Slashdot Mirror


US FDA Moves To Ban Trans Fat

UnknowingFool writes "Citing growing health concerns about trans fat, the FDA today proposed measures to eliminate it from the U.S. food supply. While trans fat can still be used, the new measures now place the burden on food processors to justify the inclusion of it in a food product as experts have maintained that there is no safe level of consumption and no health benefits. Since 2006, the amount of trans fat eaten by the average American has declined from 4.5g per serving to less than 1g as restaurants and the food industry have reduced their use of it. There will be a 60-day public comment period for the new proposal."

5 of 520 comments (clear)

  1. Artificial trans fat, not just trans fat. by intermodal · · Score: 5, Informative

    TFA is more specific than the brief above describes.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  2. Re:Is it working? by iONiUM · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's not the point of removing trans fats. Rather (from the wikipedia article) "In humans, consumption of trans fats increases the risk of coronary heart disease[2][3] by raising levels of the protein LDL (so-called "bad cholesterol") and lowering levels of the protein HDL ("good cholesterol")."

    Should we not ban something that is directly linked to an increased risk in heart disease? I suppose smoking is also directly linked, but not banned, so I leave that debate up to everyone who isn't me.

  3. Re:What about natural trans fat? by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Informative

    "The Food and Drug Administration on Thursday proposed measures that would all but eliminate artificial trans fats, the artery clogging substance that is a major contributor to heart disease in the United States, from the food supply."

    Keyword: artificial. But because that wasn't enough, the article goes on to say:

    "Some trans fats occur naturally. The F.D.A. proposal only applies to those that are added to foods."

  4. Re:Is it working? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Wiki article and TFA are wrong.

    LDL is not the 'cause' of heart disease. It never was. Damage to cells is the cause. Trans fats damage cell which mistake them for saturated fats. Oxidative stress is another mechanism.

    LDL raises because it is being generated to transport materials to the sites of damage for repair. Persistent raised LDL is a sign of persistent damage, from things like oxidation, glycation and excess exposure to Miley Cyrus. LDL raising is a response to cellular damage, not a cause. This is why LDL suppressing statins have failed spectacularly to improve human health even while it reduces LDL.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  5. Re:Is it working? by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Informative

    Uh... Transfats cause Heart disease. Not that I like government regulation, but all they are doing here is making a distinction that man made transfats are NOT food, they are an additive. Which is a fact.