Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Why Isn't There More Public Outrage About NSA Revelations?

Nerval's Lobster writes "This morning we discussed news that the National Security Agency (NSA) has siphoned up millions of online address books and contact lists. The Post drew its information from top-secret documents provided by government whistleblower Edward Snowden, who spent the summer feeding information about the NSA to a variety of news outlets. Snowden's documents (as outlined in The Guardian, Spiegel Online and other venues) have detailed a massive NSA program that's siphoning all sorts of personal information from a variety of sources — and yet the public seems to have greeted each new revelation with weakening outrage. Whereas the initial news reports about NSA splying in June kicked off a firestorm of controversy and discussion (aggravated by the drama of Snowden seeking asylum in pretty much any country that would have him), the unveiling of the NSA's Great Contact-List Caper has ranked below the news stories such as the government shutdown, negotiations over Iran's nuclear program, and invites for Apple's upcoming iPad event on aggregators such as Google News; it also didn't make much of a blip on Twitter and other online forums. There's the very real possibility that Americans, despite the assurances of government officials, are being monitored in a way that potentially violates their privacy. Surely that's an issue that concerns a great many individuals; and yet, as time goes by, it seems as if people are choosing to focus on other things. Are we suffering from 'surveillance fatigue?'"

41 of 610 comments (clear)

  1. Deep down.. by Daemonik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ..we've all suspected it was true a long time ago. Honestly I think the bigger surprise was that the surveillance wasn't worse. There have been people who've sworn for years that every time you lick a stamp the Post Office sequences your DNA....

    1. Re:Deep down.. by Sir_Sri · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's kind of it. We've known about secret closets in AT&T offices for ages, and we have known about NSA- microsoft cooperation for a long time. We've know since what, the 1990 that they were one of the biggest buyers of supercomputing tech etc.

      The only thing snowden has really meaningfully (meaningful to the public anyway) revealed is who exactly is in on it, and you could reasonably figure that out with the minimum of brain power before.

      Besides that, what does anyone think all this money going to agencies is for if not for spying? Particularly the NSA as a sigint organization, electronic eavesdropping is their whole reason d'etre. You may not like what they're doing, but for the amount of money they're getting I'd expect them to be trying to build the tools to wiretap everything. You may think they shouldn't be doing that - and fair enough, they probably shouldn't, but at least 10 billion dollars a year is a lot of money for an organization that specializes in spying on electronic communications and doesn't run its own submarines or human intelligence.

    2. Re:Deep down.. by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There doesn't seem to be great outrage at the possiblity of default, which could have catastrophic effects on the US economy if it resulted in the US Dollar's reserve currency status being downgraded -- if a significant proportion of those dollars currently held by other countries were sold, it would be dire. Any impact on the economy from the ACA would pale into insignificance in comparison to compromise of reserve currency status.

      So where is the outrage at the small number of Republicans who are threatening this?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:Deep down.. by afidel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The real revelation was how much of it was going on domestically, before 9/11 the NSA was basically barred from operating domestically, with the interpretation of a few provisions in the Patriot Act they went from almost no domestic footprint to dragneting most domestic communications.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:Deep down.. by samkass · · Score: 3, Insightful

      On this site a substantial number of readers use a phone whose OS is produced by a company that gets 95% of its revenue and profit from recording everything about you that it can, finding your weaknesses, and selling access to them to the highest bidder with zero oversight. Compared to that, what is the outrage over a Government agency sifting through metadata looking for people who want to hurt us and trying to stop them?

      --
      E pluribus unum
    5. Re:Deep down.. by NoKaOi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's kind of it. We've known about secret closets in AT&T offices for ages, and we have known about NSA- microsoft cooperation for a long time. We've know since what, the 1990 that they were one of the biggest buyers of supercomputing tech etc.

      So they are violating the law and the constitution, and just because we've thought it's been going on for a long time, now that we have proof we should just let it go? Here's a car analogy: You know your teenage neighbor has been joyriding in your car in the middle of the night for quite some time. Finally, another neighbor catches him on camera and gives you the proof. Do you:
      a) Figure it doesn't matter, because you know he's been doing it for quite some time anyway.
      b) Do what you need to in order to put a stop to it. If you take it to his parents, and they either outright lie about it (Clapper) or say tough cookies, it doesn't matter (Obama), then do you revert to (a) or do you escalate it?

