Slashdot Mirror


Ancient Egyptians Created "Meat Mummies" So Dead Could Continue To Eat

sciencehabit writes "What is your beloved mummy going to eat for the rest of eternity? For some ancient Egyptians, the answer included meat. In King Tutankhamun's tomb, for example, archaeologists found 48 wooden cases of butchered cuts of beef and poultry. But unlike offerings of fruit and grains, which could last for quite a while once dehydrated and placed in dry tombs, pieces of meat required special treatment. After just a few hours in the desert heat, 'they will become a terrible mess if you don't take some steps to preserve them,' says Richard Evershed, an archaeological chemist at the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. The solution? Mummify. Now, a team of researchers led by Evershed is shedding light on the embalming processes used to create these so-called meat mummies, including mummified beef ribs."

93 comments

  1. News? Stuff that matters? by BringsApples · · Score: 0

    Really?

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    1. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 4, Funny

      Think of it as an analogue to McDonalds, or SPAM.

    2. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nerds love jerky.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      Are you calling King Tutankhamun a jerky? I wooo wooo....!

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    4. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by geekoid · · Score: 5, Informative

      "archaeological chemist"
      How is that not news for nerds?
      This is awesome nerd fair.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      That and there aren't many comments on this "nerd fair" article.

      I think people are still trying to digest the idea. Clearly that is more palatable than the meat. And that's not saying much....

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    6. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it got us an article tagged "Africa Death Food."
      So that's something!

    7. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by flyneye · · Score: 4, Funny

      Add water, makes its own sauce...

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    8. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was actually eating beef jerky when I saw this headline.

      Now I want to see how "mummified meat" compares!

    9. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by retroworks · · Score: 1

      mod up funny

      --
      Gently reply
    10. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ancient Egypt was definitely not rain forest, can't imagine where you got that idea. It was, of course, farmed on a large scale -- just as it is today, by using the Nile.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    11. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Really?

      The "Archeological Chemist" apparently knows next to nothing about food preservation. This "mess after a few hours" thing is bunk.

      As the U.S. Army Survival Manual has been saying for at least 4 decades: in a hot, arid desert, you can bury a piece of raw meat the size of your arm under the sand, and it will remain edible (if somewhat dried out) for at least 2 years.

    12. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      Yuk! But this only strengthens the argument that Egypt was once a lush rainforest-like environment.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    13. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "After just a few hours in the desert heat"

      If I remember right there are arguments over what that area looked like during that time. The wood found is of that from Tropical like regions, and there are other findings that the area was or could have been a tropical like region. I believe the region still was a pretty hot and humid if it was a tropical like region. Of course the Egypt's also traveled the seas so they could have obtained there resources elsewhere.

      I am not sure if the person that turned this story in wrote such a false "After just a few hours in the desert heat" statement or if it was the original authors/scientists that made this statement. But it should be just cut down to "the region was hot, and perhaps humid"

    14. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      Maybe ancient ancient Egypt was. Did they get a date on that meat? I didn't see that in the article anywhere. But yes, for what I said to be true, it would require Ancient Egypt to be older than they suspect it is.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    15. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here.

      Or you're... slow. Real slow.

    16. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by cusco · · Score: 2

      Yeah but this "archaeological chemist" thinks that ancient Egypt was a desert, whereas most others have concluded that it was a lush rainforest, and that the people of that day were into farming on a large scale. That and there aren't many comments on this "nerd fair" article.

      Twelve thousand years ago the area was mixed grassland and scrub fed from the heavier rainfall caused by the extended ice cap. Forests ran along river banks. By four thousand years ago the area was arid desert. It was never rain forest.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    17. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      I have no way to prove anything about ancient Egypt, anymore than you do, but what you said stands within reason. I'd just question why what would appear to be the world's most ingenious civilization, that spanned the globe apparently, would set up shop in a desert. Of course there could have been a good reason, the ancient Egyptians did all sorts of strange things. It's just that all of the other pyramids around the world are in lush rainforest-like places, many covered completely in vegetation. Also the sphinx was apparently worn down by a significant amount of rain since it was constructed.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    18. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't say "never" due to plate tectonics, but I'm pretty sure it hasn't been a rainforest for as long as humans have existed.

    19. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by sunsurfandsand · · Score: 3, Informative

      Did they get a date on that meat?

      "Best by 1334 BC"

    20. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by cusco · · Score: 1

      Not all the pyramids, those of Chanchan in Peru are in the midst of the Atacama Desert, the driest desert in the world and the largest pyramid of all, the Great Mound near Kehokia, is in the Great Plains of North America. My time was off a bit though, it was during the period of 10,500-5,500 years ago that the Sahara was grasslands.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    21. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You "wooo wooo"? WTF?

