Slashdot Mirror


Red Hat Wants to be a Dominant Force in the Cloud (Video)

Red Hat has two primary Cloud Evangelists: Gordon Haff and Richard Morrell. Richard says this about himself: "I'm Red Hat's Cloud Security Blogger and Cloud Evangelist based in Europe. Passionate about good code and Open Hybrid Cloud. Founder of SmoothWall protecting millions of networks for 13 years globally. My blogging and my podcasting is my own editorial and does not represent the views of Red Hat..." We have known Richard since the 20th Century, so this interview has been a long time coming. In it, he talks about how Red Hat is working to become as strong in the Open Source cloud world as it already is in GNU/Linux. This interview may not "represent the views of Red Hat," but it obviously represents the views of a loyal Red Hat employee who is also a long-time Linux enthusiast.

20 of 40 comments (clear)

  1. The Cloud by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    Buzzword bingo anyone?

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  2. Not There Yet by Kagato · · Score: 3, Informative

    A buddy of mine spent a lot of money earlier this year to attend a Red Hat convention and take the (Paid) cloud training. What a waste. While the training was hands but very simple. The trainer didn't know much more than the attendees and it seemed clear to all parties involved it was not ready for prime time.

  3. Once again by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

    There's no video showing up, only blank space. This is 2013 guys, Flash died years ago.

    1. Re:Once again by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      flashblock plugins are more mature than HTML5-blockers, so I'm not sure your analysis is robust.

    2. Re:Once again by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Even Adobe dropped development about the Flash plug-in, so I'm not sure why you're arguing about facts.

    3. Re:Once again by trongey · · Score: 2

      There's no video showing up, only blank space. This is 2013 guys, Flash died years ago.

      This is 2013. YouTube (Flash videos) comprises almost 20% of all Internet traffic. Not very dead.

      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    4. Re:Once again by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Flash is not required nor needed to play standard H.264 video files.

  4. Re:Who doesnt? by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1

    Still trying to de-buzzword it, but I think it means, "We want to host virtual servers."

    It's like the 1960s but with better alternatives.

  5. Re:Who doesnt? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

    How do I submit my punch cards over the internet? Do I take a picture of them?

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  6. the cloud is dead by FudRucker · · Score: 1, Interesting

    the government NSA spys has killed any trust in telecommunications and internet connectivity, if i had anything of value that i wanted to keep private such as blueprints and plans for products soon to be sold on the market i surely wont keep any of that on any networked computer, and if i had to transport data anywhere it would be put on an encrypted usb thumbdrive which is easily hidden and/or transported anywhere

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:the cloud is dead by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      That's fine, nobody is forcing you to make money off of networked computers.

      Personally, I'd rather do business with RedHat than Amazon if pricing and service is comparable. Especially if Open Source means I have a turn-key package to run my own hosting, with the same VMs, on my own servers to handle the minimum load, and then I can buy the extra peak load from RedHat. That would be heaven.

      Right now it is a bit of a pain, because the typical setup is hand-managed servers for the minimum, and then proprietary tools for the cloud compute units. Nobody is really bridging that in a way that lets the customer take advantage of price savings.

      And by the way, it is the exact same NSA regardless of if my hosting provider is company A, or company B. Totally not relevant.

    2. Re:the cloud is dead by eric_herm · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is to have your own on-demand cloud and server, ie for internal customers in big company.

  7. Re:Who doesnt? by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1

    Why would you want to submit them over the Internet when you have a perfectly good postal sevice?

  8. "cloud evangelist" ?? by vikingpower · · Score: 1

    WTF ? I mean, with such a job title, how ridiculous can one be ???

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re: "cloud evangelist" ?? by slydder · · Score: 1

      Really? You're actually asking this question? We are speaking of Richard âoethe DICKâoe Morrel here. The only thing bigger than his mouth is his ego. He is almost the entire reason we forked off and started IPCop back then. Nothing much to expect from him except temper tantrams, threats and hot air. Wishing RH a lot of luck with that one.

  9. Re:Who doesnt? by jythie · · Score: 1

    Hrm. I wonder how much of a market there would be for an app that you can snap pictures of punch cards and run them in an VM.....

  10. Re:Put Your Data in The Clown by jythie · · Score: 1

    Well... I am going to have nightmares tonight now....

  11. How about... by mlts · · Score: 2

    There are a lot of cloud providers, but what would be nice is a standard on client-side encryption and key management [1], regardless of what cloud provider destination. That way, if I'm sending files to Dropbox, S3, Glacier, RH's cloud, Azure, or another provider, all I have to do is change out the name and authentication info, not have to use a completely different API. This would also allow me to have redundant cloud storage for vital documents, automatically retrieving a document even if one of the providers is offline.

    [1]: Key management is just as important as encryption, but it is something that gets forgotten about until a disaster, and one has a nice pile of tapes... but no way to decrypt them.

  12. Re:Who doesnt? by timeOday · · Score: 1
    To mean anything, "cloud" must at least include redundancy of both the data and the network to access it.

    Anyways, it is far from ridiculous for RedHat to aspire to this. RedHat is used in many data centers and has contributed a very large number of software packages for clustering, management, and virtualization.

  13. cloud-to-butt by dhart · · Score: 1

    Slashdot video needs a cloud-to-butt plugin. But seriously, Ubuntu is now the dominant OS in the space (surprise!) largely because Canonical has been focused here since 2009, and they've made some very astute decisions backing the right technologies, e.g. shifting quickly from Eucalyptus to Open Stack.