Slashdot Mirror


Court Rules Probable-Cause Warrant Required For GPS Trackers

schwit1 tips this news from Wired: "An appellate court has finally supplied an answer to an open question left dangling by the Supreme Court in 2012: Do law enforcement agencies need a probable-cause warrant to affix a GPS tracker to a target's vehicle? The justices said the government's statement 'wags the dog rather vigorously,' noting that the primary reason for a search cannot be to generate evidence for law enforcement purposes. They also noted that 'Generally speaking, a warrantless search is not rendered reasonable merely because probable cause existed that would have justified the issuance of a warrant.' The justices also rejected the government's argument that obtaining a warrant would impede the ability of law enforcement to investigate crimes."

1 of 116 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Let's see if I got this by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Informative

    Law enforcement logic.

    "These guys have it coming".

    To even be in law enforcement, you have to drink vigorously from the cup of ends-justify-the-means.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)