      What is this I dont even

    22. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by akinliat · · Score: 2

      IIRC, the reason that the Nile valley was settled and farmed had less to do with rainfall, and more to do with the regular, seasonal floods that acted as a natural irrigation system for the floodplain. The area probably was less arid than today, but the (twice-yearly?) floods made the floodplain fertile.

    23. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd just question why what would appear to be the world's most ingenious civilization, that spanned the globe apparently, would set up shop in a desert.

      Spanned the globe? Globe? No. Ancient Egyptians spanned the Egypt and bits of Libya, Sudan, and Middle-East.

      There wasn' t one pyramid-building civilization, there were many. When people start to build monuments out of stone, pyramid is the natural shape to start with because it's inherently stable so it's easier to build one than, say, Empire State Building.

      Pyramids were built on different times in different parts of the world. The Maya in Central America were considerate enough to date their monuments and from that we know that they were built mostly between AD 200-800. The Ancient Egyptians weren't as considerate, but the builders at least left quarry marks in stones that show that they were built roughly around 2500 BC. That's about 3000 year difference in time.

      People have claimed and unfortunately are still claiming that the Great Pyramid is older than the Egyptian civilization. To do so they have to ignore the evidence left by the builders themselves. For example, the name of king Khufu was painted in the wall of one of the relieving chambers in a place that was inaccessible until a route there was blown in the early 19th century. Similarly, on the outer side there are blocks that have quarry marks mentioning Khufu's name in them.

    24. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great Mound near Kehokia, is in the Great Plains of North America

      Cahokia, not Kehokia.

      Cahokia was the largest and most influential urban settlement in the Mississippian culture which developed advanced societies across much of what is now the Southeastern United States, beginning more than 500 years before European contact.[5] Cahokia's population at its peak in the 1200s was among the largest cities in the world, and its ancient population would not be surpassed by any city in the United States until the late 18th century. Today, Cahokia Mounds is considered the largest and most complex archaeological site north of the great Pre-Columbian cities in Mexico.

      Cahokia Mounds is a National Historic Landmark and designated site for state protection. In addition, it is one of only 21 World Heritage Sites within the United States. It is the largest prehistoric earthen construction in the Americas north of Mexico.[4] The site is open to the public and administered by the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency, and is supported by the Cahokia Mounds Museum Society.

      I grew up in Cahokia, IL. which is about ten miles away from the mounds, and is the oldest setlement in or west of the Mississippi valley. It was founded hundreds of years after the Cahokia peoples vanished

      (mcgrew, can't log in today, my laptop at home broke last night dammit. Hope I can get data off of it in time to post another chapter Saturday)

    25. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      You make me want to la la.

    26. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      We're talking 5,000 years ago, not a million. Egypt was a desert during "ancient" times.

    27. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by adisakp · · Score: 1

      Yeah but this "archaeological chemist" thinks that ancient Egypt was a desert, whereas most others have concluded that it was a lush rainforest, and that the people of that day were into farming on a large scale. That and there aren't many comments on this "nerd fair" article.

      It wasn't a rain forest. Yearly flooding of the Nile provided fertile soil and water which allowed for farming of the flood plain. Go a bit away from the Nile and you were still out in the dessert rather quickly. This is why nearly all major ancient Egyptian sites are along the Nile River (whereas a rainforest would have allowed for a more geographical dispersed population).

      The Nile no longer floods every year though due to the construction of the Aswan damn.

    28. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Zevulon the Great. He's teriyaki style.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    29. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      I'd just question why what would appear to be the world's most ingenious civilization, that spanned the globe apparently, would set up shop in a desert. Of course there could have been a good reason, the ancient Egyptians did all sorts of strange things. It's just that all of the other pyramids around the world are in lush rainforest-like places, many covered completely in vegetation. Also the sphinx was apparently worn down by a significant amount of rain since it was constructed.

      I don't know how to say this without significant offense, but you've been listening to waaay too many crackpots.

      As another poster pointed out, pyramids are a common monument structure, not because one globe-spanning civilization was obsessed with them, but because they are some of the simplest stable structures to create. (Never mind that there are significant differences in the way different cultures made their pyramids look either.)

      The reason the Egyptians "set up shop in a desert" is that it wasn't one at the time. People were living in Egypt as far back as 8000 years ago, and it took over 2000 years for the region to become a desert. However, the Nile River valley was and still is one of the most fertile places on the planet. It nurtured their civilization for millennia after the surrounding area went to hell.

