Slashdot Mirror


DoD News Aggregation Service "The Early Bird" Dead After 65 Years

SanDogWeps writes "Periodically viewed as copyright infringement by the media, the Department of Defense's 'Early Bird' has been delivering applicable headlines to the Armed Forces since 1948. It stopped updating on October 1st, along with a number of other government products, but when the lights turned back on, The Early Bird remained dark. A number of reasons have been floated, including applicability in the internet age, cost, and a lack of interest. Others claim The Early Bird was nothing more than a propaganda machine, by culling articles that painted DoD in a favorable light."

8 of 25 comments (clear)

  1. Re:The only constant is by INT_QRK · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Re "others claim The Early Bird was nothing more than a propaganda machine, by culling articles that painted DoD in a favorable light": Anyone who actually read the Earlybird over the years would know that this statement is patently untrue, as the service would routinely would feature articles that were unfavorable. I always thought that the reason would have to be so that readers would be afforded visibility on the range of relevant signals in the air, including the good, the bad and ugly.

  2. Anyone who believes by joshki · · Score: 5, Informative

    that the Early Bird posted only articles that painted the DOD in a favorable light, has never read the Early Bird. And I say this as one who read the Early Bird for about the last decade and a half.

    --
    I do not read or respond to AC's. If you want a discussion, log in. Otherwise, don't waste your time.
    1. Re: Anyone who believes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Think of it as either being a clipping service (if your recollection got that far back) or a customized news feed to show the relevant news for you and your industry. It would save you from having to hunt through the news, and also bring to your attention things you may have missed. A time saver.

    2. Re:Anyone who believes by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      You mean "lexically challenged."

      The military is well into a new era of political correctness:

          Pentagon’s Chief Personnel and Readiness Officer: Diversity and Inclusion Critical to Mission Success

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  3. malware problem? by HtR · · Score: 2

    Maybe the computer it was running on got a worm?

    --
    Have you tried turning it off and on again?
  4. Set to be replaced by "free market" spin jobs and by Machupo · · Score: 2

    Great... my first cuppa read through of the overnight happenings is defunct and the first email I get is from the army times touting their "alternative". But why would we want the soldier caste to have a nonpartisan/independent run-down of the news? FML...

    --
    *insert pithy sig here*
  5. As a submariner.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm greatly disappointed by this. I understand that my service, particularly on an SSBN, is one of the few remaining parts of the military without constant connectivity, but that hardly improves my mood. The Early Bird was the least biased and most lengthy of the small amounts of news that could occasionally make it across on the passive broadcast. I just hope not too much happens for the rest of the year.

  6. 3 people did it by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    In the paper era, the Early Bird had a little printing plant. By the end, it was down to 3 people and a Cold Fusion template.

    It was never for DoD PR. It was more about pulling rather obscure stories, often about DoD procurement or administration, into a brief summary for DoD managers. Something like "Gen. Smith takes command of USARPAC" barely rates notice in the civilian press, but it's a big deal in the Army.