Is Europa Too Prickly To Land On?
astroengine writes "A deadly bed of icy javelins — known as penitentes — could be awaiting any spacecraft that tries to land on some parts of the ice-covered world Europa, say researchers who have carefully modeled the ice processes at work on parts of the Jovian moon to detect features beyond the current low resolution images. If the prediction of long vertical blades of ice is correct, it will not only help engineers design a lander to tame or avoid the sabers, but also help explain a couple of nagging mysteries about the strange moon. 'This is a game changer,' said planetary scientist Don Blankenship of the University of Texas in Austin. Blankenship has been involved in NASA's planning process for sending a reconnaissance spacecraft and eventually a lander to Europa."
What part of "Attempt no landing there" don't you people understand?
I am officially gone from
"All these worlds are yours, except Europa. Attempt no landing there. Use them together. Use them in peace."
They solved breaking up ice years ago. Send the titanic.
Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
.
I, for one, suggest a low altitude detonation of a low-yield thermo-nuclear device at any potential landing sites prior to the landing attempt.
This should glass over the LZ and let any locals know that papa's coming home and he's pissed.
.
"A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
GeneralEmergency
as just mean spirited, bureaucratic and bad tempered. Why else would we have been warned against landing?
Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
I now expect at least Samzenpus (if not every Slashdot editor) to turn in their geek card, in addition to the submitter being banned from all further Slashdot submissions. How on earth (or in space) do you make a reference to landing (or not) on Europa and NOT put in a Clarke reference? What kind of geek are these people?
Just drop a M-121 bomb on the LZ to clear things out before landing.
Take that spacecommies!
America, FUCK YEAH!
the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
And I don't want to tell them how to do their job, but has anyone considered making their space ship out of some sort of "metal"? And maybe put a thing on the bottom that shoots fire out of it?
I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?
I put ice javelins in my blender, add some fruit and there you go, a smoothie. So just mount some BlendTec blenders on the bottom of the spacecraft and see if it "will blend". Would be some nice advertisements.
Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
I'm not surprised Europa is a bit prickly at the moment.
How about making the bottom of the craft an inverted cone? Then it can settle nicely in between the spikes.
"Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Think Europa is prickly? Unless it's freshly shaven, how about Uranus? *badum tish* (gets his coat)
I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
Well, as the third or forth mention of the same joke in the first couple of minutes I think that Redundant was rather just.
"Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
Just saying...
High latitude landings are energetically more demanding. Eats into your payload allowance, which means fewer instruments, which makes it harder to justify your mission against another Mars mission (for example.)
Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.