Slashdot Mirror


NSA Chief Keith Alexander Takes His PRISM Pitch To YouTube

Daniel_Stuckey writes "There's definitely something strange about the video's attempt at looking/sounding like a NOVA episode. Alexander, who defended the agency at Black Hat this summer and recently announced his retirement next year, takes care to emphasize the agency's privacy compliance precautions and oversight. 'We have not had any willful or knowing violations in those programs,' he says referring to sections 215 and 702 of the Patriot Act, which relate to the telephone metadata and PRISM programs respectively. 'There have been [violations] in other programs, but not in those two.'"

25 of 165 comments (clear)

  1. Have they not worked it out yet? by Afty0r · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All the lies and deceit that has come along from them so far means that WE. DO. NOT. TRUST. WHAT. YOU. SAY.

    Your words are pointless, because you are almost certainly lying. "How do you know when an NSA spokesman is lying?" "His lips are moving"

    1. Re:Have they not worked it out yet? by houghi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't you get it? If they say it often enough, people will start believing it. All they need is enough people who believe it.
      It works for companies with advertising. It will work for them as well.

      This is your new and improved Freedom. Better then the old one.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:Have they not worked it out yet? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apparently, those were associated with a different program... How many different programs are there? That's a state secret, citizen! Are 'violations that even our internal affairs flunkies can't pretend away automatically re-classified as part of PROJECT BAD-EGG, which is the only program with any history of violations? Gosh no! Could we just classify each distinct login by every single analyst as a 'program' in order to say that we have a 100% record on shutting down programs with violations associated? Well, it's a big namespace, so why not?

    3. Re:Have they not worked it out yet? by sI4shd0rk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In effect, you've given them every incentive to not change at all.

      No. I think people just want them to do more than just talk. I think people want them to stop what they're doing.

      --
      Ignorance is a choice
  2. Willful or knowing violations by erikkemperman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, just involuntary and ignorant violations, then.

    --
    Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    1. Re:Willful or knowing violations by AftanGustur · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So, just involuntary and ignorant violations, then.

      I see what you did here and more people should be doing this, listen to what words he uses and then think, "why is he using these words and could he be trying to sidestep the truth with the use of selected words."

      Because that's that he is doing!

      --
      echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
  3. He lied ... by PPH · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... to Congress. Why is he not in prison?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:He lied ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The DOJ is responsible for enforcement of that in Washington DC. Eric Holder, who has also recently lied to Congress, has informed the DC police to not prosecute just as he told them not to do the same to him before.

    2. Re:He lied ... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      . . . because the NSA has collected enough poop on every member of Congress and blackmailed them. J. Edgar Hoover did this back in his days, as well.

      Congress is afraid of the NSA.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:He lied ... by Nyder · · Score: 3, Informative

      ... to Congress. Why is he not in prison?

      Because whistle blowers get put in prison these days.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    4. Re:He lied ... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Informative

      He lied to Congress

      It was Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper who lied to congress, not Alexander. At least not provably.

      It is important that we keep the facts straight, every stray bullet is an excuse for the pro-NSA types to discredit our position.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    5. Re:He lied ... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You poor, clueless fool. A Constitutional Congress is the LAST THING we need right now. If one were convened, who in HELL do you think will actually sit at the table, to author the freaking documents? Do you really want representatives of RIAA to help author, then vote, on a new constitution? Think - that's what God gave you all that gray matter inside your skull for.

      What we NEED, is to get rid of all those judges who believe the Constitution to be a "living document". We NEED a lot more real conservatives in judge positions. And, by "conservative", I certainly DO NOT MEAN neoconservatives, corporate lobbyists, or representatives of the military industrial complex. I mean, real, actual conservatives. There are so few of them left today.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  4. Assertion without evidence - dismiss without it by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's nice that you say so. The problem is: I don't believe you. I cannot. There is no oversight whatsoever concerning your actions. You say that no transgressions happen, that's nice. But let's say I assert that I'm no terrorist, does that mean you stop spying on me? No. Why? Because you cannot verify that I'm not.