      As for the sphinx & rain thing, that's been pretty thoroughly debunked too.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    30. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      In today's world, I'll take the crack-pot label any day, but I understand what you mean. Let me assure you that I have seen the crackpots that I assume that you're talking about, and ...yeah, they can be funny. There are enough questions about Egypt that no one can answer with any sort of authority, and I'm not going to try either. I think we'd both agree that something amazing happened there, regardless of how, when or why. Cheers!

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    31. Re:News? Stuff that matters? by PatM8236 · · Score: 1

      Lol, I don't think there's anything in the WORLD that could make me eat SPAM. McDonalds I choke down from time to time, but overall....yuck! Should pull all 3 side by side and see which lasts the longest...

      --
      - PatM
  2. At My School... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

    ...this was lunch. Every day. I went back to the old campus recently and now it's a high end food court. The lunch ladies morphed into hot young babes.

    1. Re:At My School... by bob_super · · Score: 1

      Now that you've old and toothless, campus food is indeed perfect and the middle-aged angry girls look like babes.

    2. Re:At My School... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Since you wrote "you've" when you apparently meant "you're", I'm guessing you're still rocking junior high.

      Nice snipe, though. With whom are *you* so angry?

    3. Re:At My School... by bob_super · · Score: 1

      That wasn't personal, sorry if you took it that way.
      Your statement just conjured an image of how old I would have to be to find the lunch ladies attractive...

      Typos happen, it's freezing in this lab, to keep the magic smoke inside darn components.

    4. Re:At My School... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      In total darkness; not only are the lunch ladies beautiful, I'm handsome.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:At My School... by operagost · · Score: 1

      In this economy, you are going to find some pretty attractive 20-somethings working in unglamorous jobs.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  3. Sounds like a cool grindcore band... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This definitely sounds like a headline act at one of the local metal dives.

    1. Re:Sounds like a cool grindcore band... by Todd+Palin · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps Lady GaGa?

  4. Makes me hungry just thinking about it by volvox_voxel · · Score: 1

    ..Is there such a thin"g as healthy / organic jerky? I have to go on a long trip for the holidays and need to keep a carload of people sated.. "meat mummies" however, does not sound as appealing as "hungry man" or "Smoked Bronco Billy's", or "snackmasters" ; don't think I could convince the wife..

    1. Re:Makes me hungry just thinking about it by volvox_voxel · · Score: 1

      ..I was just making up names, trying not to accidentally shill a real company, with visions of TV dinner add campaigns that played on the manly theme to convince people to buy bland prepackaged food. It's amazing how well some advertising themes can work.

    2. Re:Makes me hungry just thinking about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe it or not, "Hungry Man" is a real frozen-dinner brand that's been in the US for decades -- as you said, it's amazing how well some ad themes work.

    3. Re:Makes me hungry just thinking about it by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Doubtless there were hieroglyphs advertising those same dinners when they were first frozen. The ancient Egyptians were amazing.
      I like the turkey and the terriyaki too.
      I like the chicken if the sauce is not too blue....

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    4. Re:Makes me hungry just thinking about it by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 2

      try biltong, it's far better than anything jerked, it's made from real cuts of meat, vinegar, herbs, spices and salt. oh, and the name means 'buttock strips'

    5. Re:Makes me hungry just thinking about it by operagost · · Score: 1

      Jerky Direct has organics.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  5. Purina Zombie Chow by themushroom · · Score: 1

    How do you tell the diner from the food?

    1. Re:Purina Zombie Chow by Todd+Palin · · Score: 2

      How do you tell the diner from the dinner, perhaps?

  6. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now they can send their resumé to Con-Agra.

  7. Okay, one odd fact... by themushroom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When people were mummified, their internal organs were put into clay pots in the sarcophagus.
    So if the kings were to eat after death... where did anyone think the food was going to go?

    1. Re:Okay, one odd fact... by avandesande · · Score: 1

      There is no better thing for a mummy to eat, than tasty morsels of mummy meat!

      No chance of it going bad in their abdominal cavity.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:Okay, one odd fact... by ljw1004 · · Score: 2

      Did they know the same physiology that we do today? Did they know that the stomach and intestine were needed for digestion?

    3. Re:Okay, one odd fact... by Golddess · · Score: 2

      My thoughts similarly. After all, didn't they think that the brain's only purpose was to produce mucus?

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    4. Re:Okay, one odd fact... by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      Maybe the king died as he was eating, and they wrapped up his left-over food? This is the first I've ever heard of there being "food" in any tomb.