    6. Re:Deep down.. by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...before 9/11 the NSA was basically barred from operating domestically...

      That's assuming they ever abide by any rules... I would lay odds that was never the case. Hell, the Constitution wasn't seven years old when the Aliens and Sedition Act was imposed. What have we learned? That we repeat mistakes totally unawares. Then we "unlearn" it during the next hysterical "crisis".

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    7. Re:Deep down.. by postbigbang · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People tend to be highly motivated towards new freedoms, until they gain a lot of wealth, and then that wealth must be protected. The "Give me your tired, your poor, your hungry yearning to be free" becomes islands of getting ahead, realizing the "American Dream", and wealth creation.

      Then comes the defense of wealth, as in: don't tax it and let those loafers have it. Watch out for those (commies, seditionists, traitors, and the nebulous definition of terrorists).

      We don't really repeat mistakes, as there's always been a large contingent that will protect wealth at all possible costs-- and defend their methods of creating it. I don't deny anyone a reasonable profit, but what's reasonable depends on which side of have's/have-nots you might rest on.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    8. Re:Deep down.. by icebike · · Score: 5, Insightful

      but after Al Qaeda showed everyone how infiltration can really be done,

      Except that isn't true.

      Every one of the 9/11 terrorists fit a profile that should have sounded alarm bells at the border.
      Finding guys like that is easy if you are looking and it doesn't require reading every grandmothers email, or recording
      every phone call or feeling every crotch.

      Russian operatives were far more successful, some escaping detection for multiple decades.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    9. Re:Deep down.. by Bartles · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, silly. They are just letting it go until we have a Republican in the Whitehouse to blame for it. Then the marches, protests, and front page NYTimes stories will resume.

    10. Re:Deep down.. by berashith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am afraid this is more true than we all want to believe. Everyone likes to prove their side is great by showing how shitty the other side is. Well, we now have proof that both sides are happy to screw over anyone who stands in their way, and willing to stand all over the very essence of the country to do it, and have declared themselves above the law. As the current party had a large following of voters based on hatred of the previous regime because of its transgressions against laws ( foreign and domestic), and its ignoring of human rights, there is a giant problem now that the side they supported is not only committing equivalent acts, but ignoring all pleas from the population for any kind of inclusion.

      There is no one to be angry at but ourselves, so no one is angry.

    11. Re:Deep down.. by utoddl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The lower classes (the 98%) don't care about default because they see it as comeuppance for the robber barons who have all the money to lose anyway. It's only a catastrophe for those with something to lose. For the rest, it's an inconvenient equalizer. (Actually probably much more inconvenient than equalizing; hope we don't find out.)

    12. Re:Deep down.. by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Every one of the 9/11 terrorists fit a profile that should have sounded alarm bells at the border. Finding guys like that is easy if you are looking and it doesn't require reading every grandmothers email, or recording every phone call or feeling every crotch.

      It was more than should have sounded alarms, they did get noticed, they did sound alarms. The flight school learning-to-fly but not learning-to-land was seen and not properly acted upon. Their casing the airports and dress rehearsals were observed and some even commented on them.

      Subsequent terror attacks against the US were not thwarted by high technology, even with all of the high technology and invasiveness that has followed. Those that were detected in advance were done so because someone in the public reported it, those that were tried and failed did so because of problems of the terrorists' makings, and those that succeeded (like Boston) happened in part because high technology failed to do its job and find those who would do us ill.

      High tech solutions have failed. Failed. It's a shame that the weary nature of our current culture isn't causing something more to be done about it. Halting the government because of health care that affects a fairly small portion of the populace? That's stupid compared to what we're not caring about.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    13. Re:Deep down.. by Internetuser1248 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you are all over thinking things. The answer is much more simple: The media. The modern news media are an outrage manufacturing network. When they want us to be outraged about something we are. This is the answer to all questions that start with "Why aren't the public more outraged about X". Every time I hear of some new atrocity or idiocy I wonder this for a second. Then I wonder for a second why the media doesn't cover it. But the answer to that is just as easy: there is no longer any vested interest in the news media in having a well informed public. In a system where most interactions are based on greed, there is only a vested interest in ignorance.

