Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

SkyRunner Car Goes Off-Road and Off-Ground

Posted by timothy on from the here's-your-gol-danged-flying-car dept.

Zothecula writes "Back in 2008, we heard about a parasail-equipped dune buggy, known as the Parajet Skycar. It could scramble over rough ground like a true off-roader, but then take to the skies when needed. One epic 6,000-km (3,728-mile) drive/flight from London to Tombouctou later, its creators got some ideas about how the design could be improved. The result is the lighter, better-flying and less-polluting SkyRunner – and you can order one now." Fans of American domestic parasail-equipped flying cars, don't forget that there's also the Florida-built Maverick.

9 of 26 comments (clear)

  1. Off road and off ground ... by DavidClarkeHR · · Score: 2

    If it goes off-road and off-ground, it's starting to sound like that jetpack I was promised back in the 50s.

    HURRAH FOR PROGRESS.

    --
    - Nec Impar Pluribus, or so I'm told.
    1. Re:Off road and off ground ... by Greyfox · · Score: 2

      It's a parasail-equipped car. I'm guessing once you bust the parasail out you have to pack it away again after. I'm also guessing that the FAA will consider that to be an ultralight and require you to take off from an airport (Which is really what defeats most of the best reasons to have a flying car in the USA anyway.)

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    2. Re:Off road and off ground ... by Tom · · Score: 2

      Not sure about the US, but I've had the pleasure of starting from the private/business departure area on my local airport, and it doesn't compare with the regular airport, it's an entirely different world. No security theatre, no waiting and sitting around, you arrive, go through the lobby, on the tarmac, into the plane, take-off. Total time spent on airport: 10 minutes at most.

      Being able to skip the lines and security theatre and waiting and boarding is easily worth it all by itself.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    3. Re:Off road and off ground ... by Greyfox · · Score: 2
      Oh yeah, you can just walk on to the local airport here, but it kind of defeats the purpose of having a "flying car" if you have to take off and land there. You still need to use the road system to get anywhere in town. During the epic flooding here a couple months ago, traffic in town was gridlocked. Every road going north and east had washed out and a couple hundred thousand people were trying to go north or east. Consequently you couldn't even go south or west because you had to go a little north or a little east to get to one of the southbound or westbound roads. And the roads south were pretty well choked up too because people wanted to turn into an eastbound road that wasn't moving. At all. If you had a flying car, you could have avoided all that and the washed out roads that were the reason for the gridlock in the first place. If you had to park your flying car at the airport, you wouldn't have been able to get to it until a week after the flood.

      If you're OK with parking your flying car at an airport, you could just get a decent old Cessna starting around 45 grand, which is a lot less than any of the prototype flying cars will set you back, and you can be flying it right now. You still need to get a pilot's license, but you'll need one for a flying car too.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    4. Re:Off road and off ground ... by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not quite sure where you're getting the impression that you need to take off and land from an airport in the USA. While I've never done it I have seen a helicopter land and take off from the parking lot of a business here in St. Louis on more than one occasion. With an appropriately equipped plane you can also take off and land in fields without anyone batting an eyelid... so long as you have the permission of the land owner or own the land yourself.

      Can you cite a FAR that shows that you can't fly from anywhere but an airport?

  2. Unfortunately... by msauve · · Score: 2

    It doesn't go on road. This thing is obviously not capable of meeting the requirements for a vehicle to be driven on public roads.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  3. Low-profile tires? We hates it, precious by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    Low-profile tires are awesome on the road, but this thing is designed to function off of it. The ideal tire for something as light as this would not only be narrower, but also have a taller sidewall. Well, or it would be a tweel, but it would still have a taller side.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Low-profile tires? We hates it, precious by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

      Sometimes style trumps function for purely practical (monetary, as in financial backing) reasons.

      Once upon a time, there was a project to build and drive a Miata 200mph on the Bonneville salt flats. From a pure engineering / efficient speed perspective, you'd want narrow wheels/tires for that (no reason to turn on the salt flats). However, when you're looking for funding for a project like that, one of the prime candidates are custom wheel manufacturers - and custom wheels are wide and oversized (for low profile tires.) So, the 200mph Miata just needed to turn the turbo boost up a couple of psi to be able to capture the wheel sponsorship.... BTW, the project almost happened, had a sponsored car from Mazda Japan and everything, but hit a major SNAFU when the donated car unexpectedly had to be returned to Japan after a year in the country, something about its import paperwork as a promotional vehicle.

  4. Historical perspective by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 3, Informative

    The October issue of Air & Space Magazine had an interesting article on an earlier attempt to get John Q.Public flying instead of driving. Hint: the problem isn't the cost of the vehicle.

    Cheers,
    Dave

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben