Slashdot Mirror


Mobile Devices Banned From UK Cabinet Meetings Over Surveillance Fears

MightyMartian writes "British securities services fear foreign intelligence agencies have developed the ability to turn mobile devices such as phones and tablets into bugs without the owner's knowledge, allowing them to eavesdrop on confidential meetings. According to the article, UK security services fear China, Russia and Pakistan have figured out a way to turn mobiles into microphones, and have them transmit even when they're off. Ministers in sensitive government departments have been issued with soundproof lead-lined boxes, which they must place their mobiles in when having sensitive conversations."

116 comments

  1. Cone of SIlence by Zaelath · · Score: 2

    Do we really have to Max?

    1. Re:Cone of SIlence by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      Before the meeting, just be sure and tell Hymie to "kill everyone's phone" - problem solved.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Cone of SIlence by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Do we really have to Max?

      It gets better. This also means the shoe phones too. Soon the rancorous debates will seem more like rancid debates.... unless the upgrade the ventilation.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    3. Re:Cone of SIlence by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2

      Unless you're holding you're meeting in a Faraday Cage I can turn a pair of old Sony Walk-man Headphones into a listening device without even touching them. It's not difficult.

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  2. Those evil Pakistwanians. by queazocotal · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Scowge of Dewocracies.

    1. Re:Those evil Pakistwanians. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know Barney Frank posted here.

    2. Re:Those evil Pakistwanians. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Those evil Pakistwanians. by gmanterry · · Score: 1

      So, you're be-Fudd-led about the identity of the poster?

      I always thought that Elmer Fudd was a cartoon caricature of Barney Frank. Am I wrong?

      --
      Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?
  3. Summary Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    And what the fuck is Pakistway? Is that near Stalinstan, or Armeniad?

    -- Ethanol-fueled

    1. Re:Summary Huh? by jc42 · · Score: 2

      And what the fuck is Pakistway?

      If you google it, you'll find that most of the hits are for exactly the text you just read in the summary. It doesn't seem to originate with /., though; that sentence is taken verbatim from a news-service report. /., like other news sites, has just posted the original article unchanged.

      There is a pakistanway.com/net site, a portal website in Pakistan. The reporter that wrote the quoted article might be a regular user of that site, and garbled the country name as a result.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    2. Re:Summary Huh? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      And what the fuck is Pakistway?

      Sounds like a newfangled name for the Silk Road (the original one).

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Summary Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's west of East Bumfuck and north of Lower Slobobia.

    4. Re:Summary Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what the fuck is Pakistway? Is that near Stalinstan, or Armeniad?

      -- Ethanol-fueled

      LOL the idiots are out in force on slashdot tonight. I thought hodejo and timothy were bad for getting the NJ tax on shipping wrong.

    5. Re: Summary Huh? by AGrumpyGit · · Score: 1

      It's the new name for Tower Hamlets, London. Google it.

  4. box by JohnVanVliet · · Score: 1

    " lead-lined boxes"
    well they DO have to keep Supper Man from seeing in

    --
    "I don't pitch OpenSUSE Linux to my friends, i let Microsoft do it for me
    1. Re: box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah. But it doesn't protect against evil DinnerMan and his minion BreakfastBoy.

      *wham*

      I'm batman.

  5. Pakistway by davidwr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is that anywhere near Norstan?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Pakistway by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I think it's a town in New Jersey.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  6. Good Lord! by Austrian+Anarchy · · Score: 4, Informative

    British securities services fear foreign intelligence agencies have developed the ability to turn mobile devices such as phones and tablets into bugs without the owner's knowledge, allowing them to eavesdrop on confidential meetings.

    This is positively ancient. Just so happens the elected officials are finally beginning to use the precautions that have been used in the military and other corners of government for quite some time.

    --
    Time Bomber the Book coming soon.
    1. Re:Good Lord! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All the recently discussed NSA abilities and programs were positively ancient as well. The real scandal is why all those countries currently up in arms over the US surveillance programs are lying their asses off when they proclaim they had no idea these surveillance programs existed. The same countries who have actually given data they have collected to the NSA and have in return requested data collected by the NSA.

    2. Re:Good Lord! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. This is totally old news. DOE defense labs have mini-lockers outside of secure area entrances where visitors' personal electronics can be stored--better to just leave them in a car trunk. Lab-supplied hardware is disabled in several ways if allowed in secure areas.