    14. Re:Deep down.. by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People have short memories. The "smoking gun" was that infamous memo that wasn't acted upon, that's where "national security" was compromised, it was in no way a keystone cops screw up, it was a "noob" mistake at the highest level. Yes, the buck stopped on the presidents desk but in this case it shouldn't have. It should have been promptly delegated to the appropriate TLA for further action.

      Clinton and his battle hardened adviser Clarke were fools to be obsessed by a rich, disgruntled, ex-CIA partisan called Bin-Laden, remember? That other rich, disgruntled, ex-CIA partisan, Saddam, the one who tried to kill Bush's daddy, he was the real threat, remember? Come to think of it, I take that back, it wasn't a "noob mistake", it was an extreme over-abundance of hubris on behalf of a new administration. When they fell asleep at the wheel the shit hit the fan. Their response to the splattering sound was by contrast prompt, well executed, and largely effective. After consulting a story about a goat for seven whole minutes, they turned around and shot the messengers they had foolishly ignored.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  2. we would care but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People would care but... hey! Did you hear what Miley did?

    Seriously, it's too abstract and invisible. Being online and virtual, you don't SEE that your mail was steamed open and re-sealed. You don't SEE that someone watches where you go. You don't SEE that someone is standing there listening to your phone call to your wife.

    Out of sight, out of mind.

    1. Re:we would care but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People hate being watched because they might accidentally do something embarrassing or harmful. And, people have good reason to fear potential abuses of all the monitoring...punishing them for doing perfectly legitimate things.

      Be that as it may.....the basic human reaction to being watched is to behave. There may also be reactions of rage against the watcher....but usually people just become more self-conscious and behave better.

      And....people know this intuitively.

      The argument about having nothing to hide is flawed in many ways. But it is also very intuitive and popular.

      So, I think the bottom line is....most Americans at their core don't mind being spied on. In return they get better behavior over everyone else, and know that their own behavior is good (and lost as a needle in a haystack anyway), so they just don't mind.

      And so.....the spying will continue.

    2. Re:we would care but... by jc42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously, it's too abstract and invisible. Being online and virtual, you don't SEE that your mail was steamed open and re-sealed. You don't SEE that someone watches where you go. You don't SEE that someone is standing there listening to your phone call to your wife.

      Oh, I dunno about that. I'm part of the generation who grew up watching Lily Tomlin's Ernestine, the telephone operator who has at her fingertips all of your most private information. We laughed at her. Similarly, we thought the movie The President's Analyst was funny.

      And the idea of an all-seeing, all-knowing behind-the-scenes data collector is hardly anything new to American culture. Most Americans claim to be Christians, which means that from the earliest age, they've been indoctrinated with the idea that there's an all-knowing, all-powerful being behind the entire universe that knows our every act and thought. The NSA is nowhere near this powerful (yet ;-). And, while they may be able to imprison or kill us, they can't condemn us to eternal life in a torture chamber, like the God that most of us believe in can (and does).

      The NSA are pikers in comparison with all that. They're pikers compared with Ernestine, and we thought she was funny.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    3. Re:we would care but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People aren't distracted by Miley, they are distracted by the thought that radical extremists have taken the federal government hostage and are threatening the world economy. Yes, the NSA is important, but let's keep things in perspective. The more important news at the moment is that the GOP has become an organized wrecking ball smashing as much of the federal government as it can.

  3. Outrage doesn't do shit by artor3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Slashdot is packed with mentally unstable conspiracy theorists who insist that the US is worse than Nazi Germany, Stalin's Russia, and North Korea all rolled into one. Compared to that level of white hot hatred, most Americans will seem pretty passive over the NSA thing.

    That doesn't mean they don't care though. Wait for the next campaign season, and I'll bet privacy will be a big issue. Not as big as the economy, but up there with abortion and gay marriage. A bill restraining the NSA failed by a pretty slim margin in the wake of the revelations this year. If just a dozen or so seats flip on the privacy issue, we can solve this problem.