      I wish I knew the context behind why they did anything that they did in ancient Egypt.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    5. Re:Okay, one odd fact... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they did. If you eat something bad, it hurts your stomach. If you eat too much, and get indigestion, it hurts your stomach. When you feel full... it's your stomach that feels full.

      You'd have to be batshit insane to think any other part of the body was primarily involved in food processing.

      ps. By stomach, I mean entire digestive tract... there's not a good word for it. I've seen pregnant women get offended when doctors use the word "tummy" - it's as good a word as any - a woman with a baby in her stomach should probably be arrested. Abdomen is probably the best term for the area, but may be too technical for some.

    6. Re:Okay, one odd fact... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you think?

      In the clay pot, of course.

  8. Americans have that too. It's called the McRib by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    But the treatment process is very delicate so it's only available a few times a year.

  9. Yeah by Stargoat · · Score: 1

    I would eat some mummy meat. I bet it might be tasty.

    Heh. In more practical terms, it would be cool to figure out what went into making this meat. We could eat ancient Egyptian meat, much in the same way that we enjoy Midas Touch from Dogfish Head Craft Brewed Ales.

    --
    Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    1. Re:Yeah by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 3, Funny

      It was better known by the locals as "Mesopotamia Mystery Meat"

    2. Re:Yeah by cusco · · Score: 1

      By this time the Andean peoples were already drying meat for use in the off season. I wonder what made it so much more difficult to dry meat in the Sahara.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  10. Wow.. by houbou · · Score: 1

    Ignorance is bliss....

    1. Re:Wow.. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      And in this case, bliss is underrated.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  11. Patent Issue by avandesande · · Score: 1

    Would this undermine claims on Slim Jim proprietary recipe?

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  12. Obligatory Hubert Farnsworth by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is an outrage - I was going to eat that mummy!

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re: Obligatory Hubert Farnsworth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well done sir - I've been scrolling through all these comments waiting for someone I make that reference!

  13. Coming soon... by TheloniousToady · · Score: 1

    ...to a McDonald's near you: "Meat McMummy". And don't peal off the simulated gauze wrapping: it's edible. Yum!

  14. The francise possibilities by Forever+Wondering · · Score: 1

    In-N-Out-Mummy, Mummy King, Mummy-In-The-Box, McMummy's ...

    --
    Like a good neighbor, fsck is there ...
  15. That explains a lot by paiute · · Score: 1

    I always thought Finnan haddie was supernatural.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  16. But What Does it Taste Like? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    But What Does it Taste Like?

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:But What Does it Taste Like? by Todd+Palin · · Score: 1

      chicken

  17. Because ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... man cannot live on Twinkies alone.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Because ... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to eat Buck Roger's robot?

  18. Re:WTF Modern Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you insist on the Pyramids being built in a desert? Science has proven the Nile moved over time...
    Why do you insist they were built by humans? We have more resources and technology than ever before in history, and it's still considered impossible...

    There are people who also consider it to be impossible that the world isn't flat. The word for people like this is "idiots".

  19. Re:WTF Modern Science by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 2

    Why do you insist they were built by humans? We have more resources and technology than ever before in history, and it's still considered impossible...

    Because the other explanations are 1) They were build by aliens, or (other non human earthlings) and 2) It came into existence naturally. Both are even more unlikely.

  20. Re:WTF Modern Science by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    We have more resources and technology than ever before in history, and it's still considered impossible...

    No, it's considered very impractical. We could fairly easily build them, it would just be expensive and take a while. The Egyptians had plenty of wealth and resources (natural, scientific, labor, and time) to build the pyramids.

    Why do you insist on the Pyramids being built in a desert? Science has proven the Nile moved over time...

    According to the article found here: http://ees.ac.uk/userfiles/file/EA-32pp03-05-Lutley.pdf, in the past 5k years the Nile has shifted only within the Nile floodplain, a shift of about 4 km total from West to East. Giza is located roughly 5 miles from the edge of the current path of the Nile. So, it is quite possible that the pyramids were built closer to the Nile than they are now (look at page 5 of the article). If you notice, none of the pyramids are built on the floodplain.