    3. Re:Good Lord! by Goose+In+Orbit · · Score: 1

      British securities services fear foreign intelligence agencies have developed the ability to turn mobile devices such as phones and tablets into bugs without the owner's knowledge, allowing them to eavesdrop on confidential meetings.

      It wouldn't surprise me at all if GCHQ were doing it as well... (but are afraid that the others will find out about it)

    4. Re:Good Lord! by Austrian+Anarchy · · Score: 1

      British securities services fear foreign intelligence agencies have developed the ability to turn mobile devices such as phones and tablets into bugs without the owner's knowledge, allowing them to eavesdrop on confidential meetings.

      It wouldn't surprise me at all if GCHQ were doing it as well... (but are afraid that the others will find out about it)

      It is so old and well known that I would guess most organized crime and terrorist organizations have been practicing this for years too.

      --
      Time Bomber the Book coming soon.
    5. Re:Good Lord! by thoughtlover · · Score: 1

      Don't forget biker gangs --scenes from Sons of Anarchy clearly show them putting all their cellphones in a basket (in a separate room) before they conduct their meetings. I think that most technically-savvy people are aware cellphones are modern-day tracking/listening/viewing devices. The byline should've read: ...securities services know foreign intelligence agencies...

      --
      No sig for you! Come back one year!
    6. Re:Good Lord! by Austrian+Anarchy · · Score: 1

      Don't forget biker gangs --scenes from Sons of Anarchy clearly show them putting all their cellphones in a basket (in a separate room) before they conduct their meetings. I think that most technically-savvy people are aware cellphones are modern-day tracking/listening/viewing devices. The byline should've read: ...securities services know foreign intelligence agencies...

      That is a good example from fiction drawn from reality. In another comment I mentioned organized crime too.

      --
      Time Bomber the Book coming soon.
  7. Supper Man can see through lead by davidwr · · Score: 1

    But he can't penetrate tupperwear.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  8. Good old Pakistway! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The land where editors are actually competent!

  9. Ever been in a SCIF ? by mbone · · Score: 3, Informative

    They won't let you take phones in there, either, for the same reason. And they haven't for decades now.

    1. Re:Ever been in a SCIF ? by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      No shit, right? Hey, if the US intelligence community won't let phones, 2-way pagers, or any electronic communications device into the SCIF, maybe it's because they know how it can be misused.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:Ever been in a SCIF ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same in the UK. A mate who worked for the MOD and he said that when he buys a new phone he had to buy one without a phone as taking a camera of any type in to the workplace was strictly forbidden and that wasn't an uber high security place

      They also soldered up the usb ports on his lap top (though as a bit of an own goal they helpfully added a cd/rw drive)

      If you go for an interview for jobs requiring security clearance you normally have to hand over all you electronics over before you get past the reception.

    3. Re:Ever been in a SCIF ? by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      The US and UK at a mil and police level knew what happens. You had crime tracking fail as the criminal community had total insight into their countries larger telephone networks and the domestic computing power to track all calls.
      You had different NATO groups, NSA and factions in the cell networks of different NATO countries over the years via junk software.
      If the contractors, police and mil can get in, so can anyone with the cash, press contacts or any other gov backing.
      Once telco codes and methods are shared, passing via many mil, police, govs, 'trusted' contractors its just codes for sale.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Ever been in a SCIF ? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 3, Funny

      A mate who worked for the MOD and he said that when he buys a new phone he had to buy one without a phone

      So what brand did he buy? Fisher-Price?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    5. Re:Ever been in a SCIF ? by Goose+In+Orbit · · Score: 1

      I believe that, if specifically asked, suppliers will provide stripped out versions of their devices for exactly these purposes

      (I'll admit that I have only anecdotal evidence of this happening, but it sounds reasonable enough to me)

    6. Re:Ever been in a SCIF ? by MemoryAid · · Score: 1

      Maybe a Nikon?

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
  10. A summary of all Old/New Tory Cabinet meetings by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 2

    Prima: Right, who's paying us?
    Secunda: Fotherington-Smythe Plc.
    Prima: And what do they want?
    Secunda: For HMRC to look the other way on their offshore banking; more unpaid labour via the Work Programme; an overseas meeting to drum up some business; hm, and they want to get into private healthcare work, so perhaps you could force the NHS to put some work out to tender?
    Prima: OK, gentlemen, let's do it. Don't forget to ask GCHQ to send them any intercepts which might be of use to them. Tertia, prepare the speech.
    Tertia: "Enterprise.. bla bla... hard working people.. bla bla.. austerity... bla bla... " hmm, growth.. nah, don't worry, should be easy to fudge these figures.
    Prima: Excellent.