    Or we can sit around screaming for bloody, nation-destroying revolution. I know that seems to be the popular choice on this site.

    1. Re:Outrage doesn't do shit by http · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Your nation already looks destroyed. Despite rampant criminality and indiscipline in the administration, the DoJ is deliberately remaining toothless on the matter, the judiciary is issuing no orders to rectify its oversight being ignored, and the legislators are largely following sponsor^Wparty lines instead of constituent wishes when drafting and voting on legislation. A revolution at this point could only create a nation.

      --
      If opportunity came disguised as temptation, one knock would be enough.
      3^2 * 67^1 * 977^1
    2. Re:Outrage doesn't do shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ah yes.... wait for the next election to have the same voting body that has voted in shithead after shithead to pick another bunch of shitheads and a shithead-in-cheif.
       
      What a great idea.... and people wonder why the serious problems We The People agree on just get kicked further down the road.... On to the next election, the next administration...
       
      Let's be honest, most Slashdotters put more time and thought into debating products that they claim they'll never buy (XBox, iPad and Windows 8 come to mind) than who they'll elect next time 'round. Just follow the little R and little D after the names, that's how to choose them!
       
      Slashdotters are lazy, myself included, but I'm simply someone who's not dumb enough into agreeing to the lesser of two evils bullshit that most people make up as an excuse. At least I'm not voting for the same old shitheads.

    3. Re:Outrage doesn't do shit by s.petry · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Slashdot is packed with mentally unstable conspiracy theorists who insist that the US is worse than Nazi Germany, Stalin's Russia, and North Korea all rolled into one. Compared to that level of white hot hatred, most Americans will seem pretty passive over the NSA thing.

      First, take the ad hominem and appeal to emotion and shove it right on up your a$@&*le. It works for the kids, but anyone with a basic education in rhetoric sees you for what you are.

      What you are, is a liar.

      Show me a single post where someone claims that the US is worse than any of those places mentioned, and I'll apologize. You won't find any, but hell why let facts get in the way of your delusional rant right?

      Now what you will find, is that many people warn that the acts of pre-Nazi Germany are very similar to what we are seeing in the USA.

      I am guessing that you will say "yeah, but it's all nonsense" to which I'll point out that the same people yelling about those similarities also warned you that you were going to be spied on, the courts and politicians were corrupt, and most of what you hear on "News" about the wars in the middle east was false. Since most of those warnings were correct, you are an imbecile if you somehow magically believe that US is immune to tyranny and authoritarian system. Go ahead and protest in a non-free speech zone if you think we are all "mentally unstable conspiracy theorists".

      I was going to quote and comment about the remainder of your statements, but I have a preconceived notion that it's a lost cause to comment more than I already have. Insightful my ass!

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    4. Re:Outrage doesn't do shit by NoKaOi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wait for the next campaign season, and I'll bet privacy will be a big issue.

      On the off chance that it is, the you'll just have one politician with a D next to their name saying they care about privacy and promising to fix it, and another politician with an R next to their name saying they care about privacy and promising to fix it, and whichever one gets elected will do absolutely nothing to actually fix it and everyone will forget about it. At least in that case though, it might get a few more people fired up about it for a couple of months.

      Except that's not gonna happen. The way the media has been spinning it, it's more likely that D's and R's will be promising to crack-down on potential leakers in order to overshadow what was actually being leaked. And don't pretend any 3rd party candidates will be heard by the media or have a chance of winning.

    5. Re:Outrage doesn't do shit by AlphaWoIf_HK · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That and privacy activists have been screaming bloody murder over every little thing

      What you describe as "every little thing" probably isn't so little at all. You cannot compromise on fundamental freedoms.

      --
      Da derp dee derp da teedly derpee derpee dum. Rated PG-13.
    6. Re:Outrage doesn't do shit by artor3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      See, this is the exact sort of insanity I'm talking about. Life in America is good by any sane standard. Only a literal crazy person could think that mass murder and decades of violence would be an improvement. But on Slashdot, this sort of drivel gets modded +5, Insightful.

      Is it any wonder that most Americans seem apathetic by comparison?

