Slashdot Mirror


Cable Lobbyist Tom Wheeler Confirmed As New FCC Chief

An anonymous reader writes "The U.S. Senate confirmed Tuesday the nomination of a new chairman to the Federal Communications Commission. Wheeler is a former investor and head of telecommunications industry groups. President Barack Obama said, when announcing Wheeler as his choice in May, that 'for more than 30 years, Tom has been at the forefront of some of the very dramatic changes that we've seen in the way we communicate and how we live our lives.'"

49 of 242 comments (clear)

  1. thank you sir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    may i have another?

    1. Re:thank you sir by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, your next one will be delivered sometime between 2-8PM next Wednesday, please be at your house that entire time.

  2. Dare to Hope by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dare to Hope; Prepare to be Disappointed.

    1. Re:Dare to Hope by Thanshin · · Score: 2

      Dare to be cynical; prepare for pleasant surprises.

    2. Re:Dare to Hope by sconeu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dare to be cynical; prepare to get exactly what you expected.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Dare to Hope by zidium · · Score: 2

      What pleasant surprises have you gotten during Obama's administration? Or heck, even Bush's?!

      There. That's an almost-14 year period to choose from. List!

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    4. Re:Dare to Hope by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

      No third world war.

      I think your problem is that you didn't dare to be cynical enough.

    5. Re:Dare to Hope by ApplePy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hey now... we were promised transparency by the Precedent, and we got it! All the corruption is completely out in the open now!

      --
      That I'm right, and you don't like it, doesn't mean I'm a troll.
    6. Re:Dare to Hope by Megane · · Score: 2

      Huh? But we've had plenty of war in the third world! Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria...

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    7. Re:Dare to Hope by Thanshin · · Score: 2

      Are you being cynical about the miserably positive result of "no world war"?

      That's the spirit!

      I see lots of pleasant surprises in your future!

      May you be able to see the cynical twist in all of them.

    8. Re:Dare to Hope by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      I think you're onto something there actually. After the NSA revelations and too big to fail, the government may have realized "Hey, these morons literally do not care what we do, why hide it?"

      At what point does it stop being corruption and start being "Stupid shit that we let happen?" I mean, if someone says "I'm going to drive off in your car and not give it back, that cool?" and you're like "Meh," that's not really stealing your car. If Obama says "I'm going to let these industries make their own rules," and we say "Oh, well they have experience, so I guess that makes sense," that's probably not something you could quite call corruption.

  3. Re:Good luck seeing a la carte anytime soon. by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you like your cable plan, you can keep your cable plan.

  4. Regulatory capture by symbolset · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wikipedia:

    Regulatory capture occurs when a regulatory agency, created to act in the public interest, instead advances the commercial or special concerns of interest groups that dominate the industry or sector it is charged with regulating. Regulatory capture is a form of government failure, as it can act as an encouragement for firms to produce negative externalities. The agencies are called "captured agencies".

    Federal Communications Commission

    Legal scholars have pointed to the possibility that federal agencies such as the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) had been captured by media conglomerates. Peter Schuck of Yale Law School has argued that the FCC is subject to capture by the media industries' leaders and therefore reinforce the operation of corporate cartels in a form of "corporate socialism" that serves to "regressively tax consumers, impoverish small firms, inhibit new entry, stifle innovation, and diminish consumer choice". The FCC selectively granted communications licenses to some radio and television stations in a process that excludes other citizens and little stations from having access to the public.

    Michael K. Powell, who served on the FCC for eight years and was chairman for four, was appointed president and chief executive officer of the National Cable & Telecommunications Association, a lobby group. As of April 25, 2011, he will be the chief lobbyist and the industry's liaison with Congress, the White House, the FCC and other federal agencies. Meredith Attwell Baker was one of the FCC commissioners who approved a controversial merger between NBC Universal and Comcast. Four months later, she announced her resignation from the FCC to join Comcast's Washington, D.C. lobbying office. Legally, she is prevented from lobbying anyone at the FCC for two years and an agreement made by Comcast with the FCC as a condition of approving the merger will ban her from lobbying any executive branch agency for life. Nonetheless, Craig Aaron, of Free Press, who opposed the merger, complained that "the complete capture of government by industry barely raises any eyebrows" and said public policy would continue to suffer from the "continuously revolving door at the FCC".