    1. Re:A summary of all Old/New Tory Cabinet meetings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:A summary of all Old/New Tory Cabinet meetings by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1

      Quite: same old Tories, same old lies.

    3. Re:A summary of all Old/New Tory Cabinet meetings by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      For those not in the UK, that was a real ad campaign run by the Tories in the '90s. It is generally credited with losing them the election: when the only message you have is that your opponent is secretly Satan, you're not looking very electable.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  11. FOSS propaganda opportunity knocks by jago25_98 · · Score: 2

    Wait. Maybe we could make an exception for a fully open source, well code reviewed phone?

    Oh, it doesn't exist does it.

    OK, troll over. Just another opportunity to show that open source does have a unique selling point and it's not being capitalised on.

    1. Re:FOSS propaganda opportunity knocks by HiThere · · Score: 1

      IIRC, a fully open source phone would be illegal.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:FOSS propaganda opportunity knocks by Burz · · Score: 1

      Fairphone might qualify as fully open source... they seem to be proud of their open source status. http://www.fairphone.com/

    3. Re:FOSS propaganda opportunity knocks by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Really? I didn't find any mention of open source on their site, except for an 'also open!' regarding Android 4.2. Do they ship a GPU with no proprietary drivers? What about the baseband processor?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:FOSS propaganda opportunity knocks by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

      Yes I've heard that too, certainly for the UK and USA. To protect the airwaves. Not sure about the EU or other countries. The radio firmware would have to be supplied closed... any source code shouldn't be leaked...

    5. Re:FOSS propaganda opportunity knocks by Burz · · Score: 1

      "Open source" is still a techie term, but is referenced repeatedly on the site (just not in the most obvious places):
      https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Afairphone.com+%22open+source%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

      I also noticed some of their job postings stressed "open hardware".

      In any case, your question is a good one and I would hope help prompt clarification from Fairphone. I'd expect that Fairphone has hardware that is more open than most, but that full openness would be a future goal not yet attained.

  12. Funny thing about backdoors by MacDork · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Funny thing about backdoors, they can be used against you. The FBI have had this capability for years. Just google for "roving bug." What could possibly go wrong? Other people who aren't supposed to be using it have figured out how to exploit it? Do tell.

  13. What about the window? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That window in the background looked like a nice laser target to measure sound vibrations in the room...

    1. Re:What about the window? by PPH · · Score: 2

      Either no windows in secure meeting rooms. Or they stick little piezoelectric transducers to them and drive them with white noise.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  14. why lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lead lined? Are they using gamma particles or x-rays?

    What's wrong with iron... a much better shielding material for magnetic and electrical fields.

    or just anything conductive... like the bags the cops drop phones into during a search.

    1. Re: why lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copper (mesh) should be even better than iron or steel.

    2. Re: why lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not all three?

  15. Worried about the wrong country? by maroberts · · Score: 5, Informative

    . According to the article, UK security services fear China, Russia and Pakistway have figured out a way to turn mobiles into microphones, and have them transmit even when they're off.

    I'd be more worried about the likelihood the NSA is listening in after recent revelations

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

    1. Re:Worried about the wrong country? by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      There is ample reason for concern about Russia, China, and even Pakistan.

      Number of Russian spies in the UK back to Cold War levels, say security services
      Chinese Espionage: Britain's MI5 reports epidemic in spying
      China's spies come out from the cold
      Pakistani spies 'operating in Britain'

      I very much doubt that the US has ever aimed nuclear weapons at the United Kingdom. The Soviets / Russians certainly have. They still come for visits.

      RAF catches Russian bombers in UK airspace
      Yes, yes, I know, but still. Scramble! Scramble! Russian nuclear bandits at 12 o'clock!': The Kremlin's taunting Britain with Blackjack bombers

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:Worried about the wrong country? by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      The US doesn't need to point nukes directly on Britain. The British nuclear weapons have been bought from America, and contain secret self destruct codes that Uncle Sam can turn on anytime it wants to blow the UK up.

    3. Re:Worried about the wrong country? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      That you have to worry about Russia doesn't mean you don't have to worry about the USA.