  4. Surveillance fatigue? by fhic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not at all. I think we've just all come to the realization that there's not a damn thing we can do about it. The people who are supposed to be looking out for us are acting like petulant teenagers. The "hope and change" guy hasn't done anything but make the problem worse. The guys in charge of the whole thing just lie about it and nothing is done. What's the answer, other than ignore the new revelations?

  5. I wonder if some americans are just too exhausted by KimiDalamori · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Speaking as one person at a full time job that regularly requires in excess of 60 hours a week, and as a friend to others who work 2 crappy minimum wage jobs at similar hours, it seems like a lot of people these days work themselves to the point where they're just too tired to rabble-rouse politically.

    --
    Lagito ergo expectabo
  6. Most people do not know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was wondering about the lack of concern and so I started asking friends and family about their views on the NSA scandal. None of my non-techie friends/family had heard of it. The local news doesn't carry it, many main stream outlets don't pay it more than a passing mention and they don't visit tech websites, so they were all in the dark about the issue. The fact of the matter is that unless you're a tech-minded person you probably either do not know about the NSA controversy or you don't understand the implications.

  7. We've been groomed for years ... by MacTO · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I suspect that the real reason why people aren't outraged is because we've been groomed to accept a lack of privacy for years. We have companies like Facebook, Google, and Twitter to thank for that.

  8. I dunno, maybe the debt default... by mellon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...has got us a wee bit distracted? I mean, the good news is that after our currency tanks, the NSA won't be able to afford their spy center in Utah and their $60 billion budget, but the bad news is that we'll all be eating grass. So it's a bit hard to get exercised over something as trivial as whether somebody in Utah is reading our email.

  9. They do worse to themselves by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously. Look at Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, etc. People are freely sharing information about themselves than the NSA is collecting. People like you are running around getting upset over some phone numbers while most people are posting pictures of themselves stupid drunk, committing crimes, and telling offensive jokes in public forums, not to mention publicly demonstrating how stupid they actually are.

    Why aren't people upset? Because what the NSA is doing doesn't even begin to compare to what people are doing on their own.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  10. GOP Shutdown confusing response by leftie · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The media is full of GOP shutdown coverage. How people break on GOP shutdown issue is almost completely different than how people break on NSA spying. The people mad about GOP shutdown don't seem to be talking about the NSA while expressing shutdown anger.

  11. Apathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Withdrawing in disgust is easily confused with apathy. It's been beaten into the American public's head that nothing they say or do will change anything - no amount of outrage changes anything. I don't know many people who thought bailing out the crooks that ruined the economy was a good idea, lots of people tried to stop it - yet it went through nonetheless. When we do speak up - such as Occupy - we get tazed, maced and worse... and still, nothing changes. Does anyone honestly think there is anything at all that will stop the NSA from doing what they're doing? Even if them doing so is akin to a big sick bird, they'll still do it - and just go back to lying to everyone who asks if they've stopped.

    It seems like it will take a total and complete collapse before we can rebuild on the ruins of this once great republic. Until that happens, I'm withdrawing in disgust and painting racing stripes on my hand-basket. Hopefully it will make the ride to hell go faster.

  12. Because it doesn't affect them by msobkow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The TV still works, the computer still works, McDonald's still serves swill, and the boss is still harping for more work to be done.

    As long as day-to-day life isn't affected, the average consumer cares far more about Miley Cyrus twerking than they do about oppressive surveillance.

    Hell, how long has the TSA been invasively harassing people for the sake of security, and they put up with that, so why not put up with something that has no obvious impact on life?

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  13. Re:Because it's overblown by Bartles · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Was it overblown when Bush was President?

  14. Re:Misdirection by Dan667 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    you do realize trying to make the story about the whistleblower is the first thing organizations like the nsa do, right?

  15. Are you kidding me?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wait for the next campaign season, and I'll bet privacy will be a big issue.

    Are you serious?!

    In 2016 we'll be back to the same old bullshit distraction issues and talking points: Gay marriage, "When does life begin? At conception?", Abortion, Spending on entitlement programs while NEVER mentioning Medicare and Social Security or Military spending, what constitutes an assault rifle and other gun control issues.

    AND ... this privacy will be spun into who is fighting terrorism the most. Watch America! This was done to keep them evil Mooslims from blowing you up! And we will have candidates falling over themselves saying how much they''ll protect us and ""if you do nothing wrong, you have nothing to worry about.""

    In a democracy, the people get the government they deserve.
    -Alexis de Tocqueville

  16. the origins of the 4th amendment by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the origins of the 4th amendment are these:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Writ_of_assistance

    a writ of assistance is just as much of an abuse as what the NSA does

    disgust with the writs of assistance was a genuine grievance and a genuine motivating factor in the founding of this country

    so conceptually, the mandate of the NSA is a direct contradiction to a foundational concept of the usa

    the difference?

    a writ of assistance involves some rude assholes barging into your life and your business and messing up your stuff

    meanwhile, what the NSA does is secret, quiet, and unseen

    the difference between something invisible and in your face is all the difference in the world, even if it is the same abuse

    but eventually, the negative effects will accumulate

    extremely vile and unpleasant abuses will occur as the power of the NSA grows. selling information about a candidate or government official for blackmail purposes for example. that judge making that important decision on that coal power plant? blackmail him. that candidate that might spring the balance of power democratic or republican? blackmail him

    with 100% certainty this abuse will happen, if it is not happening already. power and corruption and secret dealings: can't be helped, it's inevitable. only transparency prevents corruption, and the NSA is opaque by design, so corruption is a certainty

    only then will the outcry reverse these growing NSA tentacles

    the problem is, at that point, since they will know everything, will any resistance be effective enough?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  17. Too abstract, no direct harm by thoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People don't care because the actual harm is too ill-defined and nebulous for people to relate to.

    A politician that campaigns on fixing this will put 80% of the voters to sleep. A politician that promises to force cable companies to offer ala carte programming will win unanimously.

    The bottom line is that the foaming at the mouth rage this induces in... some slashdot users... barely registers as a issue at all to the vast majority.

  18. Why +5 insightful? Here's one thought .... by King_TJ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are a lot of people out there (some of my good friends included in this) who simply feel we're rapidly accelerating down a slope to a really bad place, and we've picked up too much speed to where you can say, "Oh, don't worry... We can still put on the brakes and slow this down gradually, until it comes to a peaceful stop."

    Life in America *is* good by most standards, and it's great by selected others. But that's part of the reason for the apathy. It's tough to get people too worked up about loss of individual freedoms or rights, or an eventual economic collapse when right now, they're still enjoying what's clearly a "first world existence".

    Problem is, the powers in charge know this too. As this continues, you'll see them juggle money and debt all around, doing whatever gymnastics it takes to ensure our poor still qualify for assistance programs, and to ensure everyone who serves in our military continues to get benefits and "special treatment" in various ways. They know a sure path to failure is angering the poor masses enough so they're motivated to riot, or to put a crimp in the supply of people willing to take orders to fight the "enemy" (whoever the govt. claims that happens to be at a given time), as part of the military.

    The "literal crazy person" you refer to who advocates revolution (with mass murder and a long period of violence -- though decades is perhaps questionable) is quite possibly just a "long term thinker", who unlike the majority, is willing to give up a comfortable lifestyle if it means securing 200 more years of a fair, just political system and nation for future generations.

    I'll be honest.... Despite all the problems I see looming on the horizon, I've been able to get by well enough for myself and for my family so I'm at least keeping my head barely above the waters of "middle class life". I'm not in any hurry to throw it all away for a life of hardship. But I also have a growing fear that time is running out to turn this thing around. I'm not sure my kids won't grow up cursing our whole generation, saying "Why didn't you fight this tyranny while you still could!?"

    There's that saying about the 3 boxes used to change things; the soapbox, the ballot box and the ammo box. I'm on the virtual soapbox all the time, at least online, trying to talk sense into those who will listen about where we're going wrong and where we might be able to fix it. The ballot box feels pretty ineffective to me, as of late, with the corruption rampant throughout the political system. (What good is your vote if your only selections have the same fundamental flaws?) I *really* hope we don't have to crack open that ammo box.