    So why the hell should I believe you without any kind of evidence or any kind of ability to verify your claims?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Assertion without evidence - dismiss without it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Don't forget that they've been hard at work redefining everything from "what torture is" to "what does or does not count as a violation of the law".

      You're not violating anything if you've forced people to rewrite the rules for you.

      Except people, but it's quite obvious they've never cared about those.

    2. Re:Assertion without evidence - dismiss without it by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3

      If twenty million of us give government a dollar each to build a road, a road will be built. The value of the road will be about six million, and the remaining fourteen million will be used to attack little brown men on camels with drones.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  5. Should DoD be propagandizing directly to public? by guanxi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Doesn't this amount to the Department of the Defense propagandizing directly to the U.S. public? What is acceptable and what is not?

    I can see press conferences, announcements, and factual information, but when does it become an attempt to persuade the public?

  6. It will take more than that.. by Rigel47 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Secret program approved by secret courts run by a guy who has no qualms about lying under oath. Sorry but your credibility will only return once you get rid of FISA courts and replace yourself with someone who doesn't consider people who disagree with mass surveillance as being filthy, disobedient children. Massive ass that you are. And yes, he did make that comparison.

  7. The entire program is a violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How about that for starters? It's about time to end martial law after 9/11!

    The patriot act is about as patriotic as the Federal reserve is federal...

  8. He's being tossed to the wolves by hazeii · · Score: 4, Informative

    Outlived his usefulness, and being allowed to hang himself in the court of public opinion.

    Check the like vs dislike counts on youtube (157 vs 9,993 at the time of writing).

    --
    All your ghosts are just false positives.
  9. Re:Much ado about nothing by sI4shd0rk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People are wringing their hands over an automated system that might see your super secret facebook Like of the latest Lil Bub video

    Yeah! Who cares if they spy on everyone and blatantly violate the constitution? No big deal. No government has ever abused their powers or used information to their advantage. Also, laws are unchanging and always just, so what could possibly go wrong?

    --
    Ignorance is a choice
  10. Re:Should DoD be propagandizing directly to public by whoever57 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Didn't you notice that he'd retired?

    I did not notice this, for the simple reason that it hasn't happened. He has announced his intention to retire next year.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  11. Re:Much ado about nothing by sumdumass · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Umm... That is sort of the American left's mantra. The Constitution is a living document which meaning changes as society changes and holding it to strict interpretation is obsolete. Why would you think they would be concerned with protecting it or it's enforcement or the ramifications of it?

    That is something the American right and/or people who actually give a fuck about this country simply do not understand. Hell, even many on the left who do care don't understand it but follow that ideology to some degree because it is convenient to their other goals. There are entities who care fuck all about the constitution, what limits it places on the government's abilities (unless they conveniently need them at the moment), as long as their version of whatever makes it through. Expecting them to care is simply foolish.

    Seriously, we just had a law passed (PPACA) that couldn't survive on it's own merits constitutionally and the Supreme Court had to rewrite a penalty provision to become a tax penalty that completely bypasses the 5th amendment's due process of law clause in order to force it into compliance with the Constitution and the American Left are championing it as a great victory over the mean terrorist republicans. Despite 16 million people with insurance loosing that coverage due to the strict grandfather clause in the law, Despite massive increases in premiums for those who get to keep their insurance, despite companies dropping employee hours to avoid full time employees, despite companies dumping retirement coverage onto medicare and the exchanges, despite companies dumping spousal coverage if they work because they can get insurance elsewhere now, we have an administration that rewards it's political allies by giving unions and large companies waivers and delays but will not delay the mandate for the common man even though the exchanges are completely messed up right now. And you expect them to understand or care about anything other then their agenda.

    Now stop bothering me, I gotta find out what Brittany is doing next.

  12. They are preaching to the sheeples ... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All the lies and deceit that has come along from them so far means that WE. DO. NOT. TRUST. WHAT. YOU. SAY.

    Don't you get it yet ?

