Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Tout Electricity Storage Tech That Could Recharge Devices In Minutes

coondoggie writes "Vanderbilt University researchers say they have come up with a way to store electricity on a silicon-based supercapacitor that would let mobile phones recharge in seconds and let them continue to operate for weeks without recharging. The Vanderbilt team said they used porous silicon -- a material with a controllable and well-defined nanostructure made by electrochemically etching the surface of a silicon wafer. This let them create surfaces with optimal nanostructures for supercapacitor electrodes, but it left them with a major problem: Silicon is generally considered unsuitable for use in supercapacitors because it reacts readily with some of chemicals in the electrolytes that provide the ions that store the electrical charge, the researchers said."

31 comments

  1. Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dupe

    1. Re:Dupe by icebike · · Score: 1

      Same page dupe.
      I mean, scroll down for god sake!

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  2. Seriously, Slashdot? by axlash · · Score: 2

    Please pull this story - it has already been posted today!

    --
    Deal with reality - the world as it is - rather than ideality - the world as you would like it to be.
    1. Re:Seriously, Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Please pull this story - it has already been posted today!

      That was yesterday....

    2. Re:Seriously, Slashdot? by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Be a little patient.

      It's taking a while to teach editing to the dolphins with their new Minority Report-style interfaces.

      Also, between the data caps and the slow GPU progress, there's almost no band left. And the NSA is using most of that to monitor Chancellor Merkel's mobile phone, which, coincidentally, is powered by a silicon supercapacitor.

    3. Re:Seriously, Slashdot? by MtHuurne · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's taking a while to teach editing to the dolphins with their new Minority Report-style interfaces.

      The twin inverted post repeater (TWIPR) approach uses the same technique as dolphins do to capture page views. Like dolphins, Slashdot editors post two times in quick succession to cancel out background noise. This finding, as demonstrated by this duplicate post, explains how Slashdot editors post two times in quick succession to cancel out background noise.

    4. Re:Seriously, Slashdot? by fisted · · Score: 1

      Well jokes on them, i never read TFA anyway.

    5. Re:Seriously, Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your comment that this story is a dupe is a dupe.

  3. Duplodocus by Art3x · · Score: 4, Funny
  4. Researchers Tout Rapid Dup Technology by Tailhook · · Score: 5, Funny

    Minimizes intervals between duplicate stories to only 6.5 hours.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    1. Re:Researchers Tout Rapid Dup Technology by Thanshin · · Score: 2

      Yeah. You laugh now, but one day they'll manage to reduce the interval to minus 6.5h and publish the dup hours before the fact has even happened.

      (btw: That's what we need from Minority Report; not the HUD)

    2. Re:Researchers Tout Rapid Dup Technology by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      No, they built a new prototype. The old one burned down because the battery researchers didn't realize that the charging cable wasn't superconductive.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  5. Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My phone can already charge in (~10000) seconds and last for (.25) weeks.

  6. Editors clearly don't read slashdot themselves by CoolGopher · · Score: 1

    It's only six stories down for heaven's sake! Note: this post is likely a dupe too, in order to keep in character with the site.

    1. Re:Editors clearly don't read slashdot themselves by grouchomarxist · · Score: 1

      If they don't read the slashdot stories, then they don't read the posts either. We're doomed.

    2. Re:Editors clearly don't read slashdot themselves by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Posting the same story twice in quick succession helps to minimise interference.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  7. Again! by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    It rubs the lotion on its skin, or else it gets the story again!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Again! by nightsky30 · · Score: 1

      It rubs the lotion on its skin, or else it gets the story again!

      It store electricity on a silicon-based supercapacitor...
      *CRIES OF DESPERATION*...
      It store electricity on a silicon-based supercapacitor...
      *CRIES OF DESPERATION*...
      PUT THE FUCKING ELECTRICITY ON A SILICON-BASED SUPERCAPACITOR!!!!!
      *HORRIBLE, HORRIBLE SCREAMS AS THE VICTIM REALIZES THIS HAS ALL HAPPENED BEFORE...*

  8. Egyptions, Tesla had this technology, that means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We will never get a free piece of it

    Governements will, just not us.

  9. Second Post! by MonkeyDancer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Second Post!

  10. Electrolytes by some+old+guy · · Score: 1

    Brawndo! It's got electrolytes.

    --
    Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.
    1. Re:Electrolytes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh, stupid! That's what plants crave. You can't charge your phone on plantwater! That'd be like stupid!
      Like, putting your phone in plantwater makes the phone go warm and black!

  11. Dejadup by msobkow · · Score: 1

    'nuff said

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  12. I return to /. after many years of absence... by _14k4 · · Score: 2

    To find, first thing on the front page - a nice nifty dup. Glad to see nothing has changed. ;)

  13. Weeks without charging? I'd be happy with days by youn · · Score: 1

    but maybe I am the only one... I must be plugging my phone wrong

    --
    Never antropomorphize computers, they do not like that :p
  14. Re:Egyptions, Tesla had this technology, that mean by Guignol · · Score: 1

    Are you talking about electrically charged egyptians ?

  15. Energy density and safety ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So will you be holding a bomb upto your head (weeks of charge ???)

    Or is a nother one of those 'theoretical things' as likely as a Mr Fusion unit for your cellphone (probably thats the safer option...)

    Dificulty fabricating them successfully ??? assembing them (layers of good ones...) extra redundant layer to allow for defects etc...

    How about just a days charge first ( with a smaller 'battery' size)

    Low voltage equals high current for 'fast' charging - so will the usual charge sources work any more ? Oversize components which will offset other savings ???

    Theory and Consumer goods dont always intersect.

  16. Nope. by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

    Here's a hint. Any time you see a press release from a company or University PR department, ignore it. It's usually much worse than no information at all.

    In this case they MAY have figured out how to lay down a supercapacitor on the back side of a silicon chip. Big whoop. You're talking about a few Farads at a few volts at most. Not a lot of energy storage possible there, certainly not enough to run a cell phone for more than a few seconds.

  17. Story is BS - and so is the dupe by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

    Clicked to the linked article, clicked from there to the original paper.

    Figure 4 clearly shows a peak energy density of about 5 Wh/kg. Existing production super caps are about 5 Wh/kg (see Maxwell or Wiki for many examples), so the "significant" improvements being claimed are not in the data.

    Claims in the original article, copied here without examination, include making cell phones last for weeks. Li-ion batteries in cell phones have about 210 Wh/kg, so if your phone lasts you a day now, using this tech would make that 1/2 hour.

    Total BS.

  18. Really wish people would stop overselling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I highly recommend people to read an article such as the below from the American Chemical Society (the leading professional organisation for Chemists, Chemical Engineers, etc.):
    http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/cr020730k

    Before they start posting about capacitors.

    The great strength of capacitors is also its great weakness. It charges quickly... it discharges quickly. Other than some applications in where rapid energy discharge and recovery is possible, it really doesn't offer the same level of application that conventional batteries and fuel cells offer.

  19. iGrenade by 12WTF$ · · Score: 1

    Great :(

    The next advancement from a phone that catch on fire from overheating Lithium battery,
    is a phone, with super duper silicon caps, that will experience uncontrolled disassembly.

    IN.YOUR.POCKET

    --
    Cryonics - Keep cool and carry on.