Slashdot Mirror


EU To Allow 3G and 4G Connections On Planes

jfruh writes "In America we're celebrating the fact that we don't have to stow our Kindles during takeoff and landing anymore, but the EU is going a step further and not requiring passengers to switch their phones to "airplane" mode anymore. If you're on an airplane with a Network Control Unit that regulate cellular connections, you can text and make calls over standard 3G and 4G networks. You'll want to watch out for roaming charges, though, especially if you're on a flight crossing national borders."

17 of 106 comments (clear)

  1. No. by pseudofrog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No phone calls on planes here in the US. Please.

    1. Re:No. by MoonFog · · Score: 2

      Yeah, as if flying wasn't annoying enough I now have to listen to the person next to me talk on the phone for the entire flight? Roaming chargers will negate some of that I'm sure, but given that EU has also suggested that those charges should be drastically lowered as well... yeeeah, what can possibly go wrong?

    2. Re:No. by Drethon · · Score: 5, Funny

      CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?!

    3. Re:No. by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Informative

      Some trains in Germany have "no cell phone" quiet zones. Maybe airlines could introduce them, as well?

      But, given the current business models of airlines at the moment, they will charge extra for a quiet zone!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:No. by mcfedr · · Score: 2

      Face the music, planes are public places, people will talk. Also people will use the internet!

    5. Re:No. by xaxa · · Score: 2

      LIsbon to Warsaw (which is about the extreme edge of a flight within the EU)

      Dublin to Istanbul?

      Saint Denis (Reunion) to Paris, just over 11 hours.

      (But within the continent, I'd guess somewhere in Finland to somewhere in Portugal, or Cyprus to Scotland.)

  2. Re:Only for business by Grantbridge · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the EU there are laws keeping roaming charges down. Often they are less than the cost to use your own phone in your own country!

  3. I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I honestly thought that one of the reason why they have the no electronics during take off and landing was to ensure that people are paying attention to what's going on in case of emergencies.

    Hell I've had stewardesses ask me (very nicely) to put away a physical textbook I was reading.

    But yeah, please keep the ban on cell phone use for making calls, in fact ban any type of audio conferencing. Last thing I want is an obnoxious asshole blabbing away really loudly next to me.

    1. Re:I don't understand by CWCheese · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's the reasoning I was given by an off duty flight attendant who was flying standby in the seat next to me. She said that during the takeoff and landing segments, the crew would rather the passengers be alert and ready since those are the riskiest segments of the trip. And I'd agree, especially flying in the Rocky mountain states where the wind shear in the late afternoon - early evening timeframes makes any roller coaster seem dull. I couldn't care less about the numbskull in the next row yelling at his ex on the phone, except that he'd better not be an obstacle when we need to evac the aircraft.

      --
      Have a Day!
  4. Cost Benefit Analysis Needed... by jfalcon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Having worked for a provider of these services, I can tell you that telephone calls are usually very, very short due to cabin noise and connection charges. But SMS and Data have always been a bigger draw. I see this as a win as hopefully this will nudge the FCC/FAA to become more symmetrical in the rules between the US and Europe.

    The real question is what will be the cost model for UMTS/LTE vs In-Cabin WiFi as each has a entirely different set of data protocols and are routed differently once they reach the ground network.

    --
    boom goes the dynamite....
  5. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yeah I've been using my phone during take off and landing my ENTIRE life. I hide the electronic and the second the flight attendants sit down the device comes back out. I'm listening to music. What's the point of of all this hubbub? I can't even get a signal and if I leave my phone on. It will keep trying to find a signal and will run itself out of battery faster.

    Another question that baffles me, how were the people on the 9/11 flights able to use their cell phones during flight? Yeah they have the in seat phones, but i still remember hearing people say, "Yeah they used their phones!" Fun fact that everyone seems to forget.

    Getting a signal on the plane is not the problem, you have unobstructed line-of-sight to a shitload of cells. The problem is that you mess everything up for the people on the ground by communicating with so many cells...

  6. Re:Cell towers by jfalcon · · Score: 5, Informative

    On old school 800mhz AMPS cell phones and at lower altitude this may be true. But today most cell towers are pointed at the ground hence why you don't get a carrier signal until you're approaching/leaving the runway. What happens today is that cell phones just burn power as the phone goes to full power trying to connect. Think of how many people leave their phones on in the luggage or pocket while flying. If a phone can bring down an airplane, don't you think you'd see mobile phone jails prior to boarding?

    These systems work on the premise of noise generators that blot out the external signals and a new carrier is presented just above the noise level that commands mobile phones to idle their transmitters down. In fact, one might say this causes *less* interference as you don't have a bunch of phones blasting away RF energy inside the cabin.

    --
    boom goes the dynamite....
  7. Phoney issue by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sat next to a guy once who taught jet pilots for a living. He had an awesome flight tracker running on his laptop.

    Apparently rules against phones being on during flight isn't an FAA thing, it's an FCC thing. You pass from cell tower to cell tower so fast it confuses and stresses the system.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  8. Re:What's the point? by godrik · · Score: 4, Funny

    Another question that baffles me, how were the people on the 9/11 flights able to use their cell phones during flight? Yeah they have the in seat phones, but i still remember hearing people say, "Yeah they used their phones!" Fun fact that everyone seems to forget.

    And you saw how that flight ended?? DO YOU REALLY WANT THAT AGAIN?!

  9. The point: hear safety announcements by photonic · · Score: 2

    There are two reasons you have to switch of your electronic devices during takeoff/landing: first, the electronic interference, which is not considered a problem anymore these days. The second, more unknown, reason is that they do not want you to listen to music so that you can hear the safety announcements. I am not talking about the usual 'live-vest is stored under your seat' story that everyone has heard 100 times, but instructions to evacuate in case of real emergencies. Since these emergencies happen mostly during the first and last few minutes of a flight, they want you to pay full attention. Source: close friend is instructor for flight crews.

    --
    karma police: arrest this man, he talks in maths; he buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio. [radiohead]
  10. Roaming costs by houghi · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are roaming cost limits in Europe. This means a maximum of 0.09 EUR per SMS. Not sure what the limits are for national calls, nor what it is for data, but the limits are reasonable within Europe.

    I wonder if they will make exceptions depending on destination or if they find another way to add some extra cost to it.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  11. Summary has it completely wrong, surprise surprise by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

    In America we're celebrating the fact that we don't have to stow our Kindles during takeoff and landing anymore, but the EU is going a step further and not requiring passengers to switch their phones to "airplane" mode anymore.

    You'll still need to switch to airplane mode during take-off and landing: "For safety reasons, these services are only available at altitudes above 3,000 meters, the Commission added."

    You'll want to watch out for roaming charges, though, especially if you're on a flight crossing national borders.

    You won't be connecting to ground networks. You'll be connecting to the plane's onboard network - you may well be charged at "roaming" rates but "crossing national borders" will have nothing to do with it.

    From the article:

    Aircraft offering the service have a Network Control Unit on board that works like a jammer that prevents mobile devices from connecting to and interfering with ground-based systems. They ensure they connect only to an Aircraft Base Station, which is the antenna to which mobile devices connect and runs as a cable through the cabin, it added.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.