    They are using Youtube, a place where the sheeples congregate

    They are NOT talking to the people like you and me --- they are talking AT the sheeples

    As long as the sheeples in America ( and the world ) believe their lies, and the sheeples do believe them, NSA will get to continue their deceits without any hindrance

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  13. I've worked it out... by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What makes you so sure?

    That they are STILL trying to hide something BIG? Years in the telecom and ISP business, NSA-watching since the Internet went global and way before. I am one of those people who might have become a spook, though I am glad I did not. From its all-to-brief brief mention in David Kahn's The Codebreakers [1967] which I carried around as a kid like some overstuffed bible, my interest was piqued by James Bamford's Puzzle Palace [1982] which introduced the world to the topic of the 'piggyback slurp' and laid out directly NSA's intentions to tap the world. The whole world -- Charter be damned -- from the start.

    A few anecdotes from good friends in the telecommunications trade who alluded to special cordoned-off spaces within AT&T's Magens Point cable terminus in St. Thomas US Virgin Islands, drunken conversation in bars with reminders not to speak of such things... a rather suspicious 'underwater landslide' fiber outage between St. Thomas and Puerto Rico c.1995, which I suspected at the time might involve a submarine because a telco friend noticed that after all his voice circuits were back there was an eyebrow-raising 'unusually long period' before the data circuits came up, even though they were physically interspersed and not supposed to be broken out at the carrier level... circumstantial stuff, sure. Pure speculation is as fascinating as the real thing.

    Since then, revelations about Room 614A and Hepting vs. AT&T, the little mouse who could have roared all the way to the Supreme Court, had they not declined to hear the case.

    I'm not talking about individual stakeouts or FISA warrants or occasional 'oopsies' of a few domestic intercepts. I'm discussing large scale Tier 1 total interception of data with selective routing and forwarding of target traffic onto side channels via 'dark' or leased fiber on a scale that is approaching 'total'. This includes voice too: terrestrially trunked cell calls and landline (there is practically no difference these days, it's all turkeyfart compressed).

    Which is why I posted here back in June my theory that PRISM slides were made as part of a limited hang-out. I came to this conclusion because I found the allegation that Internet service providers named grant direct back-doors to NSA to be preposterous (and still do, too much risk of exposure by now). The purpose of the hang-out was for Google and company to discredit the allegations honesty to relegate it to 'hoax' status... and provide a topic that diverts attention away from the total-tap-slurp operation.

    Steve Gibson of Gibson Research has come up with another theory that I find interesting, it may fit Occam's Razor better than my own. He presented it recently in Security Now #408: The State of Surveillance, audio and full transcript available. GOOD STUFF. His angle is that "direct access to their servers" means all unencrypted SMTP-mail and HTTP from tap points directly upstream. It is all about fiber and taps. Taps are about splitting light... and that is what prisms do.

    If you have a good traffic tap and encrypted intercepts, add a bit of coercion for the providers to divulge their private SSL keys and they can replay the past SSL sessions they have gathered.

    It is time for everyone to learn about and implement Perfect Forward Secrecy.

    Thar be dragins in our midst. Slay them.
    NSA and the Desolation of Smaug

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  14. Threat narrative? Yeah, fuck right off. by VortexCortex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just a reminder: Heart Disease and Accidents cause more deaths every single year than over four hundred 9/11's. It's been over a decade now... That's more than 4000 September 11th sized attacks. Are you scared to eat and/or drive now? That's how fucking pathetic the fear narrative is.

    This is America. We drive fast cars to fast food restaurants without a second thought. You want me to continue to ALLOW an expensive totalitarian spying apparatus to protect us from 0.00025 the danger we face from cars and cheeseburgers? What the fuck can the ineffectual terrorists do? If the NSA wanted to protect us they'd be making tastier health food and building self driving cars or the Hyper-Loop.

    Fucking "intelligence" bullshit; Protip: All government labels mean the opposite. "PATRIOT Act", yeaaah. "Intelligence?" hahah... oh man. No wonder the basement dwelling NSA stinks so bad. If they're afraid of terrorists, just imagine how they feel about the many times greater threat of falling down in the bathtub!