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Regulatory capture by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is why a lot of people say it's better to do government operations as close to the people as possible. That is, if it can be done at a city level, do it at a city level. If it can be done at a state level, do it at a state level. Only a few things should be done at the national level.

      The farther things get from the people, the easier it is for them to be corrupted (or rather, if some town gets corrupted, it doesn't affect people outside that town).

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Regulatory capture by P-niiice · · Score: 2

      You'd have a better chance doing it centrally. Problem is, this central agency is already bought and paid for.

    3. Re:Regulatory capture by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "Regulatory capture", what a nice sounding name for Graft: ", a form of political corruption, is the unscrupulous use of a politician's authority for personal gain."

      I guess that is what you have to call corruption and graft now it is so common/the norm amongst our ruling elites. Brings new meaning to the phrase "politically correct"...

    4. Re:Regulatory capture by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Please re-read the last sentence

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:Regulatory capture by khallow · · Score: 2

      And you think regulating radio interference could be done at a state level without massive consequences?

      I can't speak for the earlier poster, but standards could be set at the federal level and regulated at state level. So yes, I do think that could be done.

      I don't see a lot of issues from the current approach aside from regulation of rather pointless things like naughty words and the aforementioned regulatory capture.

    6. Re:Regulatory capture by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Problem is, this central agency is already bought and paid for.

      At risk of pointing out the obvious, that's a good part of why you don't have a chance of doing it centrally.

      You think it sounds easier centrally, because you think, "If I were in charge, we could........." but you are not in charge, and good luck getting a non-corrupt person in charge and keeping him there. Do you REALLY think you have a chance of getting a less-corrupt president than Obama in the next election?

      However, if your goal is to get a less-corrupt mayor......that is a lot more achievable for someone like you.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re:Regulatory capture by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      The FCC we have now isn't very good, so I'm open to exploring alternatives.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Regulatory capture by n1ywb · · Score: 3, Informative

      Frequency coordination is already done at the state level to a certain degree. Vermont Public Radio, for example, hired a guy and bought expensive software to perform propagation prediction so they could buy up as many frequencies as possible for low power translaters beating out the other stations (of which there aren't very many this being Vermont).

      A close associate of mine is the amateur radio frequency coordinator for the state of Vermont. He's responsible for coordinating repeater frequencies in conjuction with his counterparts in other states (and Candada) as necessary.

      In general all licensed radio users are required to meet certain requirements WRT not interfering with other licensed users so while they fight over bandwidth there is also necessarily some cooperation, especially on the local level, b/c most frequencies above 30mhz do not typically propagate very far (except during solar cycle maximae, like we're in now; 10m is open!)

      None of this really has anything to do with the fact that an industry shill is sitting in "the big chair".

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
    9. Re:Regulatory capture by spiffmastercow · · Score: 2

      Because states *love* implementing federal standards, as the Obamacare rollout clearly shows.

      And if that aspect of Obamacare hadn't been found unconstitutional, those states would be implementing that particular "standard" at considerable expense. But OTOH implementing standards for radio frequency use is a valid exercise of the Commerce clause and thus it doesn't matter if those states like it or not.

      What "aspect" are you talking about? IIRC it's always been a carrot on the stick thing for implementing, otherwise the feds would do it for them. They didn't *have* to implement the standards, and therefore most of them refused, even though the states that did implement their own exchanges fared far better than those that didn't. Abortion is another example. According to SCOTUS it's protected by the constitution. How are those southern states doing in regard to protecting that constitutional right? Or how well do you think New York will do in protecting gun rights if they didn't have to? The point here is that states will pick and choose what they want to implement if given the option.

