Slashdot Mirror


EU Considering Sensors In Sewers To Detect Bomb-Makers

Nerval's Lobster writes "Security agencies in Europe have found a whole new way to identify and approach bombmakers and other potentially dangerous radicals. The only problem with the approach is that it stinks. Literally. Researchers in a European-Union funded project called Emphasis are developing chemical sensors that can be embedded in networks of underground sewage tunnels to sniff the air and phone home at the first hint of chemical residue from the manufacture of bombs. Using remote sensors might be effective because the liquid- and gas byproducts of bomb production – and manufacture of many drugs as well – leak, seep or are poured into sinks and toilets to get rid of the evidence, according to Hans Onnerud, an analytical chemist with the Swedish Defense Research Agency. With such a catchall underneath the city streets, and the chemical wherewithal to identify which smells belong to bombs or drugs and which belong to other things, it should be possible to keep a close watch on development of dangerous materials in a city without invading the homes of residents, Onnerud added. In fact, if sewer-sniffing technology had been in place in 2005, British authorities might have had a much easier time tracing the location of the bombers, or even detecting them ahead of time and stopping the London subway bomb attack that killed 54 people. Fumes from the bombs used in those attacks, which were assembled in a house in Leeds that had been turned into a compact bomb factory, were strong enough to kill plants in the garden. It's extremely likely they would have been detectable from the sewer as well, Onnerud said in a statement announcing Emphasis. The sensors developed for Emphasis are designed to detect chemical reagents produced by the breakdown of chemicals in bombs. Each sensor is a 10-centimeter-long electrode that can be submersed in sewer wastewater to look for ions of the right configuration."

16 of 219 comments (clear)

  1. Unimaginable wasting of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bomb attacks are so rare, wouldnâ(TM)t it be cheaper to compensate bomb victims after the fact than include expensive bomb-sniffing equipment in infrastructure upgrades up and down the land?

    1. Re:Unimaginable wasting of money by jamesh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Bomb attacks are so rare, wouldnâ(TM)t it be cheaper to compensate bomb victims after the fact than include expensive bomb-sniffing equipment in infrastructure upgrades up and down the land?

      This, but not for reasons of financial cost. The price of living in a free society is that occasionally someone is going to get pissed off at the world and blow up spectators at a marathon or take a gun to a classroom of kiddies. It would be great if we could stop this, but if the only way of stopping it is to take away your freedom and allow the government to spy on its people then maybe the price is too high. And from a financial point of view, maybe the money would be better spent on education and help for people who need it.

      That said, this sounds like a cool idea from a technical point of view. I'm conflicted.

    2. Re:Unimaginable wasting of money by sumdumass · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It has been my experience that often governments do things because of something specific when all along they wanted to do it anyways.

      In other words, "bombs" probably is just a justification the public needs in order to allow this to happen. There are probably other reasons which wouldn't sound so acceptable if officially declared. Think about all the laws that get rammed through in the name of stopping terrorism but primarily end up being used to harass and prosecute drug users/dealers or something along other lines.

    3. Re:Unimaginable wasting of money by geoskd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It has been my experience that often governments do things because of something specific when all along they wanted to do it anyways.

      In other words, "bombs" probably is just a justification the public needs in order to allow this to happen. There are probably other reasons which wouldn't sound so acceptable if officially declared. Think about all the laws that get rammed through in the name of stopping terrorism but primarily end up being used to harass and prosecute drug users/dealers or something along other lines.

      If you read between the lines, the real reason was spelled out in the summary. These things can be used to detect narcotics manufacturing as well as bomb making. The real reason is the wish to escalate the war on drugs, which has been the real guiding principle behind, and primary use of, all anti-terrorism laws.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
  2. And later by moteyalpha · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear Sir, We were monitoring the sewer and it seems your daughter is pregnant. We checked the DNA and it is that kid you don't like. We only know you don't like him because the NSA shares information with us. On the side are ads for abortion clinics, diaper services, gun shops, and obstetricians provided by WalMart. BTW you need to check your cholesterol.

    1. Re:And later by jamesh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Dear Sir, We were monitoring the sewer and it seems your daughter is pregnant. We checked the DNA and it is that kid you don't like. We only know you don't like him because the NSA shares information with us. On the side are ads for abortion clinics, diaper services, gun shops, and obstetricians provided by WalMart. BTW you need to check your cholesterol.

      That might be a bit of a stretch, but OTOH detecting traces of THC or other drugs like that might not be outside the scope of this sort of project, and may not correlate with the average persons idea of a free society.

    2. Re:And later by moteyalpha · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I realized this could be done decades ago. I am surprised that it has taken this long to be implemented. I work in robotics and recently in molecular genetics. It is a complete source of DNA for every person. It is a wealth of "raw" information and since analysis is getting cheaper every day it could become a new data base that can be collected and sold. It is creepy and that is why it creeps.
      GATTACA. BTW, we checked your DNA and you have too many SNP's and will not be allowed to procreate as it would be a burden on the state. Also it would be the obvious creep of scope. Cold Cases with DNA and no match. It will happen.

