Slashdot Mirror


Elon Musk Making a Working Version of James Bond's Submersible Car

Nerval's Lobster writes "In The Spy Who Loved Me (1977), James Bond is given a Lotus Espirit S1 that doubles as a submarine. More than thirty years after that movie's release, a contractor opened up a random Long Island storage container to find one of the automobile-submarines used in filming. He promptly put it up for auction, and Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk purchased it for a cool $866,000. But Musk isn't planning to restore the Bond car and put it in a garage somewhere: he wants to make it run. 'It was amazing as a little kid in South Africa to watch James Bond in The Spy Who Loved Me drive his Lotus Esprit off a pier, press a button and have it transform into a submarine underwater,' Tesla PR wrote in a statement to Jalopnik. 'I was disappointed to learn that it can't actually transform. What I'm going to do is upgrade it with a Tesla electric powertrain and try to make it transform for real.' Whether that means Musk will install new equipment in the actual prop, or have his engineers build a seaworthy replica, is an open question. What's more certain is that Musk has the capability (and cash) to make something like that happen, considering how he already manages the construction of next-generation electric cars and reusable rockets for a living."

9 of 91 comments (clear)

  1. a bunch of lithium batteries in seawater ? by stooo · · Score: 5, Funny

    What could possibly go wrong ???

    --
    aaaaaaa
  2. Because he wasn't close enough to a supervillain by depressedrobot · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please be a benevolent overlord Elon.

  3. Submersible, but not dry by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That movie had a roadable version of the car and a submersible version, but not one that could do both. The submersible version wasn't dry; the operator was wearing scuba gear.

    I'm starting to worry that Elon Musk is getting spread too thin. Space-X, Tesla, Hyperloop, automatic driving, plus this. We really need for Space-X and Tesla to succeed.

    1. Re:Submersible, but not dry by Andrio · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It seems to me that this is purely just a very rich person having a fun side project. He's not planning on a fleet of submersible Tesla's or anything like that. He just wants a toy from his childhood fantasy.

      --
      The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
  4. Re:waste of money by bobbied · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let him waste his money if he wants. I agree this is a foolish idea but if that's what he wants to do for a hobby, what do I care?

    Besides, I got a feeling there will be hours of fun just watching U-Tube videos of his system tests. Wonder how many times they will have to winch the thing off the bottom before he gives up?

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  5. Love it by Kookus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's pretty difficult to keep good talent at organizations. Especially when you get into the grind of a single goal and day in and day out it's the same thing.
    Having a boss that might step in 1 day that and say hey, instead of working on that problem you've been on for a while, how about you work on making this car into a submarine. Thanks.
    That would be awesome, adds spice into the mix, and helps make people reconsider ever wanting to leave their organization.

    Hopefully that's the motivation behind this moreso than the I'm farting so much money now I can't find enough ways to spend it kind of thing!

  6. original unlikely driveable on land by SethJohnson · · Score: 3, Informative

    The original submarine that Musk bought was a lightweight shell that housed a scuba diver inside. It was not watertight. It was propelled by battery-powered propellers controlled by the diver. This is why the windows were covered with the louvers- so the audience couldn't see that James and his lady weren't just sitting inside the car breathing air.

    Musk is going to have to create an entirely separate construction if he wants something that can withstand the torque of the Tesla drivetrain and support passengers, etc. It will be easier starting with a Lotus Esprit and then making it into a watertight submersible than the other way around.

    I much rather see billionaires spend their money on pursuits like this than building superyachts to park in Monaco. Kudos to Musk!

  7. Re:waste of money by Sarten-X · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In a capitalist society, it is the excess money that should be devoted to improving society

    That's more communist, where someone who has more than he needs gives it back to help those that don't have enough.

    In a capitalist society, his excess money goes anywhere he wants to do anything he wants, and anyone who can provide what he wants gets paid for it, and can in turn spend it however they like, and so on. It will certainly take a good deal of money to turn this car into a submarine, and that means more paychecks for manufacturers and engineers on the project, who can then spend those paychecks on whatever they want, and so on.

    That is, after all, the purpose of capitalist commerce: people getting things they want.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  8. Re:Looking forward to the Tesla USB by drkim · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can you imagine the havoc it would cause when GPS directions get added for underwater routes?

    Apple Maps already has that capability.

    It wasn't supposed to have it... but it does.