      And indeed the likelihood of the NSA listening in is possibly as high as all the others combined.

    4. Re:Worried about the wrong country? by linuxguy · · Score: 1

      > The British nuclear weapons have been bought from America, and contain secret self destruct codes that Uncle Sam can turn on anytime it wants to blow the UK up.

      So true. I had the exact same dream. And people claim that we are making this stuff up!

    5. Re:Worried about the wrong country? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      No, not really.

      REPLACING TRIDENT

      The warheads carried by the Trident missiles are manufactured and designed in the UK by the Atomic Weapons Establishment.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    6. Re:Worried about the wrong country? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Well then, who can argue with that?

      REPLACING TRIDENT

      The warheads carried by the Trident missiles are manufactured and designed in the UK by the Atomic Weapons Establishment.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  16. It's Okay When We Do It by SerenelyHotPest · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Per this, I feel comfortable saying cry me a river.

    The outrage over foreign spying--in particular Chinese backdoors--on the part of the American intelligence community is really a form of the same thing: it's okay when we do it, but as soon as anyone else does the same thing to us, it's a gross affront to our privacy and the relationship we have with the spying party and possibly an act of war. I realize intelligence agencies are trained to think this way, but is it really so terribly difficult to grasp that if you don't want it done to yourself, it's probably a sign you shouldn't be doing it to others?

    1. Re:It's Okay When We Do It by jc42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ... it's okay when we do it, but as soon as anyone else does the same thing to us, it's a gross affront to our privacy and the relationship we have with the spying party and possibly an act of war.

      Well, yeah; that's because we're God's chosen people, so everything we do to those foreigners is good and moral, but if they do it to us, they're evil and wrong.

      [Plug in your favorite country, and translate to that country's official language(s), if necessary, to reach full understanding of how human governments work.]

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    2. Re:It's Okay When We Do It by chihowa · · Score: 1

      Maybe you Americans are like that, but the rest of the world isn't. Before the US existed, the world was a peaceful place with puppies and rainbows and... I'm sorry, I can't keep this up with a straight face.

      I just wanted to head off those who will inevitably chime in to say that something like this would never happen in their little utopia [sordid history of their country conveniently forgotten].

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  17. Following Recent News by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    After what has been revealed recently, anyone who thinks they are an ally of the USA needs to worry more about the NSA and other criminal organisations than Pakistan. At least they do not tell everyone that they have the divinely given duty to rule over the world. They may think it but, if so, are smart enough not to tell everyone about Pakistani Exceptionalism.

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    1. Re:Following Recent News by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Why is everyone still believing that they are saying what they mean. I rather expect that the left out the US because that's primarily who this is ruling is directed at.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  18. Dark Knight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Good luck, Mr Wayne!" ;-)

  19. Heh by blagooly · · Score: 1

    Funny because somebody just thought of this. Ding. Merits a Press Release. Really thought that one out eh? Love ya GB like a brother, likely always will. But y'all ain't what you used to be, yo. Canuckistan and the Oz mostly got it down still. But y'all? you're killin me.

  20. Fixed that for you by rainer_d · · Score: 5, Insightful

    According to the article, UK security services fear China, Russia and Pakistway have also figured out a way to turn mobiles into microphones...

    --
    Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
    1. Re:Fixed that for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insufficient fixing.
      Core dumped.

  21. China, Russia and Pakistway by heikkile · · Score: 1

    Pakistway?

    --

    In Murphy We Turst

    1. Re:China, Russia and Pakistway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I want to know is how do I get a job as a Slashdot editor? It seems they don't even need to proofread the summaries that other people write for them.

    2. Re:China, Russia and Pakistway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pakistan is an ally. Pakistway is ambivalent and always in the way of ally demands, whether good or bad.
      U.S.:"We want to use drones in your country to attack terrorists, there might be civilian casulties."
      Pakistan:"Okay"
      Pakistway: "How dare the U.S. attack civilians in our country! this is beyond the pale!"

      U.S.: "Okay, we did violate your country's sovereignty when killing Osama but what's done is done. We're all the better for it."
      Pakistan: "Fine"
      Pakistway: "We're charging the doctor who helped the Americans with...... treason? Mm.... let's make it conspiracy."

  22. The know this tech exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've used it on the Russians, Chinese and Pakistani themselves.

