1. Nice atomic structure by nospam007 · · Score: 5, Funny

    But as we know, you can't trust atoms.
    They make up everything.

    1. Re:Nice atomic structure by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's like asking how many insane asylums are in a crazy person...

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
  2. what about the data format? by gmack · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's nice and all but can we trust our data formats to stay static for that long? Having the data but being unable to open it seems rather useless to me.

  3. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, a slashdot article with a straight-up link to the paper. No multi page article with embedded flash ads, no 'science journalism' minced down through a chain of successively dumber news outlets, no PR bullshit. Just the paper.

    Submitter, I'm impressed.

  4. Re:Data by martyros · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Most of our data are totally uninteresting pieces of garbage. Think of it, a future species recovers an archive of present tweets and facebook comments.

    Said by someone who obviously has never done much looking at history. The fact that "uninteresting pieces of garbage", that either everyone knew and assumed or thought didn't need to be said, were *not* written down, makes it a lot harder to understand the context in which the things we *do* have were said. Having a handful of people's full FB / twitter records will be a treasure trove of information for 50th-century historians trying to figure out what life was actually like in the 20th century.

    --

    TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

  5. Analog vs. Digital? by ZahrGnosis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We've been historically terrible at deciphering ancient languages without something to help link it to a current language (such as the Rosetta Stone).

    All this talk of data formats spanks of a very digital future, which I think we have a very hard time of predicting. The linked article is very binary... the grooves they explain can have "two or more" readable states, and their use of a QR code is interesting since it's an analog representation of an absurdly hard to decipher technology (without a key, as parent indicates should be the first thing). How would we encode data on these things? ASCII encoded English? Aliens would have to decode a language and then translate it. There's got to be something easier.

    At least the QR code is ultimately a 2D picture, though. I'd imagine any thorough storage over that period of time will have to start with something extremely basic. Sculptures or 2D visual instructions that clearly lay things out. I think you could probably describe a mathematical encoding mechanism visually, but a language would take some work. The Arecibo message is somewhat famous for being a digital message that is notoriously difficult to interpret, and that's by people who would actually recognize some of the glyphs. The picture attached to the 1970s Pioneer vessels is higher resolution and easier to identify, and the audio/visual nature of the Voyager Golden Record is also interesting. But still the idea that these will be intelligently deciphered by themselves is tiny.

    It's impressive that they're building something to last... they're just going to have to spend a lot of time figuring out what to put on it. Should lead to some interesting conversations.