Slashdot Mirror
Cornell Team Says It's Unified the Structure of Scientific Theories
An anonymous reader writes "Cornell physicists say they've codified why science works, or more specifically, why scientific theories work – a meta-theory. Publishing online in the journal Science (abstract), the team has developed a unified computational framework they say exposes the hidden hierarchy of scientific theories by quantifying the degree to which predictions – like how a particular cellular mechanism might work under certain conditions, or how sound travels through space – depend on the detailed variables of a model."
As a cyberneticist and information theorist I was right with you on science (or signal processing in general) being a form of (de)compression until you went bat-shit insane:
The brain contains an id, an ego, and a superego which have their own goals and weaknesses, and from this we can predict the general behaviour of people.
Prove it! When I look in a head I see a complex neuronal network. I don't find "id" or "ego" or "superego" or any other unfalsifiable bullshit.
The problem is that we don't have any way to measure how good a theory is, or even whether it is any good at all
Fool. How accurately the theory predicts actual outcomes in reality is the measure of a theory. As for your other philosophical bullishit: Protip: That's not a science. It's not based in reality. The way you determine which observations are outliers is not with an eye of the researcher, but with a statistics. The way to determine whether the results are significant is to distinguish them from random noise: It's why we have the Standard Deviations, and degrees of certainty (sigma).
I would continue, but it's clear you're just talking out your fool ass.
Here's some philosophy for you: We are all the same universe, each phenomena an event reflecting upon the one self; We record echoes of our experience and others find them familiar, thus science is done.