  23. Snowden's Fridge by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    I think the boxes could more approriatally called Snowden's Fridge

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Snowden's Fridge by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      I think the boxes could more approriatally called Snowden's Fridge

      But why is it lined with lead? As a Faraday Cage, wouldn't copper or aluminum make more sense? Also, it seems easy to defeat the metal box: you could just record the conversation (metal doesn't block sound), and then transmit it later when connectivity is restored.

    2. Re:Snowden's Fridge by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      According to TFS the box is sound-proof. So you can't record sound. And this may be why they use lead; it's heavy which may stop the sound vibrations better than light metals like aluminium.

    3. Re:Snowden's Fridge by kermidge · · Score: 1

      You're correct on the lead; a layer of which has long been a staple of building sound-attenuating walls. Found that out in mid-'70s when doing the materials and methods research for building a recording studio. (Interesting that the band for whom the studio was originally built laid down many tracks in one of the member's three-car garage - they liked the 'bounce' off the slab. We'd sometimes be up in the rafters with sheets of plywood or sheetrock for sweetener or mute. Fun times.)

  24. Russian, Chinese? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't tell me these suckers actually buy into "no spy"?
    All the Russians and Chinese really need are a handful moles at the NSA and the get all the GB's secrets essentially for free.

  25. Its Rupert and co they by mjwalshe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Should be worried about

  26. Blendtec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should just drop all toys into a Blendtec blender. That'll take care of it.

    So, why are we now allowed to fly with toys powered up - is it to allow the NSA to hear the Huns coming?

  27. Funny thing about chips designed in Cambridge by evilandi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Funniest thing about backdoors is that almost every mobile device in the world has an ARM chip, designed in Cambridge, UK. That's Cambridge as in MI5 open recruiting ground and MI6 clandestine recruiting ground.

    Devices manufactured in China, using a British-designed chip, routed through British Telecom using Huawei equipment... as you said, what could possibly go wrong?

    If I were the conspiratorial sort, I might have reason to suspect Cambridge-recruited personnel of working for the other side.

    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
    1. Re:Funny thing about chips designed in Cambridge by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      ARM licenses the design but the SoC engineers in other companies work with the design itself extensively. They'd probably notice a spying module. MIx's would have to infiltrate either these companies as well, or the silicon fabs.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Funny thing about chips designed in Cambridge by robthebloke · · Score: 1

      Most tech companies prefer to hire experienced engineers from overseas, than inexperienced graduates from next door. (Certainly that's what we did when I worked for a tech company in Oxford anyway....)

    3. Re:Funny thing about chips designed in Cambridge by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Funniest thing about backdoors is that almost every mobile device in the world has an ARM chip, designed in Cambridge, UK. That's Cambridge as in MI5 open recruiting ground and MI6 clandestine recruiting ground.

      Devices manufactured in China, using a British-designed chip, routed through British Telecom using Huawei equipment... as you said, what could possibly go wrong?

      If I were the conspiratorial sort, I might have reason to suspect Cambridge-recruited personnel of working for the other side.

      Nope.

      If you're Apple, Qualcomm or Marvell, your ARM chips don't come from Cambridge. They come from your own design house. That's because those companies own a microarchitecture license, which lets them implement the ARM ISA in any way they specify - they just get a bunch of docs saying what each instruction does, the encodings, and test suites, and are free to implement it as XScale (Marvell), Krait (Qualcomm) or Cyclone/etc (Apple).

      Now if you're Samsung, Allwinner, Broadcom, TI, etc., you're screwed because your silicon design comes from Cambridge and you're not allowed to inspect it.

    4. Re:Funny thing about chips designed in Cambridge by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Funniest thing about backdoors is that almost every mobile device in the world has an ARM chip, designed in Cambridge, UK. That's Cambridge as in MI5 open recruiting ground and MI6 clandestine recruiting ground.

      Devices manufactured in China, using a British-designed chip, routed through British Telecom using Huawei equipment... as you said, what could possibly go wrong?

      If I were the conspiratorial sort, I might have reason to suspect Cambridge-recruited personnel of working for the other side.

      All current or modern CPU designs have a microcode update capability. Perfectly good chips can be delivered, and then the microcode patch is applied. during the boot process. My android and my Linux system both do microcode updates at this boot time. For my desktop, Intel or AMD supply the "patches".

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  28. we need the cone of silence ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWtPPWi6OMQ

  29. Just take the battery out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, wait, with apple iCrap you can't do that, because Steve Jobs said so.