  3. Big brother by giorgist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well with smart meters accurate enough to tell when you are watching TV and what, Now with these sensors knowing what you are flushing down the toilet How about some environment monitors so they know what we exhale ... Its getting pretty creepy

  4. What they say vs what they do by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What they say it will be used for: sniffing for bomb materials

    What it will be used for: sniffing for illegal drugs

    First they'll put a probe in each neighborhood. Then they'll put a probe in the sewer for each street. Then they'll put a probe in the individual drains from every house. Then when they detect cocaine, you'll get a ticket in the mail.

    You know, this brave new world is a lot less Brave New World than we thought it would be...

  5. That old business partner I want to get back at... by theNAM666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is just great! Pour a few bags of fertilizer down the drain by his house... next stop, my local IT competitor's shop...

  6. How very enlightened... by pev · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, the bomb makers just conduct their business in a house in the countryside that uses a septic tank instead of connecting to a sewer system. That's a lot of money and effort and false confidence that can be circumnavigated with great ease. Now, if they'd done this without telling anyone then they might have had an edge... Idiots.

  7. Re:You can't compensate the dead by geoskd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's hard to compensate you when you're dead, or one of your loved ones is crippled and you're going to need special care for them for the rest of their life.

    No, but there are far better ways to spend the money. Free mammograms for every woman in America this year would cost about $5 Billion, and would save approximately 50,000 lives. This stupid thing would cost the same, and save 50 lives... Sounds to me like this thing is a criminal waste of money, as is most security theatre...

    --
    I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
  8. False positives. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ammonium nitrate. Common fertilizer. Weapon of choice for terrorists, as it is easily available in large quantities and can be easily processed into a form suitable for use as an explosive. Whenever you read about a car bomb, it was probably this stuff.

    So every time you fertilize your garden and some rain falls, it'll set off the alarm.

    People undergoing radiotherapy also excrete high enough levels of radiation to pose some hazard to other people. So their toilets will be detected as dirty bomb factories.

  9. Re:Sorry by Chas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry. The terrorists WON already.

    We're now LESS free than we were, and the fucking morons claiming to "run" the country (insert your country's name here), are no closer to eradicating or even MITIGATING terrorism.
    Oh yes. And they, and a bunch of their friends, are now MUCH richer.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  10. Re:A surprising turn of events by queazocotal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the case, for example of the 7/7 bombings, these were made of organic peroxides.

    Nail varnish remover, hair bleach, limescale remover, and you're pretty much done.

    (you can't make a bomb from these chemicals simply in the concentrations they are normally used at - but you can't tell from traces if peroxides are part of hair dye, or a bomb.)

    The reagents used to make ricin are similarly problematic.

    Also - it's important to note that once in solution, you can't go back to the original compound.

    If you put Calcium hydroxide and Sodium chloride into the drain - you get a mix of ions.
    You can't tell if what went into a drain was Calcium Chloride or Calcium Hydroxide.
    This is clearly important if one is innocuous.

    In practice, it seems likely that most of the 'unique' signatures will come from illicit drug use - NOT manufacture of drugs or explosives.
    http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2008-02/your-sewer-drugs

  11. Re:A surprising turn of events by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Good chemical debunk, this is a physically (laughably) impractical as well.

    The sewer network for our city of 23,000 with some heavy industry, generates around two miliion gallons of flow a day. There are ~1100 manholes, but thirty main branches where one would definitely want $ensors, that would narrow it down to several hundred houses. Flow takes from 15 minutes to 10 hours to travel down these branches. In this hostile environment of liquid and floating and suspended solid it is difficult to keep even mechanical flow monitors operational (we don't bother), the thought of a sensor that requires immersion and direct contact cracks me up. The thought that these subterranean sensors need 24x7 radio links makes me hoot 'n holler.

    Okay... (wiping eyes)... so branch number five sounds an alarm. What do you do now?? You need to systematically place MORE sensors at all upstream branch points and wait for another positive. Then finally after several of these iterations you are down to one city block and have to stick a sensor on a camera in the upstream manhole and roll it slowly down the line until you hit a positive again. Then try to figure out which house the tap is for, it's not always obvious and we often need to pour dye to be sure.

    So the perps would need to be really cooperative and pour lots of it out at regular intervals for days to assist this tracing process as city workers slowly and visibly converge on their neighborhood.

    BUT HOLD ON. If some really clever roboticist could make an autonomous sewer walking spider that could crawl through 6 inch pipes (with roots and other obstructions) and maintain radio contact, which is a real bitch down there, then we'd have the beginnings of something.

    Sometimes it takes an infinite amount of money and time to implement a Clever Idea. But it's worth the wait.

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>