    So, in other words, I'm not saying it was aliens, but it is pretty damn obvious the Egyptians built the pyramids.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  21. Road Trip Food by TheSeatOfMyPants · · Score: 1

    Well, here's some of the stuff my family used for the 8-12 hour drives to visit relatives when I was a kid:
    -- Non-dense cereals (different brands/flavors to suit people) in ziploc baggies
    -- Anything that can be used in a non-refrigerated brown-bag lunch works -- bring an ice chest for anything that's better when cold.
    -- Cheese & deli meat safe at room temp (e.g. salami, pepperoni...)
    -- Soft French bread rounds (for sandwiches or alone) & mustard
    -- Large croissants (alone or sandwiches)
    -- Garlic bread
    -- Mozzarella "string" cheese or mozzarella balls
    -- Buy pizzas & immediately cover in plastic wrap and refrigerate until cold, then cut into pieces (square pizza is easiest), wrap them individually & keep in ice chest.
    -- Books/websites aimed at getting kids to start cooking always have at least a few ideas for quick &easy food/snacks you can make with little effort.

    Things you or others could make relatively quickly orpossibly buy at a bakery:
    -- Rum cake, pound cake, spice cake, etc.
    -- Brownies (preferably using a sweet liquor like rum or kahlua; quadruple the alcohol in it so it doesn't all burn off, and you'll have some very relaxed/happy travelers without it being enough to hurt a kid or someone on medication)
    -- Sweet or pizza-type focaccia, the moister the better

    --
    Now mostly at Usenet:comp.misc & SoylentNews.org (it's made of people!)
  22. Re:WTF Modern Science by able1234au · · Score: 1

    There is a youtube video of a guy showing how he could have built stonehenge. It is quite interesting how with a few tricks he can move massive blocks of stones, and position them so they put upright into the ground. Everything is impossible if you do it the hard way, finding the easy way is the trick. Finding that easy way is not obvious of course. He uses everyday items like sticks and stones that prehistoric man had easy access to. The egyptians could do it even easier and had more than one guy.

  23. Re:WTF Modern Science by rubycodez · · Score: 2

    not impossible at all, any competent civil engineer can tell you how to do it with or without machines.

    those sensationist articles you read claiming otherwise were not written by engineers.

  24. Re:WTF Modern Science by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    There is a youtube video of a guy showing how he could have built stonehenge.

    Mythbusters did it too with just some 2x4s

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  25. Re:WTF Modern Science by able1234au · · Score: 2
  26. Re:WTF Modern Science by cusco · · Score: 1

    it's still considered impossible

    When the Peruvians here idiots exclaiming that Machu Picchu and Sacsayhuaman must have been built by aliens because people couldn't have done it they're insulted. They know almost exactly how it was done, and their ancestors were even recorded doing it by the Spanish. Can't help but think the Egyptians might well feel similarly insulted.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  27. The fast food industrie by mbierenfeld · · Score: 1

    must have found this recipe a couple of decades ago.

  28. Stating the funking obvious. by mtthwbrnd · · Score: 1

    " After just a few hours in the desert heat, 'they will become a terrible mess if you don't take some steps to preserve them,' says Richard Evershed, an archaeological chemist at the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom." I always suspected that meat might go bad under those circumstances but am so glad to see that my tax money is being used to fund a Professor (we are not worthy!) to confirm this. Does he have a citation in a peer-reviewed journal for his incredible claim though? Or is it just a wild conspiracy theory.

  29. Dear Arby's, by sabbede · · Score: 1

    Have I got a product for you!

  30. Mummified beef... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....it's what used to be for dinner.

  31. Lose weight fast! by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

    With the amazing Ancient Egyptian Diet you'll lose weight fast and those pounds will stay off, forever!

  32. Mmm... by Koreantoast · · Score: 1

    Zombie bacon.

  33. Re:WTF Modern Science by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Why do you insist they were built by humans? We have more resources and technology than ever before in history, and it's still considered impossible...

    Where do you get the idea that the pyramids would be impossible to build today? It's just a pile of limestone blocks. People built a 6 meter pyramid using a total of only 40 something men in less than a month for an episode of NOVA, using only a few modern shortcuts (iron tools to carve and a front-end loader to transport blocks to the building site to be placed by hand after demonstrating that it was possible to move the blocks by rolling them). The only thing that makes pyramids impressive is that they were built with muscle power and no understanding of pulleys.

    As for how they were constructed back then, there are a number of dominant theories, and the lack of consensus isn't because there's evidence disproving them so much as a lack of a smoking gun. Plus, there's evidence that there wasn't a consistent method and that techniques evolved over time.

    Seriously, what's the alternative -- aliens? What plausible reason would aliens have to come down a build huge stone pyramids and leave not a single trace of more advanced construction materials or techniques? Why no skyscrapers? Why no reinforced concrete? Why no electrical or other fuel infrastructure? Why no plastics and no glass, even? Just overly fancy stone cairns with the corpses of rich humans stuffed inside? That's it? Insanity.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").