  30. It is next to Irfuckinstan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't know where it is? Well, duh. It must be publiek skool edumakasion.

  31. Lead-lined boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..Where can I buy one?

  32. Lead? by Cow007 · · Score: 1

    Maybe it was an illustrative device but you would not need to use lead. The standard practice is to use a Faraday bag or case which could be made of lots of different materials including lead as long as it is electrically connected to the closure. Lead is used for radiation shielding but for electro magnetic shielding a Faraday bag or cage is used...

    --
    411 Y0UR 8453 4R3 8310NG 70 U5!! -NSA
  33. British gov't afraid of surveillance? by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We aren't even talking about citizens being the recorders (which would be super-ironic).

    When the people in your government don't trust their closest co-workers, there's reason to be concerned about the health of the entire leadership system.

  34. Pakistani spies 'operating in Britain'? by linuxguy · · Score: 1

    I read the entire "The Telegraph" story. There was no mention of Pakistani spies in Britain, other than in the headline. And the two "spies" in the US, were more like lobbyists. They had donated money to politicians to get favorable opinion of Pakistani side of the Kashmir issue. This is hardly what you would call "spying".

    1. Re:Pakistani spies 'operating in Britain'? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      My mistake. This is the one I should have linked to:

      'Pakistani spies' in the Houses of Parliament

      US prosecutors claim that three “Kashmir Centers” in Washington, London and Brussels, are run on behalf of “elements of the Pakistani government, including Pakistan’s military intelligence service, the Inter-Services Intelligence Agency (ISI).”

      The Pakistani intelligence services seem to not come to the attention of the press too often in the UK. There is an allegation that they were involved with Sri Lanka's intelligence service in the UK to recruit and train operatives against the Tamils.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  35. Off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ugh, if it's transmitting it isn't off. I assume off is used as "powered off" and power is required to transmit. A device cannot be "off" and "transmitting" they're mutually exclusive.

    1. Re:Off? by HiThere · · Score: 4, Informative

      A lot of modern "off" switches should really be named "sleep". They don't turn the power off. If they did you couldn't use, e.g., wake on the network. Nothing that allows remote activation really turns itself off...and that includes a huge number of things with off switches.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  36. Its too late to turn off the phones... by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

    ...They already know what you think.

  37. copper is not good for magnetic fields by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In the "near field", the magnetic fields are dominant over the electric fields. Copper foil is fine for radiated e-field at a distance, not so hot close up. Something with very low coercivity and high permeability is what you want: iron or "mu-metal".

    Copper mesh sucks in general, because it's woven, and you have wires that go from one side of the mesh to the other. Sure, copper windowscreen is nice for shielding line frequency, but for RF.. uh-uh.. you want perforated metal with no weaving. Look at your microwave oven window. (note well, though.. microwave ovens aren't all that hot at shielding)

  38. Infinity Bug by beadwindow · · Score: 2

    Infinity Bug anyone, this is indeed ancient tech. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinity_transmitter

  39. Thanks Snowden, now what for the UK? by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    For years the GCHQ and NSA where happy to let UK political leaders chat away. Where was the skilled UK tech insight into been secure from Russia, the press, other motivated foreigners or groups? The same understanding of the secure UK telco networks could be seen and sold by any US/NATO contractor.
    Only now does the UK gov understand what 'their' junk Enigma like cell network encryption can really be used for. The UK security staff willing, knowingly and over generations offered their countries political leadership junk encryption and told them its 'safe' to use it.
    Now the reality of having some of your skilled UK tech more in touch with the NSA, NATO and other groups in the USA sets in. Who are your trusted security staff really working for and who are they promoting internally over the years? Two spy bosses? One in the US? One for contractors in the US? One in the UK? Would they do a modern MI5 and work for Russia too? China? Cash from the press? Cash from just about anyone or group? Some other faith?
    All that UK policy about political issues, commercial deals, crime, oil, gas, weapons sales is not ending up in a safe in the Soviet Union - its been used in near real time thanks to sloppy UK staff.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  40. why lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Presumably they want a Faraday cage. This doesn't need to be lead, does it? Maybe they are worried the phones are radioactive...

  41. Re:That's only the tip of the iceberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I rather stay a virgin than have a dick up my ass. Having a dick up your ass hurts like hell! Only a retard would call something like that hot sex!