    10. Re:Regulatory capture by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      What alternatives have you proposed. You just kinda said "smaller government" then pretended that was enough. It's a lame excuse for an argument.

    11. Re:Regulatory capture by triffid_98 · · Score: 2

      This, this a thousand times this.

      when I hear about the FCC this makes me sad.
      when I hear about the SEC this makes me mad.


      Lobbyists and former industry executives have no business working for either agency, let alone using the Revolving Door over and over again, swapping between jobs as a regulator and jobs as a lobbyist/executive in the companies they supposedly regulate.

  5. Very dramatic changes by chromas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tom has been at the forefront of some of the very dramatic changes that we've seen in the way we communicate and how we live our lives

    Changes? Like putting speed bumps on the highway?

  6. Like Wile E Coyote named head of Roadrunner rescue by JoeyRox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know a government is corrupt when they don't even bother to hide it anymore.

  7. Hope and change! by cogeek · · Score: 2

    At least we won't have to worry about any more lobbyists in Washington under this administration.

  8. Re:Good luck seeing a la carte anytime soon. by jamstar7 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Strange, I just got a letter from my provider saying my current plan doesn't meet Federal minimum requirements and they can't legally offer it anymore...

    --
    Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  9. It all makes perfect sense! by fredrated · · Score: 2

    Next up, we put bank robbers in charge of bank security, because who has more experience with bank security than bank robbers?

    1. Re:It all makes perfect sense! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The biggest bank robbers are the C?O executives, and they are in charge of bank security.

  10. Fox elected to guard henhouse, news at 11 (on Fox) by korbulon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All these revelations and new about the fcc, nsa, tsa, etc etc all serve to hammer home the same point: rules are for suckers, rules are for idiots, rules are for everyone else.

    As you as you reach a certain level of power, you ascend into a special clique where the only rules that matter are those that pertain to that clique. So break and bend the laws of the land, yes fine, but heaven help you if you transgress the pre-existing power matrix, that you commit some unforgivable faux pas at the dinner party, because then fuck you.

    I know all this - I've known it for years: the world is a dirty place filled with filthy, corrupt, disgusting characters where morals and regulations and laws are put in place largely to maintain order, not justice. And yet stories like this still never fail to fill me with an indescribable loathing.

  11. Re:Good luck seeing a la carte anytime soon. by Rockoon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just got a letter saying that I have to pay a fee for not subscribing to a cable television plan...

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  12. Re:from TFA by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not a fan of Cruz, but he was the only one to show any concern that this appointee might use his power for political purposes. Considering the choice, its not a stretch, whether you agree with his position or not. And to be fair, Neither Obama or any other senator, Democratic or Republican "had any problems with this cable industry lobbyist guy being appointed head of the FCC" either.

  13. Re:Like Wile E Coyote named head of Roadrunner res by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First I laughed. Then I cried when I realized this wasn't a joke but reality.

  14. Re:Good luck seeing a la carte anytime soon. by lgw · · Score: 5, Funny

    Every time you say you don't believe the fine is really a tax, a fairy dies.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  15. This can't possibly be an accurate report. by Seumas · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm sorry, but I don't believe this whatsoever. I distinctly remember our president campaigning on an end to the revolving door of industry lobbyists and executives to head political positions and vice versa.

    A little googling later . . . : https://www.opensecrets.org/obama/rev.php

    Oh. Well, then. . .

    1. Re:This can't possibly be an accurate report. by GlennC · · Score: 2

      He did remove the revolving door....

      and replaced it with an automatic sliding one.

      Revolving doors are so 20th Century!

      --
      Go on, citizen, stamp the vote card. R or D, your choice.
    2. Re:This can't possibly be an accurate report. by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 2

      But it makes that cool Star Trek noise when it opens...