  42. No pudding for you! by msobkow · · Score: 1

    The fact that the Slashbot editors couldn't even catch something like "Pakistway" instead of "Pakistan" is bad enough.

    But the fact that they haven't corrected the typo after this long is an absolutely sickening example of lazy assed, shoddy, don't-give-a-shit attitudes. Shame on Dyce.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:No pudding for you! by msobkow · · Score: 1

      Or is it "Dyse"? "Dyks?"

      How does it feel, bone heads?

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  43. There's an easier way. by Detritusher · · Score: 1

    "Ministers in sensitive government departments have been issued with soundproof lead-lined boxes, which they must place their mobiles in when having sensitive conversations."

    Have they considered taking the battery out of their phone?

    1. Re:There's an easier way. by Maritz · · Score: 1

      They probably can't take a screwdriver in there either.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  44. Bug the lead-lined boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The solution is just that simple. I mean, is a government agent seriously going to take apart their lead-lined box to see what's inside it? You have rest assured that anyone buying a sound-proof lead-lined box is doing it to avoid being overheard, which is an excellent reason to put a bug in every one of them.

  45. soundproof lead-lined boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do they have in their mobiles? Radioactivity? Why use lead-lined boxes, not copper-lined ones? Must be another royal screw-up on part of beaurocrats: if it has radio- in it's name, then use lead to reduce radio-activity.

  46. Like this is new? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2
    Is this like one of those stories that tell people to make sure they cook their Thanksgiving turkey enough, and to put it in the refrigerator when it's done?

    Because this news is about as fresh as that, a wireless phone should not ever be in the vicinity of any meeting, ever.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:Like this is new? by Therefore+I+am · · Score: 1

      Me? I am buying into companies that specialize in mouth hygiene products of all types. It is a near certainty that all future diplomacy and major corporate policy will be discussed in close head to-head meetings in the centre of huge rooms in order to prevent espionage. Bad breath will be a career-ending certainty... Note that head-to-head is exactly the way that head-lice are transmitted to others so expect to be able identify major decision-makers either by their constant head scratching or by their permanently shaved heads.

  47. Doesn't go far enough by AGrumpyGit · · Score: 1

    "Ministers in sensitive government departments have been issued with soundproof lead-lined boxes" Excellent! Ministers need to ensure that they're still holding their electronic devices when they go into the lead-lined boxes. When you're in a box, no-one can hear you (allegedly) shout "PLEB!"

  48. Why don't they put themselves in lead-lined boxes? by hughbar · · Score: 1

    As a Brit, I feel that this would solve a great many problems simultaneously. No sneaky air-holes for these a*-holes either. There, I feel much better now...

    --
    On y va, qui mal y pense!
  49. Re:That's only the tip of the iceberg by Goose+In+Orbit · · Score: 1

    *pedant mode on*

    It's a good thing Elton John sang and performed on stage as well as he took dicks in his ass! Otherwise, we wouldn't have such hits as "Benny and the Jets," "Daniel," and "Tiny Dancer."

    *pedant mode off*

  50. Re:That's only the tip of the iceberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The emotion you're lacking is embarrassment. You should be cringing that you even took the time to write that. Go get yourself some shame. It's a useful emotion and keeps you from looking like a dickhead in front of everyone.

  51. Aww, no more Angry Birds... by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

    Well, I suppose they finally found a way to get rid of people playing Angry Birds while in the government.

  52. Coffins by contrarywise · · Score: 1

    "Ministers in sensitive government departments have been issued with soundproof lead-lined boxes..." You had me nearly hopeful there but no, its only the bloody phones that are locked in the soundproof lead-lined boxes.

  53. Operation Bubble and Squeak by lissnup · · Score: 1

    This charade, of successive governments declaring their concern/anger/whatever about "security" is beginning to turn in on itself. I watched this video again just last week, which features a chap from Scotland Yard bragging about the ease with which they turned the reporter's mobile phone into a location/communications tracking and monitoring device. The UK seems to take some pride in being a world leader in surveillance and espionage. If the reported supply of chemicals to countries like Syria for use as weapons (to cite just one example) is any indication, it would be fairly safe to assume this expertise and technology is also on sale to anyone willing to meet the price. I guess it's time we stopped being distracted by dramatic headlines long enough to figure out why the member countries which created ECHELON/PRISM are now pushing this dumb "OMG, foreign governments use spies!" narrative quite so forcefully.