  16. Did he get a waiver to serve? by MobyDisk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Obama said that he would not allow lobbyists to server in government posts, but he put in a waiver procedure that permits it. Did this person go through that waiver procedure?
    FYI: Politifact information about the lobbyist promise. There haven't been any updates there regarding this position.

  17. Thud! by some+old+guy · · Score: 5, Funny

    The sound of the Last Obama Fan On Slashdot's forehead hitting the desk.

    --
    Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.
    1. Re:Thud! by sideslash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A lot of people will be mad at me for saying this, but President Obama has gotten a free pass for lots of bad stuff because of his race. If a white Republican congressperson started a movement to impeach him for (just to pick an easy example) waging war in Libya without congressional authorization, they would be called racist faster than you can say the words "colorblind society".

    2. Re:Thud! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The previous 43 white presidents got a free pass for all the same stuff. Quite a few of those (just to pick your example) waged war without congressional authorization as well, and they were not impeached.

  18. Another lobbyist? by Biosci777 · · Score: 5, Informative
    This president promised he would boot the lobbyists; that they would not have access to his administration. The FCC appointment is only the latest evidence that that promise is broken. Conor McGrath wrote in the Journal of Public Affairs in September that Obama employs 119 (make that 120 now) former lobbyists.

    Wow. If I fall off the wagon and break my promise, I'm like any other human. But when I do it over and over again with no sign of regret or shame, that's different. That's a matter of character, and you would be right to be slow to trust me in other areas.

  19. A new clause needed for "public service" by oDDmON+oUT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Institute something modeled after the standard non-compete clause used by industry; except it would prevent any individual from holding a government position which directly regulates, affects or promotes the same sector or type of business they left the private sector for, to become a public servant.

    Conversely, once leaving public service, the individual would be enjoined from contacting officials on behalf of, promoting, lobbying or attempting to influence legislation for any business or industry, for a period of three years.

    A perfect clause would prevent someone from taking a job in any industry, after lobbying on its behalf, for a period of five years.

    Which would stop crap like this.

    --
    Some days it's just not worth
    chewing through my restraints.
  20. Cable News anchors ask. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Informative

    Tom has been at the forefront of some of the very dramatic changes that we've seen in the way we communicate and how we live our lives.

    Taking inspiration from Jon Stewart's commentary last night about the recent trend in cable news (namely CNN) anchor questions:
    I'll ask, "Is this a good thing or bad thing?"

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Cable News anchors ask. by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 2

      I saw that segment and it was hugely depressing. This is what our country has come to. Is it a good thing... or a bad thing...?

  21. Hope and Change! by stenvar · · Score: 2

    After bailing out car companies and banks, paying off Wall Street, and making sure that people have to pay vastly inflated prices to health insurers under ACA, and after shoving many billions in the hands of energy companies (green and otherwise), I guess Obama is now turning his laser sharp crony-capitalist intellect towards screwing over the American people with another all time favorite: telecommunications.

  22. Re:Like Wile E Coyote named head of Roadrunner res by s.petry · · Score: 2

    Are you not glad that all of those crazy conspiracy theorists were just "crazy conspiracy theorists"? Sarcasm aside, while nothing is currently changing at least myself and others can say "Told ya so!" and watch more and more of the reality we were telling you about unfold.

    For everyone now learning how bad reality really is, it may be worth making your own shiny new hat!

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  23. Re:Like Wile E Coyote named head of Roadrunner res by bussdriver · · Score: 2

    Regulatory capture is an old problem that continues to spread but has been around for decades - the direct proof of the corruption has been lacking due to the pathetic press which itself has been captured in a similar way so it can't serve it's regulatory role either.

    THEY DO HIDE IT, the direct obvious unavoidable proof is not allowed out in the open and they will wage a political war against anybody who LEAKS such evidence (despite informed and reasonable people knowing all of it beforehand they didn't have the level of proof for the masses that leaks provide.)